Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:22:10.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality assurance in maternity care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Marion H. Hall  and
Rosemary Currell
Marion H. Hall
Affiliation:
Aberdeen Maternity Hospital
Rosemary Currell
Affiliation:
NHS Information Management Centre, Birmingham
Get access

Synopsis

The quality of care for pregnant women and their babies must be a high priority to ensure the health of future generations. Unique features are the need to deal with at least two ‘patients’, that the process of parturition is usually normal, and that there is a long history of incorporating women's views into definitions of good care. Methods of assessing structure, process and outcome of care are described, and the limited evidence of their efficacy in improving care. High-quality care in the future will require collaboration between women, midwives, family doctors and obstetricians.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 101: Quality Assurance in Medical Care , 1993 , pp. 193 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, I. 1991. Family planning and pregnancy counselling projects for young people. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Barros, F. C., Vaughan, J. P., Victoria, C. G. & Huttly, S. R. A. 1991. Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil. British Medical Journal 303, 167–9.Google Scholar
Beech, B. L. & Robinson, J. 1992. Hard labour. Health Services Journal 102, 26–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Black, N. 1990. Quality assurance of medical care. Journal of Public Health Medicine 12, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botting, B. J., MacFarlane, A. J. & Price, F. V. 1990. Three, four or more. A study of triplets and higher order births. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. A., Leape, L. L., Laird, N. M., Herbert, L., Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A. G., Newhouse, J. P., Weiler, P. C. & Hiatt, H. H. 1992. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. New England Journal of Medicine 324, 370–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. S. 1988. Prenatal care. Reaching mothers, reaching infants. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. & MacFarlane, A. 1987. Where to be born? The debate and the evidence. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. 1964. Human relations and hospital care. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. & Keirse, M. J. N. C. 1989. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. & Gunn, P. 1987. Birthplace. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Services and the Welsh Office. Central Health Services Council. Standing maternity and Midwifery Advisory Committee. 1970. Domiciliary midwifery and maternity bed usage. Report of the Subcommittee (Chairman Sir John Peel), London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Donnison, J. 1977. Midwives and medical men. London: Heinneman.Google Scholar
Elbourne, D., Richardson, M., Chalmers, I., Waterhouse, I. & Holt, E. 1987. The Newbury maternity care study: A randomised controlled study to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 94, 612–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Examples of Monitoring and Evaluation, 1990. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organisations, Illinois.Google Scholar
Fleury, P. M. 1967. Maternity Care. Mothers' experiences of childbirth. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Flint, C. & Poulengeris, P. 1987. The know your midwife report. London. Flint, C., Peckarman's Wood, London SE26.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. 1981. Findings on antenatal care from community health council issues. Oxford: NPEU.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. 1989. Getting consumers' views of maternity care. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Gleicher, N. 1984. Caesarean section in the United States. The short term failure of the national consensus development conference in 1980. Journal American Medical Association 252, 3273–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. 1989. Repair of perineal trauma after childbirth. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., Keirse, M. J. N. C. (Eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, pp. 1170–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, M. H. 1987. When a woman asks for a caesarean section. British Medical Journal 294, 201–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, K. 1985. Childbearing, health and social priorities. A survey of 22774 consecutive births in Zaria, Northern Nigeria. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 92 (Suppl. 5).Google Scholar
Hillan, E. M. 1991. Research and audit. Women's views of caesarean section. In Roberts, H. (Ed.) Women's health matters, pp. 157–75. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hospital and Health Board Comparisons in Obstetrics, 1985–1987 (1989). Information and Statistics Division, Common Services Agency, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Inch, S. 1982. Birthrights. London: Hutchison.Google Scholar
King's Fund Forum Consensus Statement 1987 Screening for fetal and genetic abnormality. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, S. 1979. The good birth guide. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, S. 1983. The new good birth guide. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Lloyd, I. & Redman, C. 1983. A comparison of low risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 90, 118–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauder, I. 1991. Auditing necropsies. British Medical Journal 303, 1214–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leyland, A. H., Pritchard, C. W., McLoone, P. & Boddy, F. A. 1991. Measures of performance in Scottish maternity hospitals. British Medical Journal 303, 389–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llewelyn Davies, M. 1915. Maternity. Letters from working women. London: G. Bell and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A. G., Brennan, T. A., Laird, N. M., Herbert, L. E., Peterson, L. M., Newhouse, J. P., Weller, P. C. & Hiatt, H. H. 1991. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. New England Journal Medicine 325, 245–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomas, J., Anderson, G. M., Dominick-Pierre, K., Vayda, E., Enkin, M. W. & Hannah, W. J. 1989. Do practice guidelines guide practice? New England Journal Medicine 321, 1306–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomas, J., Enkin, M., Anderson, G. M., Hannah, W. J., Vayda, E. & Singer, J. 1991. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Journal American Medical Association 265, 2202–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, C., Lewis, M., Knox, E. G. & Crawford, J. S. 1990. Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth. British Medical Journal 301, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacFarlane, A. & Mugford, M. 1984. Birth counts. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
McLachlan, G. & Shegog, R. 1970. In the beginning (Studies in maternity services). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, V. 1989. Women's experience of maternity care – a survey manual. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Maternity Services. Second Report of the Health Committee, 1992. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health Report of the Maternity Services Committee, 1992. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health Report of the Maternity Services Committee, 1959. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Myers, S. A. & Gleicher, N. 1988. A successful program to lower caesarean section rates. New England Journal Medicine 319, 1511–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. 1980. Women confined. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. 1982. The origins and development of antenatal care. In Enkin, M. & Chalmers, I. (Ed.) Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care, pp. 1–23. London: Spastics International Medical Publications, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Olver, R. E. 1985. Impact of obstetric management on pulmonary function. In Beard, R. W. & Sharp, F. (Ed.) Preterm labour and its consequences, pp. 107–16. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
Patel, N. 1992. Maternal mortality – the way forward. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
Paterson, C. M. & Saunders, N. J. St. G. 1991. Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. British Medical Journal 303, 818–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, F. 1992. ‘Isn't she coping well?’ Providing for mothers of triplets, quadruplets and quintuplets. In Roberts, H. Women's health matters. pp. 121–40. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Raines, E. 1984. Professional liability in perspective. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 63, 839–45.Google Scholar
Rayner, C. 1962. Mothers and midwives. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
RCOG Medical Audit Unit, Second Bulletin, 1991. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
RCOG Medical Audit Unit, Third Bulletin, 1991. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, 1985–1987, 1991. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Report of the RCOG Working Party on Unplanned Pregnancy, 1991. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, K., Hepburn, M. & McIlwaine, G. 1982. An audit of caesarean section in a maternity district. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 89, 787–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, R., Remken, J. & Shoemack, P. 1985. Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Lancet ii, 429–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royston, E. & Armstrong, S. 1989. Preventing maternal deaths. Geneva: WHO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. S. 1990. Perioperative and perinatal death as measure for quality assurance. Quality Assurance in Health Core 2, 235–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stafford, R. S. 1990. Alternative strategies for controlling rising caesarean section rates. Journal American Medical Association 263, 683–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tew, M. 1990. Safer childbirth? London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twaddle, S. & Harper, V. 1992. Economic evaluation of daycare in the management of hypertension in pregnancy. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 99, 459–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed