Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-h5th4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-11T05:42:50.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2020

Yusuke Kimata
Affiliation:
Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules (ITbM), Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan
Takumi Higaki
Affiliation:
International Research Organization for Advanced Science and Technology (IROAST), Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
Daisuke Kurihara
Affiliation:
Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules (ITbM), Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan JST, PRESTO, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan
Naoe Ando
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
Hikari Matsumoto
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
Tetsuya Higashiyama
Affiliation:
Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules (ITbM), Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Minako Ueda*
Affiliation:
Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules (ITbM), Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: M. Ueda, Tel.: +81 22-795-6713; E-mail: minako.ueda.e7@tohoku.ac.jp

Abstract

The zygote is the first cell of a multicellular organism. In most angiosperms, the zygote divides asymmetrically to produce an embryo-precursor apical cell and a supporting basal cell. Zygotic division should properly segregate symbiotic organelles, because they cannot be synthesized de novo. In this study, we revealed the real-time dynamics of the principle source of ATP biogenesis, mitochondria, in Arabidopsis thaliana zygotes using live-cell observations and image quantifications. In the zygote, the mitochondria formed the extended structure associated with the longitudinal array of actin filaments (F-actins) and were polarly distributed along the apical–basal axis. The mitochondria were then temporally fragmented during zygotic division, and the resulting apical cells inherited mitochondria at higher concentration compared to the basal cells. Further observation of postembryonic organs showed that these mitochondrial behaviours are characteristic of the zygote. Overall, our results showed that the zygote has spatiotemporal regulation that unequally distributes the mitochondria.

Information

Type
Original Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in anymedium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The John Innes Centre
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Live-cell imaging and quantification of zygotic mitochondria. (a and b) Two-photon excitation microscopy (2PEM) images of the egg cell (a) and the time-lapse observation of the zygote in the in vitro-cultivated ovules (b) expressing the mitochondrial/nuclear marker. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images are shown. Images are representative of nine time-lapse observations. Numbers indicate the time (h:min) from when the zygote started elongation. Yellow arrowheads indicate the nuclei, and the inset shows an enlarged image of the basal cell region. (c) Illustrations showing a summary of the respective stages. (d–f) Image processing for quantification analysis. (d) MIP image generated by serial optical sections of 2PEM images of a mature zygote expressing the mitochondrial/nuclear marker. (e) Mask image of the cell area. (f) Binary image of the mitochondria. (g–i) Graphs of the cell area (g), the total mitochondrial area (h) and the mitochondrial occupancy (i) in the young and mature zygotes. Right illustrations show the correlation between the values and the features of cells and/or mitochondria. Significant difference was determined by Mann–Whitney U test; *p < .05; **p < .01 [n = 8 (young) and 10 (mature)]. Scale bars: 10 and 1 μm (insets).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Formation of the filamentous mitochondria and its dependence on F-actin cables. (a–c) Image processing for quantification analysis. (a) Mask image of the cell area, shown as in Figure 1e. (b) Cell medial axis image. The yellow dot shows the midpoint of the axis. (c) The centre region, defined as a circle with a radius of 15.6 μm (200 pixels), merged with Figure 1d. (d) Graph of ∆θ (the average angle of the mitochondria) against the cell longitudinal axis, which was measured in centre regions (c) of the mature and young zygotes. Note that the entire cell area in all tested young zygotes was included in the circle. (e) Two-photon excitation microscopy (2PEM) images of the mature zygote expressing the F-actin/mitochondrial marker. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images are shown, and insets show the enlarged images of the basal cell region. (f) 2PEM images of the mitochondrial/nuclear marker after the exposure to the control dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the polymerization inhibitor of F-actin (1 μM LatB) for 4 h. (g) Graph of the circularity, which was measured using the mitochondria on the single focal plane of entire cell regions of the DMSO- and LatB-treated zygotes. The right illustrations show the correlation between the mitochondrial shape and value. (h) 2PEM images of the mitochondrial/DRP3A marker. The midplane images are shown, and insets show enlarged images of the basal cell region. Significant differences were determined by Mann–Whitney U test (d) and Student’s t test (g); **p < .01 [n = 8 (young) and 10 (mature) in d, and n = 13 (DMSO) and 17 (LatB) in g]. Scale bars: 10 and 1 μm (insets).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Temporary mitochondrial fragmentation during zygotic division. (a) Two-photon excitation microscopy (2PEM) images of the time-lapse observation of the mitochondrial/nuclear marker. Images are representative of eight time-lapse observations. Numbers indicate the time (h:min) from when the observation began, and the inset shows an enlarged image of the basal region. Upper panels show maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, and lower panels display the enlarged images of the nuclear region at the midplane. The yellow and cyan arrowheads point to the dividing nucleus and the cell boundary between the apical and basal cells, respectively. The corresponding stages are indicated, and the dotted line shows the stage when the nuclear division was completed, but the cell boundary was still unclear. (b and c) Graphs of the ratio of max/min of Feret’s diameter (b) and circularity (c), which were measured using the mitochondria in the cell centre regions. From the time-lapse images, the time frames before, during, and after the zygotic division were used as mature, dividing and one-cell embryo, respectively. (d) Graph of the total mitochondrial area, measured using the whole-cell areas like in Figure 1h. The left illustration of b shows a schematic representation of the Feret’s diameter, and the right illustrations show the correlation between the mitochondrial features and respective values. (e) 2PEM image of the time-lapse observation of the mitochondrial/nuclear marker in the presence of polymerization inhibitor for microtubules (1 μM oryzalin). Images are representative of five time-lapse observations. MIP images and enlarged images of the midplane are shown as similar to a. Orange arrowheads indicate the nucleus, which condensed but failed to completely divide. The letters on the graph indicate significant differences determined by the Tukey–Kramer test; p < .05 (b); p < 0.01 (c); not significant (d) (n = 10 for each stage). Scale bars: 10 and 1 μm (insets).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Polar distribution and unequal inheritance of mitochondria along the apical–basal axis. (a–c) Graphs of the mitochondrial distribution along the apical-basal axis in the young zygotes (a), mature zygotes (b) and one-cell embryos (c). The images used for Figure 1g–i and the time-lapse images used for Figure 3b–d were used here to measure the mitochondrial green fluorescent protein (GFP) intensity. As shown in the left illustration of each graph, the apical–basal axis was determined using the bounding box (dotted square), and the apical cell tip and the basal bottom were set as the position 100 and 0, respectively. The GFP intensity shows the sum of the signals at each horizontal plane along the apical–basal axis. The right box plot of c shows the positions of cell boundaries of the apical and basal cells. (d) Schematic representation of the dynamics of the F-actin and mitochondria in zygote polarization and its asymmetric cell division. Grey bands represented as standard deviation (SD) [n = 8 (young) and 10 (mature and one-cell)].

