Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T18:47:49.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationships between in vitro gas production characteristics and composition of tree leaf fodders from bolivia, west africa and colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

C D Wood
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
C Grillet
Affiliation:
CIRAD-EMVT BP 5035, 34032 Montpellier, Cedex 01, France
M Rosales
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
S Green
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
Get access

Extract

Tree leaves are important fodders in many less developed countries, particularly in dry seasons when alternative feeds can be scarce. Although many leaves appear to be good quality fodders due to their generally high crude protein content, many contain anti-nutritive factors which reduce their nutritive value. Tannins are the most widespread of the anti-nutritive factors and are to be found in many tree species. An in vitro gas production method has been developed by Theodorou et al (1994) and applied to the ranking of tree leaf fodders (Wood et al, 1993). This paper combines data obtained from three separate pieces of work investigating the nutritive value of tree leaf fodders in Bolivia, West Africa and Colombia. It seeks to investigate relationships between in vitro gas production at various times of incubation and proximate composition, fibre and tannin content in order to identify which components are of particular importance in determining gas production characteristics and whether these relationships are consistent over a wide range of species from different sources.

Type
Techniques and Methods
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hagerman, A. E., 1987. Radial diffusion method for determining tannin in plant extracts. J. Chem. Ecol., 13: 437449.10.1007/BF01880091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nsahlai, I. V., Siaw, D. E. K. A. and Osuji, P. O., 1994. The relationships between gas production and chemical composition of 23 browses of the genus Sesbania . J. Sci. Food Agric. 65: 1320.10.1002/jsfa.2740650104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, L. P., Hrstich, L. N. and Chan, B. G., 1986. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry, 25: 223230.10.1016/S0031-9422(00)94533-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M.L. and Butler, L.G., 1977. Prussian blue assay for total phenols. J. Agric. Food Chem., 25: 12681273.10.1021/jf60214a034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Williams, B. A., Dhanoa, M. S., McAllan, A. D. B. and France, J., 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 48: 185197.10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C. D., Johnson, J. and Powell, C., 1993 Evaluation of bolivian tree leaves as fodders by an in vitro fermentation technique Agroforestry Forum 4(3): 2834.Google Scholar
Wood, C. D. and Plumb, V. E., 1994 Total phenols and protein precipitation assay as indicators of the inhibitory effects of phenols on rumen micro-organisms proceedings of the 109th meeting of the british society of animal production, abstract no 75. Animal Production 58: 445.Google Scholar
Wood, C. D., Tiwari, B. N., Plumb, V. E., Powell, C. J., Roberts, B. T., Sirimane, V. D., Rossiter, J. T. and Gill, M., 1994. Interspecies differences and variability with time of protein precipitation activity of extractible tannins, crude protein, ash and dry matter contents of leaves from 13 species of nepalese fodder trees j Chemical Ecology 20 (12): 31493162.10.1007/BF02033717CrossRefGoogle Scholar