Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:02:11.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXIV.—The Use of Rats for Pressor Assays of Pituitary Extracts, with a Note on Response to Histamine and Adrenaline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

F. W. Landgrebe
Affiliation:
Beit Memorial Fellow, Departments of Natural History and Materia Medica, University of Aberdeen.
M. H. I. Macaulay
Affiliation:
Kilgour Research Scholar, Departments of Natural History and Materia Medica, University of Aberdeen.
H. Waring
Affiliation:
Departments of Natural History and Materia Medica, University of Aberdeen.
Get access

Extract

Intravenous injection of posterior lobe pituitary extracts into spinal or anæsthetised mammals has several effects. One is to elevate blood pressure. Two animal preparations are commonly used for the biological assay of this activity. Most American workers seem to favour a dog deeply anæsthetised with chloretone or chloralose. 10 per cent, accuracy is claimed. We have no experience of this preparation. There have been very few tracings published and those that we have seen do not inspire confidence. This apart, a method employing dogs is unlikely to find favour in this country because of the difficulty of obtaining, feeding, and housing suitable animals. Most workers in this country use the spinal cat. As originally described by Dale and Laidlaw (1912), the method employing this preparation was insensitive and open to grave errors. Hogben et al. (1924), after intensive study, showed that it could be sensitive, reliable, and susceptible of good discrimination. The Hogben procedure has been generally adopted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Burn, J. H., 1937. Biological Standardisation, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Creaser, C. W., and Gorbman, A., 1939. “Species specificity of the gonadotropic factor in vertebrates,” Quart. Rev. Biol., XIV, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, H., and Laidlaw, P., 1912. “A Method of Standardising Pituitary (Infundibular) Extracts,” Journ. Pharmacol., IV, 75.Google Scholar
Elliot, T. R., 1912. “The Control of the Suprarenal Glands by the Splanchnlc Nerves,” Journ. Physiol., XLIV, 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorbman, A., 1941. “Comparative anatomy and physiology of the Anterior Pituitary,” Quart. Rev. Biol., XVI, 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogben, L., 1927. The Comparative Physiology of Internal Secretion, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hogben, L., and Schlapp, W., 1924. “Studies on the Pituitary. III. The Vasomotor Activity of Pituitary Extracts throughout the Vertebrate Series,” Quart. Journ. Exp. Physiol., XIV, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogben, L., Schlapp, W., and MacDonald, A. D., 1924. “Studies on the Pituitary. IV. Quantitative Comparison of Pressor Activity,” Quart. Journ. Exp. Physiol., XIV, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Medical Research, 1936. “On the International standard Pituitary (Posterior Lobe) Powder, League of Nations Health Organisation,” Dept. Biol. Standards, Mem. 36.Google Scholar
Simon, A., 1937. “Über die Wirkung des Serumspätigytes auf den Blutdruck der dekapitierten Ratte,” Archiv. exper. Path. Pharmak., CLXXXVII, 678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar