Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:00:06.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioural measurement and drug response characteristics of unipolar and bipolar depression1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Eli Robins
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jack Croughan
Affiliation:
1050 Baltimore Pike, Springfield, Pennsylvania, USA.
Steven Secunda
Affiliation:
1050 Baltimore Pike, Springfield, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alan Swann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Synopsis

This research is part of the NIMH-CRB Collaborative Study on the psychobiology of depression. The main objective of the research programme is to test hypotheses concerning the interaction of neurobiological mechanisms and behaviour in the depressive disorders. Part I of the report describes the rationale and the overall approach to measuring behavioural state and outcome in the research programme. Part II reports on the results of applying the behavioural methods to a comparison of the clinical phenomenology of unipolar and bipolar depression. The behavioural patterns expressed during the episode by the two groups are different. Further, the two types are shown to react differently to treatment with tricyclic drugs, reinforcing the thesis that they are qualitatively distinct forms of the depressive disorders.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Based on a paper presented at the meeting of the International Collegium of Neuropsychopharmacology, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 1980.

References

REFERENCES

Beck, A. T. (1972). Depression: Causes and Treatment. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Beigel, A. & Murphy, D. L. (1971). Unipolar and biopolar affective illness. Archives of General Psychiatry 24, 215220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ching, J., Katz, M. M. & Sanborn, K. O. (1975). C-K-S Video Interview Rating Scale. Institute of Behavioral Sciences: Honolulu. (Unpublished manuscript.)Google Scholar
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H. & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A measure of primary symptom dimensions. In Psychological Measurements in Psychopharmacology: Modern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry. Vol. 7 (ed. Pichot, P.), pp. 79110. S. Karger: Basle.Google Scholar
Ebel, R. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika 16, 407424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuerster, C. (1974). Behavioral approaches to depression. In The Psychology of Depression: Contemporary Theory and Research (ed. Friedman, R. J. and Katz, M. M.), pp. 2953. Winston-Wiley: Washington.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, S. W. & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile date. Psychometrika 24, 95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1967). Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 6, 278296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Katz, M. M. & Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (1978). Phenomenology and classification of depression. In Psychopharmacology: A Generation of Progress (ed. Lipton, M. A., DiMascio, A. and Killam, K. F.), pp. 11851196. Raven Press: New York.Google Scholar
Katz, M. M. & Itil, T. M. (1974). Video methodology for research in psychopathology and psychopharmacology. Archives of General Psychiatry 31, 204210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, M. M., Secunda, S. K., Hirschfeld, R. M. A. & Koslow, S. H. (1979). NIMH-Clinical Research Branch Collaborative Program on the Psychobiology of Depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 36, 765771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, H. E. (1972). Tests of psychomotility relevant to the affective disorders. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. (Unpublished manuscript.)Google Scholar
Leonhard, K., Korff, I. & Schulz, H. (1962). Temperaments in the families of monopolar and bipolar phasic psychoses. Psychiatria et Neurologia 143, 416434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maas, J. W., Koslow, S. H., Davis, J., Katz, M. M., Mendels, J., Robins, E., Stokes, P. & Bowden, C. (1980). Biological component of the NIMH Clinical Research Branch Collaborative Program on the psychobiology of depression: I. Background and theoretical considerations. Psychological Medicine 10, 759776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, D. L., Pickar, D. & Alterman, I. S. (1982). Methods for the quantitative assessment of depressive and manic behavior. In Quantitative Techniques for the Evaluation of the Behavior of Psychiatric Patients (ed. Burdock, E. I., Sudilovsky, A. and Gershon, S.). Marcel-Dekker: New York.Google Scholar
Perris, C. (1976). Frequency and hereditary aspects of depression. In Depression: Behavioral, Biochemical and Treatment Concepts (ed. Gallent, P. M. and Simpson, G. M.), pp. 75107. Spectrum: New York.Google Scholar
Raskin, A., Schulterbrandt, J. G., Reatig, N. & McKeon, J. J. (1969). Replication of factors of psychopathology in interview, ward behavior, and self-ratings of hospitalized depressives. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 148, 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secunda, S., Koslow, S. H., Redmond, D. E., Garver, D., Ramsey, T. A., Croughan, J., Kocsis, J., Hanin, I. & Lieberman, K. (1980). Biological component of the NIMH Clinical Research Branch Collaborative Program on the psychobiology of depression: II. Methodology and data analysis. Psychological Medicine 10, 777793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1978). Research Diagnostic Criteria. Archives of General Psychiatry 35, 773782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winokur, G., Clayton, P. & Reich, T. (1969). Manic-Depressive Illness. C. V. Mosby: St Louis.Google Scholar