Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T06:52:26.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Cybernetic Analysis of Goal-Directedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Thomas W. Simon
Thomas W. Simon*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The issue of the admissibility into scientific discourse of teleological terms such as ‘function', ‘goal-direction, ‘purpose’ and ‘goal’ has not received widespread attention in recent years. In a provocative book, On Purposeful Systems, Ackoff and Emery claim that “the lack of more recent debate seems…no more than scholarly collusion in agreeing not to raise embarrassing questions” ([11], p. 15). Most of those who have attended to teleological problems have attempted to show that these teleological terms are eliminable in favor of non-teleological terms. ‘Function’ has been analyzed in this manner by Nissen [12], Nagel [11], Canfield [6], Hempel [8] et al. ‘Goal-direction’ and ‘purpose’ have been given similar treatment by Braithwaite [4], Nagel [11], Sommerhoff [21][22], inter alia. Notable exceptions to these reductionist analyses occur in the works of C. Taylor [23] and Wright [27].

Type
Part II. Explanation
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1976 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1976 , 1976 , pp. 56 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackoff, Russell L. and Emery, Fred E. On Purposeful Systems. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. Ross. An Introduction to Cybernetics. London:: Chapman and Hall, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckner, Morton. The Biological Way of Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, Richard B. Scientific Explanation. New York: Harper and Row, 1969.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter (ed.). Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.Google Scholar
Canfield, John V. “Teleological Explanations in Biology.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (1964): 285-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchman, C.W. and Ackoff, R.L. “Purposive Behavior and Cybernetics.” Social Forces 29 (October 1950): 32-39. (As reprinted in [5]. Pages 243-249).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. “The Logic of Functional Analysis.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965. Pages 297-330.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. “Teleological and Teleonomic, a New Analysis.” In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. XIV. Edited by Cohen, Robert S. and Wartofsky, Marx W.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1974. Pages 91-117.Google Scholar
McFarland, D.J. Feedback Mechanisms in Animal Behavior. New York: Academic, 1971.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernst. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, Lowell. “Neutral Functional Statement Schemata.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 251-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, William T. Behavior: The Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.Google Scholar
Powers, William T. “Feedback: Beyond Behaviorism.” Science 179 (1973): 351-356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbleuth, Arturo, Wiener, Norbert and Bigelow, Julian. “Behavior, Purpose and Teleology.” Philosophy of Science 10 (1943): 18-24. (As reprinted in [5]. Pages 221-225.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbleuth, Arturo and Wiener, Norbert. “Purposeful and Non-Purposeful Behavior.” Philosophy of Science 17 (1950): 318-326. (As reprinted in [5]. Pages 232-237.)Google Scholar
Sayre, Kenneth M. Consciousness. New York: Random House, 1969.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Israel. Anatomy of Inquiry. New York: Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Israel. “Thoughts on Teleology.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (1958): 264-284.Google Scholar
Simon, Thomas. “Control Systems and Teleological Systems.” Behavioral Science 20 (1975): 325-330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerhoff, G. “The Abstract Characteristics of Living Systems.” In Systems Thinking. Edited by Emery, F.E.. Baltimore: Penquin, 1969. Pages 147-202.Google Scholar
Sommerhoff, G. Logic of the Living Brain. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. The Explanation of Behaviour. New York: Humanities, 1964.Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard. “Comments on a Mechanistic Conception of Purposefulness.” Philosophy of Science 17 (1950): 310-317. (As reprinted in [5]. Pages 226-231.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Richard. “Purposeful and Non-Purposeful Behavior: A Rejoinder.” Philosophy of Science 17 (1950): 327-332. (As reprinted in [5]. Pages 238-242.).Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. “Some Problems with the Concept of ‘Feedback’.” In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. VIII. Edited by Buck, Roger C. and Cohen, Robert S.. Dortrecht: D. Reidel, 1971. Pages 241-256.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. “Explanation and Teleology.” Philosophy of Science 39 (1972): 204-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar