Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-mpvvr Total loading time: 0.238 Render date: 2021-07-31T20:02:13.665Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Direct comparison of first-contact versus longitudinal register-based case finding in the same population: early evidence that the incidence of schizophrenia may be three times higher than commonly reported

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2014

S. J. Hogerzeil
Affiliation:
Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands
A. M. van Hemert
Affiliation:
Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
F. R. Rosendaal
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
E. Susser
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
H. W. Hoek
Affiliation:
Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Background.

The incidence of schizophrenia is commonly estimated by screening for psychosis among subjects presenting to psychiatric services. This approach (using a first-contact sampling frame) cannot account for cases that did not meet criteria for schizophrenia at first contact. We compared the usual approach directly with a register-based approach (using a longitudinal sampling frame) that also includes subjects initially diagnosed with other non-schizophrenic disorders.

Method.

We compared data from the Longitudinal Psychiatric Register (LPR) of The Hague over 1980–2009 with data previously collected in a first-contact study, and applied both methods to calculate the incidence of schizophrenia for subjects aged 20–54 years in the same catchment area and over the same period (October 2000 to September 2005). We reconstructed treatment pathways and diagnostic histories up to the end of 2009 and performed sensitivity analyses.

Results.

The LPR identified 843 first onsets of schizophrenia, corresponding to a treated incidence rate (IR) of 69 per 100 000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 64–74]. The first-contact study identified 254 first onsets, corresponding to a treated IR of 21 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 18–23). Two-thirds of the difference was accounted for by subjects treated for other disorders before the onset of psychosis, and by patients in older age groups.

Conclusions.

The incidence of schizophrenia was three times higher in a longitudinal register study than in a high-quality first-contact study conducted in the same population. Risk estimates based only on first-contact studies may have been affected by selection bias.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amminger, GP, Harris, MG, Conus, P, Lambert, M, Elkins, KS, Yuen, HP, McGorry, PD (2006). Treated incidence of first-episode psychosis in the catchment area of EPPIC between 1997 and 2000. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 114, 337345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, KK (2013). Health service registry data in psychiatric epidemiology: challenges for definition and interpretation. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 127, 910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, KK, Fuhrer, R, Malla, A (2010). The pathways to mental health care of first-episode psychosis patients: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine 40, 15851597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, NC, Flaum, M, Arndt, S (1992). The Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH). An instrument for assessing diagnosis and psychopathology. Archives of General Psychiatry 49, 615623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayuso-Mateos, JL (2012). Global Burden of Schizophrenia in the Year 2000: Version 1 Estimates . (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/bod_schizophrenia.pdf). Accessed 24 March 2014.Google Scholar
Bourque, F, van der Ven, E, Malla, A (2010). A meta-analysis of the risk for psychotic disorders among first- and second-generation immigrants. Psychological Medicine 41, 897910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, I, Waraich, P, Jones, W, Slater, S, Goldner, EM, Somers, J (2006). Increase in schizophrenia incidence rates: findings in a Canadian cohort born 1975–1985. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 41, 611618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, MA, Brown, AS, Schaefer, CA, Begg, MD, Wyatt, RJ, Susser, E (2005). Incidence and cumulative risk of treated schizophrenia in the prenatal determinants of schizophrenia study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 26, 297308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromet, EJ, Kotov, R, Fochtmann, LJ, Carlson, GA, Tanenberg-Karant, M, Ruggero, C, Chang, S-W (2011). Diagnostic shifts during the decade following first admission for psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry 168, 11861194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugha, TS (2004). Trends in service use and treatment for mental disorders in adults throughout Great Britain. British Journal of Psychiatry 185, 378384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadenhead, KS, Addington, J, Cannon, TD, Cornblatt, B, McGlashan, T, Perkins, D, Seidman, L, Tsuang, M, Walker, E, Woods, S, Heinssen, R (2010). Treatment history in the psychosis prodrome: characteristics of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study Cohort. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 4, 220226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, F, Kirkbride, JB, Lennox, BR, Perez, J, Masson, K, Lawrence, K, Hill, K, Feeley, L, Painter, M, Murray, GK, Gallagher, O, Bullmore, ET, Jones, PB (2011). Administrative incidence of psychosis assessed in an early intervention service in England: first epidemiological evidence from a diverse, rural and urban setting. Psychological Medicine 41, 949958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, JE, Goodhead, D, Craig, T, Harris, M, Howat, J, Korer, J (1987). The incidence of schizophrenia in Nottingham. British Journal of Psychiatry 151, 619626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dealberto, M-J (2013). Are the rates of schizophrenia unusually high in Canada? A comparison of Canadian and international data. Psychiatry Research 209, 259265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galdos, PM, van Os, JJ, Murray, RM (1993). Puberty and the onset of psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 10, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häfner, H, Riecher-Rossler, A, Hambrecht, M, Maurer, K, Meissner, S, Schmidtke, A, Fätkenheuer, B, Löffler, W, van der Heiden, W (1992). IRAOS: an instrument for the assessment of onset and early course of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 6, 209223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafner, H, van der Heiden, W (1986). The contribution of European case registers to research on schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 12, 2651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isohanni, M, Jones, PB, Moilanen, K, Rantakallio, P, Veijola, J, Oja, H, Koiranen, M, Jokelainen, J, Croudace, T, Järvelin, M-R (2001). Early developmental milestones in adult schizophrenia and other psychoses. A 31-year follow-up of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort. Schizophrenia Research 52, 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablensky, AV, Sartorius, N, Ernberg, G, Anker, M, Korten, A, Cooper, JE, Day, R, Bertelsen, A (1992). Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health Organization ten-country study. Psychological Medicine. Monograph Supplement 20, 197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jörgensen, L, Ahlbom, A, Allebeck, P, Dalman, C (2010). The Stockholm Non-Affective Psychoses Study (SNAPS): the importance of including out-patient data in incidence studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 121, 389392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kale, R (1995). Traditional healers in South Africa: a parallel health care system. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 310, 11821185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, RC, Demler, O, Frank, RG, Olfson, M, Pincus, HA, Walters, EE, Wang, P, Wells, KB, Zaslavsky, AM (2005). Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. New England Journal of Medicine 352, 25152523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkbride, JB, Errazuriz, A, Croudace, TJ, Morgan, C, Jackson, D, Boydell, J, Murray, RM, Jones, PB (2012). Incidence of schizophrenia and other psychoses in England, 1950–2009: a systematic review and meta-analyses. PloS One 7, e31660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkbride, JB, Fearon, P, Morgan, C, Dazzan, P, Morgan, K, Tarrant, J, Lloyd, T, Holloway, J, Hutchinson, G, Leff, JP, Mallett, RM, Harrison, GL, Murray, RM, Jones, PB (2006). Heterogeneity in incidence rates of schizophrenia and other psychotic syndromes: findings from the 3-center AeSOP study. Archives of General Psychiatry 63, 250258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kodesh, A, Goldshtein, I, Gelkopf, M, Goren, I, Chodick, G, Shalev, V (2012). Epidemiology and comorbidity of severe mental illnesses in the community: findings from a computerized mental health registry in a large Israeli health organization. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 47, 17751782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J, Saha, S, Welham, J, El Saadi, O, MacCauley, C, Chant, D (2004). A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: the distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology. BMC Medicine 2, 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, RM, Jones, PB, Susser, E, van Os, J, Cannon, M (2002). The Epidemiology of Schizophrenia. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietdijk, J, Hogerzeil, SJ, van Hemert, AM, Cuijpers, P, Linszen, DH, van der Gaag, M (2011). Pathways to psychosis: help-seeking behavior in the prodromal phase. Schizophrenia Research 132, 213219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothman, KJ, Lash, TL, Greenland, S (2012). Modern Epidemiology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, London, Buenos Aires, Hong Kong, Sydney, Tokyo: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Salokangas, RKR, Helminen, M, Koivisto, A-M, Rantanen, H, Oja, H, Pirkola, S, Wahlbeck, K, Joukamaa, M (2011). Incidence of hospitalised schizophrenia in Finland since 1980: decreasing and increasing again. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 46, 343350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, HJ, Mortensen, EL, Schiffman, J, Reinisch, JM, Maeda, J, Mednick, SA (2010). Early developmental milestones and risk of schizophrenia: a 45-year follow-up of the Copenhagen Perinatal Cohort. Schizophrenia Research 118, 4147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutterland, AL, Dieleman, J, Storosum, JG, Voordouw, BA, Kroon, J, Veldhuis, J, Denys, DA, de Haan, L, Sturkenboom, MC (2013). Annual incidence rate of schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders in a longitudinal population-based cohort study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 48, 13571365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorup, A, Waltoft, BL, Pedersen, CB, Mortensen, EL, Nordentoft, M (2007). Young males have a higher risk of developing schizophrenia: a Danish register study. Psychological Medicine 37, 479484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanasse, A, Courteau, J, Fleury, M-J, Grégoire, J-P, Lesage, A, Moisan, J (2012). Treatment prevalence and incidence of schizophrenia in Quebec using a population health services perspective: different algorithms, different estimates. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 47, 533543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Werf, M, Hanssen, M, Köhler, S, Verkaaik, M, Verhey, FR; RISE Investigators, van Winkel, R, van Os, J, Allardyce, J (2014). Systematic review and collaborative recalculation of 133,693 incident cases of schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 44, 916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Os, J, Howard, R, Takei, N, Murray, RM (1995). Increasing age is a risk factor for psychosis in the elderly. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 30, 161164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veen, ND (2004). Diagnostic stability in a Dutch psychosis incidence cohort. British Journal of Psychiatry 185, 460464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veling, W, Selten, J-P, Susser, E, Laan, W, Mackenbach, JP, Hoek, HW (2007). Discrimination and the incidence of psychotic disorders among ethnic minorities in The Netherlands. International Journal of Epidemiology 36, 761768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahlbeck, K, Forsén, T, Osmond, C, Barker, DJ, Eriksson, JG (2001). Association of schizophrenia with low maternal body mass index, small size at birth, and thinness during childhood. Archives of General Psychiatry 58, 4852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, JK, Babor, T, Brugha, T, Burke, J, Cooper, JE, Giel, R, Jablensky, A, Regier, D, Sartorius, N (1990). SCAN. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry 47, 589593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Direct comparison of first-contact versus longitudinal register-based case finding in the same population: early evidence that the incidence of schizophrenia may be three times higher than commonly reported
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Direct comparison of first-contact versus longitudinal register-based case finding in the same population: early evidence that the incidence of schizophrenia may be three times higher than commonly reported
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Direct comparison of first-contact versus longitudinal register-based case finding in the same population: early evidence that the incidence of schizophrenia may be three times higher than commonly reported
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *