Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T05:36:23.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Henry J. Folse
Henry J. Folse*
Affiliation:
Loyola University, New Orleans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The so-called “orthodox” interpretation of quantum physics attributed to Niels Bohr is commonly regarded as abandoning realism. I have already opposed this view elsewhere (Folse 1985) but partially in response to criticism of my position (Shimony 1985), here I propose to relate Bohr’s realism to recent contributions to the realism debate given by Hacking (1983), Cartwright (1983), and Ellis (1985). Specifically, I argue that Bohr’s complementarity viewpoint requires a causal entity realism. Furthermore, labeling Bohr an anti-realist with respect to theories is misleading because it assumes the correspondence theory of truth that Bohr holds quantum theory forces us to reject.

Although there are many realist views, I take the root of realism to be the quest for knowledge about the reality producing the phenomena we experience. It is realism in this sense that Bohr defended and that makes science significant to metaphysics.

Type
Part I. Physics
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1986 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1986 , 1986 , pp. 96 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohr, Niels. (1927). “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Physios.” Nature 121: 580–590. (As reprinted and revised in Bohr (1934).Pages 52-91.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, Niels (1929a). “Atomteorien og Grundprincipperne for Naturbeskrivelsen.” Fyaisk Tidsakrift 27: 103–114. (As reprinted as “The Atomic Theory and the Fundamental Principles underlying the Description of Nature.” In Bohr (1934). Pages 102-119.)Google Scholar
Bohr, Niel (1929b). “H irkungsquantum und Naturbesehrelbung.” Die Naturwissensohaft 17: 483-186. (As reprinted as “The Quantum of Action and the Description of Nature.” In Bohr (1934). Pages 92-101.)Google Scholar
Bohr, Niels. (1934). Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bohr, Niels. (1937). “Causality and Complementarity.” Philosophy of Science 4: 289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, Niels. (1939). “Natural Philosophy and Human Cultures.” Nature 143: 268–272. (As reprinted in Bohr (1958). Pages 23-31.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, Niels. (1955). “Science and the Unity of Knowledge.” In The Unity of Knowledge. Edited by Lewis Leary. New York: Doubleday and Co. Pages 47-62. (As reprinted in Bohr (1958). Pages 67-82.)Google Scholar
Bohr, Niels. (1958). Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bohr, Niels. (1962). Interview conducted by T.S. Kuhn. Copenhagen: 17 Nov. 62. Archive for the History of Quantum Phvaioa. Tape 36a. Cartwright, Nancy. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELlis, Brian. (1985). “What Science Aims to Do.” In Images of Science. Edited by Churchland, Paul M. and Hooker, Clifford A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pages 48-74.Google Scholar
Folse, Henry. (1985). The Philospphy of Niels Bohr: The. Framework of Complementarity. Amsterdam: North-Holland Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1963a). Interview conducted by T.S. Kuhn. Munich: 25 Feb. 63. Archive for the History of Quantum Physics. Tape 53a.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1963b). Interview conducted by T.S. Kuhn. Munich: 28 Feb. 63. Archive for the History of Quantum Physics. Tape 53b.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner. (1964). “Quantum Theory and Its Interpretation.” In Niels Bohr: His Life and Work a3 seen by HJ3 Friends and Colleagues. Edited by S. Rozental. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Pages 94–108.Google Scholar
Shimony, Abne. (1985). “Review” of Folse 1985. Physics Today 38: 108–109.Google Scholar