Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T00:53:54.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of replacement rate on the welfare of sows introduced to a large dynamic group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

N.E. O’Connell ,
V.E. Beattie  and
B.W. Moss
N.E. O’Connell*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down, BT26 6DR, U.K.
V.E. Beattie
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down, BT26 6DR, U.K.
B.W. Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Queens University Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, U.K.
*
Email:niamh.o’connell@dardni.gov.uk
Get access

Extract

Dynamic grouping systems for sows involve the regular replacement of sows which are due to farrow with those that have just been mated. Evidence suggests that newly-introduced sows are often subjected to high levels of aggression from ‘resident’ sows in dynamic groups (O’Connell et al., 2003). In addition, newly-introduced sows often appear intimidated from using kennel areas and are forced to lie on less-preferred slatted dunging areas (Moore et al., 1993). The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of replacing 10, 20, 30 or 40 percent of a group of forty sows on the welfare of sows newly-introduced to the group.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2004 , 2004 , pp. 70
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Moore, A.S., Gonyou, H.W. and Ghent, A.W. 1993. Integration of newly-introduced and resident sows following grouping. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 38: 257–267.Google Scholar
O’Connell, N.E., Beattie, V.E. and Moss, B.W. 2003. Influence of social status on the welfare of sows in static and dynamic groups. Animal Welfare, 12: 239–249.Google Scholar