Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T15:06:55.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of teat-order on the pre- and post-weaning growth performance of piglets weaned at 3, 4 and 5 weeks of age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

C.A. Tsourgiannis*
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, School of Biological Sciences, Newton Abbot, TQ12 6NQ, U.K.
V. Demečková
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, School of Biological Sciences, Newton Abbot, TQ12 6NQ, U.K.
P.H. Brooks
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, School of Biological Sciences, Newton Abbot, TQ12 6NQ, U.K.
J. Eddison
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, School of Biological Sciences, Newton Abbot, TQ12 6NQ, U.K.
Get access

Extract

The nutritional impact of weaning may, to a large extent, be determined by the milk consumption of the piglets prior to weaning, as piglets suck their ‘home’ teat (Spinka et al., 1995). Since piglets possess a specific teat order and the production of milk from different teats on the same sow may differ by as much as 200% or more (Algers et al., 1990), different piglets within the same litter can be assumed to be affected differently by the nutritional change. This experiment was conducted in order to evaluate the influence of teat-order in pre- and post-weaning growth performance of piglets weaned at 3, 4 and 5 weeks of age.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algers, B., Jensen, P. and Steinwall, L., 1990. Behaviour and weight changes at weaning and regrouping of pigs in relation to teat quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 26, 143155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinka, M. and Algers, B., 1995. Functional view on udder massage after milk let-down in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 43, 197212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar