Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:44:26.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association between clinically depressed subgroups, type of treatment and patient retention in the LIDO study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2003

P. BECH
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; Universidad Internacional de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel; Health Research Associates, Seattle, WA and Health Economics Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
R. LUCAS
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; Universidad Internacional de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel; Health Research Associates, Seattle, WA and Health Economics Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
M. AMIR
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; Universidad Internacional de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel; Health Research Associates, Seattle, WA and Health Economics Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
D. BUSHNELL
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; Universidad Internacional de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel; Health Research Associates, Seattle, WA and Health Economics Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
M. MARTIN
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; Universidad Internacional de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel; Health Research Associates, Seattle, WA and Health Economics Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
D. BUESCHING
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; Universidad Internacional de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel; Health Research Associates, Seattle, WA and Health Economics Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Abstract

Background. Few data are available with which to evaluate the association between depressed subgroups, type of treatment and patient retention during episodes of major depression.

Method. This observational study followed 1117 depressed patients over a 12-month period in the primary care setting of six different international sites. The patients were divided into three severity-linked subgroups: moderate to severe depression; moderate depression co-morbid with serious medical conditions; and mild depression.

Results. In general, a low dropout rate was found, with significant differences in the rates across the six sites. However, while there was no statistical significance in the association between the three subgroups of depression and overall dropout rates, we did find that older patients were less likely to drop out, more depressed patients were more likely to drop out, and if patients were on antidepressants they were less likely to drop out. Among the three subgroups of depression, patients with moderate depression co-morbid with serious medical conditions received the lowest amount of antidepressants and had the lowest quality of life.

Conclusion. Although the overall dropout rate in this study was found very low and did differ between the six sites, an association between the use of antidepressants and patient retention was seen. The group of patients with serious co-morbid medical conditions received fewer antidepressants even when the level of their depressive states was taken into consideration. This group was the least satisfied with treatment and had the lowest self-reported quality of life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Details of the LIDO study will be found on page 1058.