^{page 229 note *} This shield was quite destroyed in 1829.

^{page 230 note *} Mr. Willement has fancied that the field was party per pale and was unable to state the tinctures with certainty. He has also mis-copied the inscription, reading “Monte acuto” for “Monte alto” He was aware, however, that something was wrong either in the coat or the inscription. Holand gives the inscription as at the present time

page 230 note † Mr Willement has not recorded that the head supporting the guige from the dexter corner of this shield remains

page 230 note ‡ A vestige of this inscription, above the hollow, remains, though unnoticed by Mr. Willement.

^{page 231 note *} These inscriptions remain, though unnoticed by Mr. Willement.

page 231 note † This coat remained in 1715, being noticed in Crull's Antiquities of St. Peter's, Westminster, at page 260, where he directs his reader to a monument ‘under the arms of Gulielmus de Malpas’ The epitaph on the monument (to the wife of Randolph Egerton) alludes to the fact of the Malpas coat being in the neighbourhood.