Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T04:33:01.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Landscape development in Dutch coastal dunes: the breakdown and restoration of geomorphological and geohydrological processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

F. van der Meulen  and
P. D. Jungerius
F. van der Meulen
Affiliation:
Landscape and Environmental Research Group, University of Amsterdam, Dapperstraat 115, 1093 BS Amsterdam, Netherlands
P. D. Jungerius
Affiliation:
Landscape and Environmental Research Group, University of Amsterdam, Dapperstraat 115, 1093 BS Amsterdam, Netherlands
Get access

Synopsis

In Dutch coastal dunes, geomorphological and geohydrological processes have been adversely affected by intensive utilisation of the dunes. In the past, wide-scale stabilisation, notably for reasons of coastal defence, stopped nearly all aeolian activity. Rejuvenation did not take place and succession to mature-type ecosystems increased. Artificial infiltration with eutrophic river water and extraction of groundwater for drinking water catchment modified the geohydrology of the wet-dune environment.

Today, actions are being taken to restore geomorphological and geohydrological processes. Managing authorities join forces with universities and policy makers to strike the right balance between conflicting interests. Applied research helps to develop management strategies.

Two types of research are discussed: (a) geomorphological work on the development of blow-outs; (b) geohydrological work on the development of dune slacks. Questions considered are: do blow-outs grow to an unlimited extent or do they have optimum size and shape corresponding to aerodynamic conditions? Are there natural stabilisation mechanisms for blow-outs? What is the ecological impact of drinking water catchment? Which aspects should be considered to restore the dune slack environment in catchment areas?

Our findings are that blow-outs in The Netherlands have an optimum length:width ratio of about 2 with a blow-out length varying between 20 and 30 m. After 10–15 years without artificial stabilisation measures, the areas studied present an average of about one blow-out per hectare. Natural stabilisation mechanisms include algae which colonise deflation sites inside the blow-out and low secondary dunes which develop at the immediate leeward side of the blow-out. Blow-outs situated at or near downhill slopes of 6–12° may easily extend into larger deflation surfaces. Water erosion, probably caused by the water-repellency of humus-rich top soil, often precedes wind erosion on south- and south-east oriented slopes.

Drinking water production caused dessiccation of dune slacks and the disappearance of associated vegetation. In areas where infiltration with river water from outside the dunes is also applied, inudation and eutrophication drastically changed the dune environment. Nitrophilous plants appeared, especialy along banks of infiltration ponds, but also in seepage ponds. The plant cover depends on nutrient concentration of the (infiltrated) groundwater but especially on the flux of the groundwater. A high rate of flux leads to high nutrient loads, encouraging the growth and eventually dominance of nitrophilous plants. Restoration of dune slacks depends on the quality and the flux of the groundwater, on the streamlines of the groundwater flow in the dune body in relation to the orientation of the seepage ponds, on the presence of peaty or clayey adsorptive layers in the subsoil and possibly also on the presence of a rainwater lens occurring on top of the infiltration water.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 96: Coastal Sand Dunes , 1989 , pp. 219 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakker, T. W. M., Klijn, J. A. & van Zadelhoff, F. J. 1979. Duinen en duinvalleien. Een landschapsecologische studie van het Nederlandse duingebied. 201 pp. + maps. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Dijk, E. van, 1985. The impact of artificial dune infiltration on the nutrient content of ground and surface water. Biological Conservation 34, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, E. van, 1989. Ecological impact of drinking-water production in Dutch coastal dunes. In Perspectives in Coastal Dune Management, eds Meulen, F. van der, Jungerius, P. D. & Visser, J., pp. 163–182. The Hague: SPB Acad. Publ.Google Scholar
DWL. 1986. Duinwaterleiding van 's-Gravenhage. Onderzoek naar de kwaliteit van de depositie in de duinen van Meijendel. Internal report by J. van Puffelen, Laboratory, 9pp + app.Google Scholar
Hoed, M. A. den, Moberts, F. M. L. & Stuyfzand, P. J. 1987. Mogelijkheden voor een verschralend maaibeheer in twee (ver)natte duinterreinen. Landschapsecologische evaluatie van een natuurbeheers maatregel. KIWA Report nr SWE 86. 007. pp. 156 + app. Rijswijk: KIWA.Google Scholar
Hopman, A. & Jungerius, P. D. 1987. Zandverstuivingen in De Blink. Zuidhollands Landschap 3: 15.Google Scholar
Jungerius, P. D. and Meulen, F. van der, 1985. De ontwikkeling van stuifkuilen in het duinterrein Meijendel. Development of blow-outs in the coastal dunes of Meijendel (with English summary). Landschap 2, 143–151.Google Scholar
Jungerius, P. D. & Meulen, F. van der, 1988. Erosion processes in a dune landscape along the Dutch coast. Catena 15, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungerius, P. D. & Meulen, F. van der, 1989. The development of dune blow-outs, as measured with erosion pins and sequential air photos. Catena 16, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungerius, P. D., Verheggen, A. J. T. & Wiggers, A. J. 1981. The development of blow-outs in “De Blink”, a coastal dune area near Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 6, 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungerius, P. D., Witter, V. & Boxel, J. van. 1989. The use of standard metereological data to preduct blowout development in the coastal dunes of the Netherlands. Proceedings of the Conference on Landscape Ecological Impact of Climatic Change. Lunteren, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Meulen, F. van der, 1982. Vegetation changes and water catchment in a Dutch coastal dune area. Biological Conservation 24, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulen, F. van der, Jungerius, P. D. & Visser, J. 1989. Perspectives in Coastal Dune Management. The Hague: SPB Acad. Publ.Google Scholar
Meulen, F. van der, Jungerius, P. D. & Maarel, E. van der, 1989. Coastal defence alternatives and nature development perspectives. In Perspectives in Coastal Dune Management, eds Meulen, F. van der, Jungerius, P. D. & Visser, J., pp. 183–195. The Hague: SPB Acad. Publ.Google Scholar
Noest, V. 1987. Stabilisatie van stuifkuilen. De rol van vegetatie en dynamiek van het substraat. MSc Report University of Amsterdam and Dune Water Works, The Hague.Google Scholar
Noest, V., Maarel, E. van der, Meulen, F. van der & Laan, D. van der. 1989. Transformation of coverabundance values to optimize species response. Vegetatio (in press).Google Scholar
Pluis, J. L. A. & Winder, G. B. M. de. 1989. Spatial patterns in algal colonization of dune blow-outs. Catena 16, 376–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuyfzand, P. J. & Moberts, F. M. L. 1987. De bijzondere hydrologie van kwelplassen in duinen met kunstmatige infiltratie. H2O 3, 52–57.Google Scholar
Stuyfzand, P. J. & Stuurman, R. J. 1985. Experimenteel bewijs en modellering van een stationaire regenwaterlens op kunstmatig geinfiltreerd oppervlaktewater. H2O 18, 408–415.Google Scholar
Westhoff, V. & Held, A. J. den, 1969. Plantengemeenschappen van Nederland. 324 pp. Zutphen: Thieme & Cie.Google Scholar
Witter, V., Jungerius, P. D. & Harkel, M. ten, 1989. Modelling water erosion and the impact of water repellency Proceedings of the Conference on Landscape Ecological Impact of Climatic Change. Lunteren, The Netherlands.Google Scholar