Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:09:01.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concluding Remarks from a Cosmologist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2015

Andrew H. Jaffe
Andrew H. Jaffe*
Affiliation:
Astrophysics, Blackett Laboratory Prince Consort Road Imperial College LondonUK email: a.jaffe@imperial.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I conclude the SCCC21 conference highlighting some of the contrasts we heard about, some specific topics (the statistics of random fields), and discuss how some of these play out in the analysis of cosmic microwave background data. I conclude with a hopeful look at the efficacy of blind analyses in the CMB and elsewhere in cosmology.

Keywords

cosmology: cosmological parametersmethods: statistical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Symposium S306: Statistical Challenges in 21st Century Cosmology , May 2014 , pp. 407 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Adler, R. J. 1981, The Geometry of Random Fields (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM, 3600 Market Street, Floor 6, Philadelphia, PA 19104))Google Scholar
Armitage-Caplan, C. & Wandelt, B. D. 2004, PRD, 70, 123007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashdown, M. A. J., Balbi, A., Bartlett, J. G., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 761Google Scholar
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. 1986Google Scholar
Bond, J. R. & Efstathiou, G. 1984, 285, L45Google Scholar
Bond, J. R., Jaffe, A. H., & Knox, L. E. 1998, PRD, 57, 2117Google Scholar
Cameron, E. 2014, arXiv:1406.6371v1, 6371Google Scholar
Cantalupo, C. M., Borrill, J. D., Jaffe, A. H., Kisner, T. S., & Stompor, R. 2010, ApJ, 187, 212Google Scholar
Efstathiou, G. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 343Google Scholar
Good, I. J. 1971, American Statistician, 25, 62Google Scholar
Harrison, E. 1970, PRD, 1, 2726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hivon, E., Górski, K. M., Netterfield, C. B., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 2Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. 1980, The large-scale structure of the universeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. & Yu, J. T. 1970, ApJ, 162, 815Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration VII. 2014, A&A, in press, arXiv:1303.5068Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration XII. 2014, A&A, in press, arXiv:1303.5072Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration XVI. 2014, A&A, in press, arXiv:1303.5076Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration XXII. 2014, A&A, in press, arXiv:1303.5082Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration XXIII. 2014, A&A, in press, arXiv:1303.5083Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration XXIV. 2014, A&A, in press, arXiv:1303.5084Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 2006, The Annals of Probability, 34, 122Google Scholar
The Polarbear Collaboration. 2013, arXiv:1312.6645Google Scholar
The Polarbear Collaboration. 2014, arxiv:1403.2369Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y. B. 1972, MNRAS, 160, 1PGoogle Scholar