Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T15:41:09.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The monitoring of breeding seabirds and eiders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

G. M. Dunnet  and
M. Heubeck
G. M. Dunnet
Affiliation:
Chairman, SOTEAG, Aberdeen
M. Heubeck
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB9 2TN, Scotland
Get access

Extract

Twenty-one species of seabirds breed regularly in Shetland, some of them in huge, spectacular, multi-species colonies on cliffs. The Sullom Voe Environmental Advisory Group Environmental Impact Statement (SVEAG 1976) provides a table showing the relative importance of seabird species in terms of Scotland and the British Isles. We have updated these data in the light of the Seabird Colony Register (Lloyd et al. 1991) and present data for seven species, vulnerable to oil pollution, in Table 1. It is clear that these populations are of national importance and indeed several are internationally important. Separately, an estimate was provided by SVEAG of the numbers of sea ducks and divers wintering in Shetland waters and updated estimates are given by Suddaby (1992) (Table 2). Chief among these is the eider duck (Somateria mollissima) which is apparently resident in Shetland throughout the year (Heubeck 1993a). In its Eighth Report, on Oil Pollution at Sea, the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1981) recognised the vulnerability of seabirds to oil pollution and this was clearly a matter of concern in Shetland and elsewhere when the flow of enormous quantities of crude oil into Sullom Voe via undersea pipelines and out of Sullom Voe by large tankers became a reality. The risk to seabirds of oil pollution is well documented (Bourne 1968; RSPB 1979). Dunnet (1974, 1980, 1982, 1987) has reviewed the situation in relation to the North Sea oil industry.

Type
Part Two
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 103: Monitoring at an Oil Terminal: The Shetland Experience , 1995 , pp. 137 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åhlund, M. & Göttmark, F. 1989. Gull predation on Eider ducklings Somateria mollissima: effects of human disturbance. Biological Conservation 48, 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averback, C., Korsch, M. & Vauk, G. 1992. Der Einfluss von Ölverschmutzungen auf Zeevögel an den deutschen Nordseeküsten von 1984 bis 1990. Seevögel 13, 12–16.Google Scholar
Avery, M. I., Burges, D., Dymond, J. N., Mellor, M. & Ellis, P. M. 1993. The status of Arctic Terns (Sterna paradisaea) in Orkney and Shetland in 1989. Seabird 15, 17–23.Google Scholar
Baillie, S. R. & Mead, C. J. 1982. The effects of severe oil pollution during the winter of 1980–81 on British and Irish auks. Ringing and Migration 4, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, T. R. 1977. The effect of habitat and density on breeding success in the Common Guillemot (Uria aalge). Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 751–64.Google Scholar
Blake, B. F. 1984. Diet and fish stock availability as possible factors in the mass death of auks in the North Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 76, 89–103.Google Scholar
Bourne, W. R. P. 1968. Oil pollution and bird populations. Field Studies 2 (suppl.), 99–121.Google Scholar
Bourne, W. R. P. 1976. Seabirds and pollution. In Johnston, R. (Ed.) Marine pollution pp. 403–502. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, J. C. 1984. The population dynamics of the Eider Duck Somateria mollissima and evidence of extensive non-breeding by adult ducks. Ibis 126, 525–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, J. C. 1968. Differences in the quality of birds nesting in the centre and on the edge of a colony. Nature 217, 478–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramp, S., Bourne, W. R. P. & Saunders, D. 1974. The Seabirds of Britain and Ireland London: Collins.Google Scholar
Dunnet, G. M. 1974. Impact of the oil industry on Scotland's coasts and birds. Scottish Birds 8, 3–16.Google Scholar
Dunnet, G. M. 1975. Seabird studies on Eynhallow. In Goodier, R. (Ed.) The natural environment of Orkney, pp. 129–40. Edinburgh: The Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Dunnet, G. M. 1980. Seabirds and oil pollution. In Energy in the balance, pp. 51–64. Guildford: Westbury.Google Scholar
Dunnet, G. M. 1982. Oil pollution and seabird populations. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London B297, 343–427.Google Scholar
Dunnet, G. M. 1987. Seabirds and North Sea oil. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B316, 51–524.Google Scholar
Foxton, P. & Heubeck, M. 1995. Response to the Esso Bernicia oil spill. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 103B, 233–45.Google Scholar
Hamer, K. C., Furness, R. W. Caldow, R. W. G. 1991. The effects of changes in food availability on the breeding ecology of great skuas Catharacta skua in Shetland. Journal of Zoology, Lond. 223, 175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamer, K. C., Monaghan, P., Uttley, J. D., Walton, P. & Burns, M. D. 1993. The influence of food supply on the breeding ecology of Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla in Shetland. Ibis 135, 255–63.Google Scholar
Harris, M. P. 1976. The seabirds of Shetland in 1974. Scottish Birds 9, 37–68.Google Scholar
Harris, M. P. 1987. A low-input method of Monitoring Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) breeding success. Biological Conservation 41, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. P. 1989. Development of monitoring of seabird populations and performance: final report to N.C.C. NCC CSD. Rpt. 941.Google Scholar
Harris, M. P. & Bailey, R. S. 1992. Mortality rates of puffin Fratercula arctica and guillemot Uria aalge and fish abundance in the North Sea. Biological Conservation 60, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heubeck, M. 1987. Changes in the status of the Common Eider in Shetland, 1977–1984. Scottish Birds 14, 146–52.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M. (ed.) 1989. Seabirds and sandeels: Proceedings of a Seminar held in Lerwick, Shetland, 5–16th. October 1988. Shetland Bird Club.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M. 1993a. Moult flock surveys indicate a continued decline in the Shetland Eider population, 1984–92. Scottish Birds 17, 77–84.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M. 1993b. Eider mortality in Shetland in early 1980. Shetland Bird Report 1992, 95–101.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M. & Richardson, M. G. 1980. Bird mortality following the Esso Bernicia oil spill, Shetland, December 1978. Scottish Birds 11, 97–108.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M., Harvey, P. V. & Okill, J. D. 1991. Changes in the Shetland Guillemot Uria aalge population and the pattern of recoveries of ringed birds, 1959–90. Seabird 13, 3–21.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M., Harvey, P. V. & Robertson, I. S. 1987. Chick production at Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla colonies in Shetland 1986. Seabird 10, 34–42.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M., Meek, E. & Suddaby, D. 1992. The occurrence of dead auks Alcidae on beaches in Orkney and Shetland, 1976–1991. Sula 6, 1–18.Google Scholar
Heubeck, M., Richardson, M. G. & Dore, C. P. 1986. Monitoring numbers of Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla in Shetland. Seabird 9, 32–42.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. & Mead, C. J. 1984. Origin and ages of auks wrecked in eastern Britain in February–March 1983. Bird Study 31, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, C., Tasker, M. L. & Partridge, K. 1991. The status of seabirds in Britain and Ireland. London: T. & A.D. Poyser.Google Scholar
Martin, A. R. 1989. The diet of Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica and Northern Gannet Sula bassana chicks at a Shetland colony during a period of changing prey availability. Bird Study 34, 170–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, C. J. 1981. The Black Death. BTO News 112, 1.Google Scholar
Milne, H. 1974. Breeding numbers and reproductive rate of Eiders at the Sands of Forvie National Nature Reserve, Scotland. Ibis 116, 135–54.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Uttley, J. D., Burns, M. D., Thaine, C. & Blackwood, J. 1989. The relationship between food supply, reproductive effort and breeding success in Arctic Terns Sterna paradisaea. Journal of Animal Ecology 58, 261–74.Google Scholar
Mudge, G. P., Crooke, C. H. and Aspinall, S. J. 1992. Non-oiling Guillemot mortality incidents in the Moray Firth, 1983–86. Seabird 14, 48–54.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. E. 1981. Monitoring for conservation: the Kittiwake in Shetland. M.Sc. Thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. G. 1985. Status and distribution of the Kittiwake in Shetland in 1981. Bird Study 32, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. G., Dunnet, G. M. & Kinnear, P. K. 1981. Monitoring Seabirds in Shetland. Proceedings of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 80B, 157–79.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1981. Eighth report: Oil pollution of the sea. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds 1979. Marine oil pollution and birds. Sandy: RSPB.Google Scholar
Stowe, T. J. 1982. Beached bird surveys and surveillance of cliff-nesting seabirds. Report to Nature Conservancy Council. RSPB: Sandy.Google Scholar
Suddaby, D. 1992. Winter Seabird Monitoring Project, Shetland 1991–1992. Updated Report to the Nature Conservancy Council for Scotland.Google Scholar
Sullom Voe Environmental Advisory Group 1976. Oil terminal at Sullom Voe: Environmental impact assessment. Shetland: Thuleprint.Google Scholar
Tasker, M. L., Webb, A., Hall, A. J., Pienkowski, M. W. & Langslow, D. R. 1987. Seabirds in the North Sea. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Underwood, L. A. & Stowe, T. J. 1984. Massive wreck of seabirds in eastern Britain. Bird Study 31, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uttley, J. D., Walton, P., & Monaghan, P. & Austin, G. 1994. The effects of food abundance on breeding performance and adult time budgets of common guillemots, Uria aalge. Ibis 136, 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, P. M., Sears, J. & Heubeck, M. 1991. Seabird numbers and breeding success in 1990. Nature Conservancy Council C.S.D. Report. 1235.Google Scholar
Wright, P. J. & Bailey, M. C. 1993. Biology of Sandeels in the vicinity of Seabird Colonies at Shetland. SOAFD Fisheries Research Report 15/93.Google Scholar