Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Elöd, Egon
and
Zahn, Helmut
1960.
Die Prüfung der Textilien.
p.
1.
Article contents
XVIII.—Histochemical Studies of Keratin Fibres
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2012
Extract
During a study of the micro-structure of keratin fibres (Stoves, 1944) it was found that certain members of the Mustelidæ, e.g. kolinsky (M. Sibirica), ermine (M. erminœ), and Jap mink (M. itatsi), possess primary hairs with well-developed cuticle, cortex, and medulla. In the case of rabbits and hares (Leporidæ), however, the corresponding fibres are composed almost entirely of medulla cells. The two types of fibres, therefore, provide suitable material for studying the chemical reactivity of the keratin constituting cuticle, cortex, and medulla of animal hair. Accordingly, the effect of various reagents upon transverse sections of fibres from the above-mentioned animals was examined, and a preliminary report of the results has already been made (Stoves, 1943 a). A more detailed account of the work now appears.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , 1946 , pp. 132 - 136
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1946
References
References to Literature
Allwörden, K. von, 1916. “Die Eigenshaften der Schafwolle und eine neue Untersuchungsmethode zum Nachweis geschadigter Wolle auf chemischem Wege,” Zeits. angew. Chem., XXIX, 77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. J., Reeves, R. E., and Stodola, F. H., 1937. “The chemistry of the lipids of tubercle bacilli. LI. Concerning the firmly bound lipids of the human tubercle bacillus,” Journ. Biol. Chem., CXXI, 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barritt, J., and King, A. T., 1929. “The Sulphur Content of Wool. III. Effects of Chemical Processing on Sulphur Content,” Journ. Text. Inst., XX, T 159—161.Google Scholar
Bekker, J. G., and King, A. T., 1931. “Sulphur Distribution in the Component Structures of Wool and Porcupine Quill,” Biochem. Journ., XXV, 1077–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, R., 1934. “The Use of Trypsin for the determination of the resistance of wool fibres to Bacterial Disintegration,” Journ. Text. Inst., XXV, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel-Conrat, F., and Cooper, M., 1944. “The Use of Dyes for the determination of acid and basic groups in proteins,” Journ. Biol. Chem., CLIV, 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, W. B., 1944. “The Scale Substance of Wool,” Amer. Dyestuff Reporter, XXX, 117–118.Google Scholar
Geiger, W. B., Patterson, W. I., Mizell, L. R., and Harris, M., 1941. “Nature of the resistance of wool to digestion by enzymes,” Journ. Res. Nat. Bureau Stand., XXVII, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, D. R., and Michaelis, L., 1934. “A Study on Keratin,” Journ. Biol. Chem., CVI, 605–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. O., 1937. “Fibre Structure in Relation to Fur Dyeing,” Journ. Soc. Dyers and Col., LIII, 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, R., 1936. “Untersuchungen über die Färbevorgänge am Wollhaar,” Helv. Chim. Acta, XIX, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, R., and Holl, F. W., 1936. “Die Zerlegung der Wolle in ihre histologischen Bestandteile,” Kolloid Zeits., CXXV, 212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, C., and Lehmann, E., 1926. “Kritische Untersuchungen über die Spezifitatsbreite histochemischer Fettdifferenzierungsmethoden,” Zentralbl. allg. Path., XXXVII, 145–152; “Sind die in der histologischen Technik gebrauchlichen Fettdifferenzierungsmethoden spezifisch?” Arch. path. Anat., CCLXI, 623–648.Google Scholar
Kay, W. W., and Whitehead, R., 1935. “The Staining of Fat with Sudan IV,” Journ. Path. Bact., XLI, 303–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, D. J., and Marriott, R. H., 1933. “The Distribution of Sulphur in Goat Hair,” Biochem. Journ., XXVII, 911–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olcott, H. S., 1943. “Cystine Content and Enzyme Digestibility of Powdered Hoof Proteins,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., LIV, 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Routh, J. I., and Edwards, B., 1944. “Chemical Studies on Powdered Keratins,” Journ. Biol. Chem., CLIV, 593–596.Google Scholar
Routh, J. I., and Lewis, H. B., 1938. “Enzymatic Digestion of Wool,” Journ. Biol. Chem., CXXIV, 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, K. M., 1941. “The Structure of the Hair Cuticle,” Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc., 13–18.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. L., Greenberg, D. M., and Chapman, L. M., 1927. “Studies on the Nature of the Combination between Certain Acid Dyes and Proteins,” Journ. Biol. Chem., LXXII, 707–728.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. L., and Rawlins, L. M. C., 1929. “Studies on Combination between Certain Basic Dyes and Proteins,” Journ. Biol. Chem., LXXXII, 709–716; “Mode of Combination between Certain Dyes and Gelatine Granules,” Journ. Biol. Chem., LXXXVIII, 271–284.Google Scholar
Schultz, A., 1925. “Uber Cholesterinesterverfettung,” Verh. deuts.path. Ges., XX, 120–123.Google Scholar
Speakman, J. B., 1941. Mather Lecture, “The Chemistry of Wool and Related Fibres,” Journ. Text. Inst., XXXII, T 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speakman, J. B., and McMahon, P. R., 1938. “Sulphur content of the Intercellular Phase of the Wool Fibre,” Nature, CXLI, 118–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoves, J. L., 1942. “The Histology of Mammalian Hair,” Analyst, LXVII, 385–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoves, J. L., 1943 b. “The Reactivity of the Cystine Linkage in Keratin Fibres. Part I. The Action of Alkalis,” Trans. Faraday Soc., XXXVIII, 254–261.Google Scholar
Stoves, J. L., 1944. “The Appearance in Cross-section of the Hairs of some Carnivores and Rodents,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, LXII, 99–104.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt-Leitz, E., and Schuckmann, G. V., 1929. “Zur Struktur tierischer Skelettsubstanzen,” Berichte, LXII, 1891–1896.Google Scholar
Whewell, C. S., and Selim, A., 1944. “Action of Halogens on Wool,” Journ. Soc. Chem. Ind., LXIII, 121–123.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by