Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T14:32:35.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of plane of nutrition of ewes in early and mid pregnancy on performance of the offspring: female reproduction and male carcass characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

C. Muñoz*
Affiliation:
, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
A. F. Carson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down, United Kingdom
M. A. McCoy
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down, United Kingdom
A. R. G. Wylie
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down, United Kingdom
A. W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Alterations of foetal development in utero can affect the structure and physiology of the adult offspring, a process known as “foetal programming” (Barker, 1994). Results from the first phase of this study indicated that offspring from mature ewes offered a restricted energy intake in early pregnancy were heavier at birth and had improved survival rates to weaning (Muñoz et al., 2006). The aim of the second phase of the study was to determine the effects of plane of ewe nutrition in early and mid pregnancy on carcass characteristics of male offspring and on reproductive performance and concentrations of the adiposity indicator, leptin, in female offspring, post-weaning.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, DJP 1994. Mothers, babies, and disease in later life. BMJ Publishing Group, London.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C, Carson, AF, McCoy, MA, Dawson, LER and Gordon, AW 2006. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 2006, York, UK, p. 5.Google Scholar