Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T20:14:04.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mathematical Physics and Elementary Logic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Brent Mundy*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University

Extract

Modern mathematical physics uses real-number variables, and therefore presupposes set theory. (A real number is defined as a certain kind of set or sequence of natural or rational numbers.) Set theory is also used to define the operations of differential calculus, needed to state physical laws as differential equations constraining the numerical variables representing physical quantities. The derivative f' = df(t)/dt is defined as the limit of an infinite sequence of terms [f(t+e)-f(t)]/e as e → 0, and this definition can only be expressed in a language allowing reference to infinite sequences. Moreover, closure under these limit operations again requires the underlying field of numbers to be Dedekind complete, hence to include all of the reals.

The possibility that mathematical physics depends essentially upon set theory is disturbing, for two distinct reasons. From a logical viewpoint, it is disturbing that an important branch of natural science should depend upon a part of logic or mathematics whose status remains uncertain and controversial.

Type
Part V. Physics
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behnke, H., Bachmann, R., Fladt, K., and Süss, W. (eds.) (1974), Fundamentals of Mathematics, vol. 3: Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. (1984), “Synthetic Mechanics”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 13: 379395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, H. (1980), Science Without Numbers. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
Glymour, C. (1980), Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
Ince, E. L. (1926), Ordinary Differential Equations. Longmans, Green and Co. Reprinted by Dover Publications, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1960), Word and Object. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1976), “Whither Physical Objects?”, in Cohen, R. S. (ed.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Dordrecht: Reidel pp. 497504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar