Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:59:33.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recurrent brief depression – more investigations in clinical samples are now required

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2003

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Classifications of depression based on secondary care samples may have little relevance in primary care settings, where many patients do not fulfil criteria for major depression; for example, through having depressive symptoms that are either too mild or too brief. And yet many such patients receive antidepressant treatments (antidepressants and various psychotherapies). At a time when the appropriate recognition and treatment of people with depressive symptoms is the subject of much discussion, and there is concern about the burgeoning number of new psychiatric diagnoses, the burden and hazards of depressive disorders need to be emphasized. The paper by Pezawas et al. (2003) (in this issue) reports the findings of an epidemiological study in adolescents and young adults, and provides a detailed description of the prevalence and features of one such disruptive disorder, namely recurrent brief depression.

Type
Editorial
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press