Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T11:02:17.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXV.—Observations on the Birthcoats and Skins of Several Breeds and Crosses of British Sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

A. S. Fraser  and
M. K. O. Hamada
A. S. Fraser
Affiliation:
Genetics Laboratory, Animal Breeding and Genetics Research Organisation, Edinburgh.
M. K. O. Hamada
Affiliation:
Genetics Laboratory, Animal Breeding and Genetics Research Organisation, Edinburgh.
Get access

Synopsis

The birthcoats of both coarse and fine-fleeced sheep can be separated into different types of fibres. Each type of fibre is formed by a particular type of follicle. The ratios of the different types of follicles are the same in all the breeds of British sheep studied, and therefore variation of the follicle population can be excluded as a factor in the evolution of the British types of fleeces. Some birthcoats are coarse, others are fine, and some birthcoats are short, others long. The two differences are independent both developmentally and genetically. In the few lambs studied, the coarse type is dominant over the fine type, and the short type is dominant over the long type. It is suggested that the Down shortwool fleece evolved along a different route from that which gave rise to the Merino shortwool fleece.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , 1952 , pp. 462 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bergen, W., and Mauersberger, H. R., 1948. The American Wool Handbook, New York.Google Scholar
Burns, R. H., 1933. “Wool inheritance in Hampshire-Rambouillet crosses”, Wyoming Agr. Expt. Station Bull., 196.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B., 1942. “Density and some related characters of the fleece in the Australian Merino”, Journ. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. (Aust.), xv, 217–220.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B., 1943. “Studies in the biology of the skin and fleece of sheep”, Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. (Aust.) Bull., 164.Google Scholar
Crew, F. A. E., 1921. “On the fleeces of certain primitive species of sheep”, Ann. App. Biol., VIII, 164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crew, F. A. E., and Blyth, J. S. S., 1923. “On fibres of ‘intermediate’ character found in the fleece of Ovis vignei”, Ann. App. Biol., X, 295–300.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W., 1931. “The use of covers on Lambs in bioLogicaL work on wool”, Nature, CXXVII, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, F. W., 1934. “Hairy fibres of the Romney sheep”, N.Z. Journ. Agr., XLVIII, 1–40.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W., 1940. “Recent work in the wool zoology of the New Zealand Romney”, N.Z. Journ. Sci. Tech., XXII, 209–220.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W., and Fraser, A. S., 1947. “Mendelian inheritance in Romney sheep”, N.Z. Sci. Cong., 243–245.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. S., 1951 a. “Competition between skin follicles in sheep”, Nature, CLXVII, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. S., 1951 b. “The growth of wool fibres in sheep”. [In preparation.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galpin, N. M., 1948. “A study of wool growth”, Journ. Agr. Sci., XXXVII, 275–286.Google Scholar