Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T04:42:52.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of replacing grass silage with maize silage or concentrates on lamb output from housed pregnant ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

R W Annett*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute of Northern Ireland, Agriculture Branch, Hillsborough, Co. Down, United Kingdom
A F Carson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute of Northern Ireland, Agriculture Branch, Hillsborough, Co. Down, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Rations for pregnant ewes in the UK are often based on grass silage. However, due to a number of factors, the cost of producing high quality grass silage has increased significantly in recent years so lower cost alternatives need to be investigated. Production of forage maize has the potential to reduce forage costs on mixed beef/sheep farms, with high dry-matter yields (comparable to that of a 3-cut silage system) of high quality maize silage possible from a single harvesting operation (Easson and Fearnehough, 2000). However there is limited information on the effects of feeding maize silage to pregnant ewes. Alternatively, grass silage could be eliminated from rations by feeding high grain diets. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of replacing grass silage with either maize silage or concentrates on the performance of housed pregnant ewes and their lambs.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Easson, D. L. and Fearnehough, W., 2000. Grass and Forage Science 55, 221–231.Google Scholar