Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-05T17:16:57.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamic responses of sunspots to their ambient magnetic configuration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2011

S. P. Bagare*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India email: bagare@iiap.res.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In our earlier study of a revisit of the classic Wilson Effect, it was found that a large proportion of sunspots do not display the geometric effect which is ascribed to a depression of the umbra. It was shown that the presence or absence of the effect, observed close to the limb, depends upon the ambient magnetic configuration of the sunspot. In this follow up study, we look for the impact of changes in ambient magnetic configuration on the measurable properties of sunspots during their disk passage, using observations obtained at the Kodaikanal observatory during 1978-80. Digitized photoheliogram data were used to examine and measure areas of spots and their umbrae for 101 cases. Magnetic field measures published by the Academy of sciences, Leningrad were used to evaluate the ambient magnetic configuration. The results indicate that the extent of magnetic bipolarity is associated with changes in the proportion of the area of the penumbra to that of the umbra. In regular spots, the relative area of penumbra reduces with reduction in the strength of ambient opposite polarity spots and pores. However, in the presence of pore sized blob(s) in penumbra, and with associated emerging fluxes, the penumbra is significantly enlarged. But in the presence of a light bridge or a split umbra, the relative area of penumbra is considerably reduced.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Bagare, S. P. 2010, in: Hasan, S. S., & Rutten, R. J. (eds.) Magnetic Coupling between the Interior and Atmosphere of the Sun, p 398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagare, S. P. & Gupta, S. S. 1998, Bull. Astron. Soc. India, 26, 197Google Scholar
Brandt, P. N., Schimdt, W., & Steinegger, M. 1990, Solar Phys., 129, 191Google Scholar
Bray, R. J. & Loughhead, R. E. 1964, in The International Astrophysics Series, Chapman & Hall, LondonSunspotsGoogle Scholar
Gokhale, M. H. & Zwaan, C. 1972, Solar Phys., 26, 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, P. S. 1981, in: Cram, L. E., & Thomas, J. H. (eds.), Sacramento Peak Observatory The Physics of SunspotsGoogle Scholar
Ringnes, T. S. 1964, Astrophys. Norvegica, 8, 303Google Scholar
Schlichenmaier, R., Bello Gonzalez, N., Rezaei, R., & Waldmann, T. A. 2010, Astron. Nachr. 331, 563Google Scholar
Thomas, J. H. & Weiss, N. O. 2008, in: Cambridge Astrophysics Series 46 Sunspots and Starspots (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar