Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T12:21:06.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tributyltin contamination and its impact on Nucella lapillus populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

S.K. Bailey ,
I.M. Davies  and
M.J.C. Harding
S.K. Bailey
Affiliation:
SOAFD Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB9 8DB, Scotland
I.M. Davies
Affiliation:
SOAFD Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB9 8DB, Scotland
M.J.C. Harding
Affiliation:
SOAFD Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB9 8DB, Scotland
Get access

Synopsis

Common dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) show a characteristic response to exposure to tributyltin compounds. Females develop male sexual characteristics, a phenomenon termed imposex. Dogwhelks have been collected for assesment of imposex from sites throughout Sullom Voe and Yell Sound in 1987, 1990 and 1991.

Results of the 1991 survey have indicated that dogwhelks were completely absent from the terminal area, on the promontory of Calback Ness. The degree of imposex was highest in the population from Kames, the site closest to the terminal. Juveniles were completely absent from this site. Incidence of imposex was high in populations throughout the Voe and 91% of the females examined from within the Voe were reproductively unviable due to blockage of their reproductive tracts with vas deferens tissue. Outside the Voe, in the well flushed waters of Yell Sound, imposex was much lower, but only fell to levels associated with populations from areas distant from tributyltin (TBT) contamination in the two most northerly sites surveyed.

Results of the survey have indicated that activities associated with the oil terminal are the source of TBT contamination to the area, and that contamination arising from the terminal operations has not only affected dogwhelks in Sullom Voe, but populations throughout Yell Sound.

Comparison of the imposex levels from 1987 and 1990 data indicates that the reproductive capacity of females has progressively declined and that populations within the Voe are gradually being eliminated. Forty-six percent of females sampled from populations within the Voe were sterile in 1987, compared to 65% in 1990, and 91% in 1991. In 1987, both adult and juvenile dogwhelks were present in the jetty area, although 94.5% of the females were sterile. In 1990, juveniles were absent from this area, and all females were sterile. No dogwhelks were found in the terminal area during the 1991 survey and, at Kames, the next closest site, juveniles were absent.

Type
Part Two
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 103: Monitoring at an Oil Terminal: The Shetland Experience , 1995 , pp. 113 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, S. K., 1990. Sullom Voe 1990. Report to the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries of Scotland on field work undertaken in Sullom Voe, Shetland (6–8 March 1990). Department of Biological Sciences, Napier Polytechnic of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. K., & Davies, I. M., 1989. Survey of the effects of tributyltin on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) from Scottish coastal waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 69, 335–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S. K., & Davies, I. M., 1990. The continuing impact of TBT used in mariculture on dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus L.) populations in a Scottish sea loch. Proceedings of the Third International Organotin Symposium, Monaco, 17–20 April 1990, pp. 222–5.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. K., & Davies, I. M., 1988. Tributyltin contamination around an oil terminal in Sullom Voe, Shetland. Environmental Pollution 55, 161–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, S. K., Davies, I. M., Harding, M. J. C., & Shanks, A. M., 1991. Effects of tributyltin oxide on the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus (L). In: Proceedings of the 10th World Meeting, ORTEP Association, Berlin pp. 6–66.Google Scholar
Blaber, S. J., 1970. The occurrence of a penis–like out-growth behind the right tentacle in spent females of Nucella lapillus. Proceedings of the Malacological Society 39, 231–3.Google Scholar
Blackman, D. L., Graff, J., & Vassie, J. M., 1981. Tidal currents in Yell Sound and the outer region of Sullom Voe. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 80B, 73–90.Google Scholar
Bryan, G. W., Gibbs, P. E., Hummerstone, L. G., & Burt, G. R., 1986. The decline of the gastropod Nucella lapillus around southwest England: Evidence for the effect of tributyltin from antifouling paints. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 66, 611–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crothers, J. H., 1985. Dogwhelks: An introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.). Field Studies 6, 291–360.Google Scholar
Davies, I. M., & Bailey, S. K., 1991. The impact of tributyltin from large vessels on dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) populations around Scottish oil ports. Marine Environmental Research 32, 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, H. D., 1981. Oceanographic observations in Sullom Voe, Shetland, in the period 1974–1978. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 80B, 55–71.Google Scholar
Gibbs, P. E., Bryan, G. W., Pascoe, P. L., & Burt, G. R., 1987. The use of the dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus, as an indicator of tributyltin (TBT) contamination. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 67, 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L. W., & Pinkney, A. E., 1985. Acute and sublethal effects of organotin compounds on aquatic biota: an interpretative literature evaluation. CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology 14, 159–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IMO, 1989. International Maritime Organisation, Scientific Group on Dumping, 12th meeting, April 1989. Assessment of organotin compounds as marine pollutants and proposed measures for the Mediterranean.Google Scholar
IPCS (International Programme on Chemical Safety), 1990. Tributyltin compounds, Environmental Health Criteria 116. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
Laughlin, R. B., & Linden, O., 1987. Tributyltin, contemporary environmental issue. Ambio 16, 252–6.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1936. The biology of Purpura lapillus. I. Shell variation in relation to the environment. Journal of the Marine Biological Association 21, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, M. D., Renberg, L., & Rippen, G., 1989. Tributyltin in the environment – sources, fate and determination. An assessment of present status and research needs. Chemosphere 18, 2015–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar