Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-15T01:12:41.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IX.—On the Geometry of Ɛ-Matrices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

H. S. Ruse
Affiliation:
University of Leeds.

Synopsis

The two regular representations of quaternions give rise to a classical set of sixteen 4 × 4 matrices that have fairly recently reappeared in a paper by S. R. Milner. He uses them as the basis of a calculus of “Ɛ-numbers”, which he develops for the purpose of making physical applications. The covariantive nature of his calculus is, however, not always fully apparent, and raises some points of interest of which an examination is made in the present paper in terms of 3-dimensional projective geometry. The theory that emerges is the classical one of the collineations of projective 3-space that transform a quadric into itself, but the formulation is different from that of existing theories based on the same set of matrices and having the same or a similar geometrical background. For example, the present theory is quite different from that of 4-component spinors. The constants of multiplication γijk of quaternion algebra make their appearance in a generalized form and in a geometrical setting. In the final section an indication is given of possible generalizations to Riemannian geometry, and of the connection of the present work with the theory of Kähler manifolds of two complex dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES TO LITERATURE

Eddington, A. S., 1936. Relativity Theory of Protons and Electrons. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. W. H. T., 1905. Rummer's Quartic Surface. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilmister, C. W., 1953. “A note on Milner's ε-numbers”, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 218, 144148.Google Scholar
Kwal, B., 1934. “La théorie des équations de Maxwell et le calcul des opérateurs matriciels”, J. Phys. Radium (7), 5, 445448.Google Scholar
Milner, S. R., 1952. “The relation of Eddington's E-numbers to the tensor calculus”, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 214, 292329.Google Scholar
Muir, Thomas, 1923. The Theory of Determinants in the Historical Order of Development. Vol. IV, 306307 (van Elfrinkhof's formula).Google Scholar
Patterson, E. M., 1953. “A characterisation of Kähler manifolds in terms of parallel fields of planes”, J. Lond. Math. Soc., 28, 260269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, O., and Young, J.W., 1918. Projective Geometry. Vol. II. Ginn & Co., New York.Google Scholar
Watson, A. G. D., 1947. “On the geometry of the wave-equation”, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 43, 491505.Google Scholar
Zariski, O., 1932. “On a theorem of Eddington”, Amer. J. Math., 54, 466470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar