Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

A meta-analysis of randomized trials of behavioural treatment of depression

  • D. Ekers (a1), D. Richards (a2) and S. Gilbody (a2)

Depression is a common, disabling condition for which psychological treatments, in particular cognitive behavioural therapies are recommended. Promising results in recent randomized trials have renewed interest in behavioural therapy. This systematic review sought to identify all randomized trials of behavioural therapy for depression, determine the effect of such interventions and examine any moderators of such effect.


Randomized trials of behavioural treatments of depression versus controls or other psychotherapies were identified using electronic database searches, previous reviews and reference lists. Data on symptom-level, recovery/dropout rate and study-level moderators (study quality, number of sessions, severity and level of training) were extracted and analysed using meta-analysis and meta-regression respectively.


Seventeen randomized controlled trials including 1109 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. A random-effects meta-analysis of symptom-level post-treatment showed behavioural therapies were superior to controls [standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.70, 95% CI −1.00 to −0.39, k=12, n=459], brief psychotherapy (SMD −0.56, 95% CI −1.0 to −0.12, k=3, n=166), supportive therapy (SMD −0.75, 95% CI −1.37 to −0.14, k=2, n=45) and equal to cognitive behavioural therapy (SMD 0.08, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.30, k=12, n=476).


The results in this study indicate behavioural therapy is an effective treatment for depression with outcomes equal to that of the current recommended psychological intervention. Future research needs to address issues of parsimony of such interventions.

Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: D. Ekers, Tees Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Trust/Department of Health Sciences, The Health Centre, Newcastle Road, Chester le Street, Co. Durham DH3 3UR, UK. (Email:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A Beck , C Ward , M Mendelson , J Mock , J Erdbaugh (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 4, 561571.

S Dimidjian , S Hollon , K Dobson , K Schmaling , R Kohlenberg , M Addis , R Gallop , J McGlinchey , D Markley , J Gollan , D Atkins , D Dunner , N Jacobson (2006). Randomized trial of behavioural activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 74, 658670.

K Dobson (1989). A meta analysis of the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57, 414419.

C Ferster (1973). A functional analysis of depression. American Psychologist 28, 857870.

T Furukawa , C Barbui , A Cipriani , P Brambilla , N Watanabe (2006). Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59, 710.

D Gallagher , L Thompson (1982). Treatment of major depressive disorder in older adult outpatients with brief psychotherapies. Psychotherapy 19, 482490.

V Gloaguen , J Cottraux , M Cucherat , I Blackburn (1998). A meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients. Journal of Affective Disorders 49, 5972.

M Hamilton (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 23, 5662.

J Higgins , S Thompson , J Deeks , D Altman (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal 327, 557560.

D Hopko , C Lejuez , K Ruggiaro , G Eifert (2003 b). Contemporary behavioural activation treatments for depression: procedures, principles and progress. Clinical Psychology Review 23, 699717.

N Jacobson , E Gortner (2000). Can depression be de-medicalised in the 21st century: scientific revolutions, counter revolutions and the magnetic field of normal science. Behaviour Research and Therapy 38, 103117.

A Jadad , R Moore , D Carroll , C Jenkinson , D Reynolds , D Cavaghan , H McQuay (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials 17, 112.

P Lewinsohn , M Graf (1973). Pleasant activities and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 41, 261295.

M Lipsey , D Wilson (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational and behavioural treatment. American Psychologist 48, 11811209.

K McNamara , J Horan (1986). Experimental construct validity in the evaluation of cognitive and behavioral treatments for depression. Journal of Counselling Psychology 33, 2330.

K Schulz , D Grimes (2002). Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet 359, 614618.

F Scogin , C Jamison , K Gochneaur (1989). Comparative efficacy of cognitive and behavioral bibliotherapy for mildly and moderately depressed older adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57, 403407.

F Taylor , W Marshall (1977). Experimental analysis of a cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1, 5972.

L Thompson , D Gallagher , J Breckenridge (1987). Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies for depressed elders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55, 385390.

S Thompson , J Higgins (2002). How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Statistics in Medicine 21, 15591573.

P Wilson (1982). Combined pharmacological and behavioural treatment of depression. Behavior Research and Therapy 20, 173184.

P Wilson , J Goldin , P Charbonneau (1983). Comparative efficacy of behavioral and cognitive treatments of depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research 7, 111124.

A Zeiss , P Lewinsohn , R Munoz (1979). Nonspecific improvement effects in depression using interpersonal skills training, pleasant activity schedules or cognitive training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47, 427439.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Psychological Medicine
  • ISSN: 0033-2917
  • EISSN: 1469-8978
  • URL: /core/journals/psychological-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Ekers Supplementary Material

 Word (28 KB)
28 KB
Supplementary Materials

Ekers Supplementary Material

 Word (90 KB)
90 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 38
Total number of PDF views: 216 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1169 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.