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Mitochondrial morphology and distribution in postembryonic organs. (a–i) Two-photon excitation microscopy (2PEM) images of propidium iodide (PI)-stained root hair (a and b), root epidermis (c–e), leaf trichome (f–h), and root meristematic cells (i) in 7-day-old (a–e, and i) or 10-day-old (f–h) seedlings expressing the mitochondrial/nuclear marker. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) (a, d, f, and g) and midplane (b, c, e, h, and i) images are shown. Insets in a and b show the enlarged images of the dotted square areas. The enlarged images of the dotted square areas in c and f are shown in d and e, and g and h, respectively. Yellow and cyan rectangles in i indicate the dividing and non-dividing cell, respectively. (j–m) Graphs of the circularity (j and l) and the ratio of max/(max+min) of Feret’s diameter (k and m), which were measured using the mitochondria in a focal plane of the indicated cells. The cell types were indicated. The samples of the root meristem and the zygote in j and k correspond to those of non-dividing in l and m, and the zygote (DMSO) in Figure 2g, respectively. (n) 2PEM image of PI-stained stomatal precursor cells in 7-day-old seedlings expressing the mitochondrial/nuclear marker. MIP image was shown. Solid and dotted rectangles in N indicate the meristemoid and stomatal lineage ground cell (SLGC), respectively. (o–q) Graphs of the occupancy (o), circularity (p), and the ratio of max/(max+min) of Feret’s diameter (q) of the mitochondria in the meristemoid and SLGC. Significant differences from the values of the zygotes, and non-dividing cells were determined by Dunnett's test (j and k); **p < .01; ns, not significant [n = 13 (zygote), 12 (root hair), 13 (root epidermis), 25 (trichome) and 20 (root meristem)]. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t test (l, m, and o–q); **p < .01; ns, not significant [n = 20 (non-dividing) and 17 (dividing) in l and m, and n = 12 in each cell type in o–q]. Scale bars: 10 and 1 μm (insets).

Kimata et al. supplementary material

Kimata et al. supplementary material 1

Download Kimata et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 531.4 KB

Kimata et al. supplementary material

Kimata et al. supplementary material 2

Download Kimata et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 865.6 KB

Kimata et al. supplementary material

Kimata et al. supplementary material 3

Download Kimata et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 573.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kimata et al. supplementary material

Kimata et al. supplementary material 4

Download Kimata et al. supplementary material(File)
File 25.1 KB

Author comment: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R0/PR1

Comments

June 30th, 2020

Olivier Hamant

Editor-in-Chief

Quantitative Plant Biology

Dear Editor:

I wish to submit an original research article for publication in Quantitative Plant Biology, titled “Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes.” The paper was coauthored by Yusuke Kimata, Takumi Higaki, Daisuke Kurihara, Naoe Ando, Hikari Matsumoto, and Tetsuya Higashiyama.

This study reveals the dynamics of how the plant zygote segregates its mitochondria into the two daughter cells—the apical and basal cells—and shows that mitochondria are distributed unequally. Mitochondria in the zygote formed an extended structure associated with the longitudinal array of actin filaments (F-actins) and were polarly distributed along the apical-basal axis. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because the mitochondria are the main organelles that provide the cell with energy, and therefore our finding that the mitochondria are differently inherited in the first two daughter cells has large implications for plant ontogeny.

Further, we believe that this paper will be of interest to the readership of your journal because we show various kinds of methods to quantify the real-time dynamics of the mitochondria in the zygote, and their unequal distribution during the cell division. This is a promising approach, and can be used in future studies utilising image quantification.

This manuscript has not been published or presented elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal. We have read and understood your journal’s policies, and we believe that neither the manuscript nor the study violates any of these. Details about competing interests are provided separately.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Minako Ueda

Ph.D., Professor

Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan

Tel: +81-22-795-6713

E-mail: minako.ueda.e7@tohoku.ac.jp

Review: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to Author: Making use of a pioneering set-up for live imaging of Arabidopsis embryos, the Ueda lab has made seminal contributions to our understanding of the cell biology underpinning the directed expansion and asymmetric division of plant zygotes. Previous work has investigated the role of actin filaments and microtubules in these processes and described the dynamics of the vacuolar compartment in detail. Here, Kimata and colleagues report on the dynamic organization of mitochondria. In elongating zygotes, mitochondria were found to form an actin-associated filamentous network that is fragmented prior to the first division; mitochondria were concentrated in the apical portion of mature zygotes, such that the apical daughter cell inherited a denser population. Several parameters, such as the total volume occupied by mitochondria, their average shape (circularity, Feret’s diameter), their association with actin filaments, and their spatial orientation with respect to the cellular axis, were quantified for the pertinent developmental stages. The work has been done with much attention to detail and is documented in excellent pictures/movies. Overall, I enjoyed reading the manuscript, finding it compelling and informative.

Specific comments/suggestions:

Line 33/34, “as new organelles cannot be synthesized”: This sounds awkward – new organelles are generated all the time (although it is true that plastids and mitochondria have to be inherited and cannot be synthesized de novo).

Line 34/35, “principal energy source organelles”: principle source of ATP biogenesis?

Line 40 and all over the manuscript, “more concentrated mitochondria”: The wording makes it sound like “concentration” is a property of the mitochondria. What seems to be happening is that the mitochondria are packed more densly in the apical part of the zygote (probably due to the presence of a central vacuole in the basal part of the zygote) and that the concentration of mitochondria (with respect to total cell volume, that is including the volume of the vacuole) is higher in the apical than the basal cell.

Line 53: This is a very strong statement – is the apical/basal axis really “defined” by the division of the zygote?

Line 63: Presumably the function of mitochondria is essential at all stages of the life cycle?

Line 66: Energy consumption does not necessarily mirror the rate of proliferation.

Line 96/70: The distribution of mitochondria with the first division has been documented before; for example, Manfield & Briarty (1991, cited in the manuscript) measured the distribution of plastids and mitochondria on the basis of electron micrographs and Yamaoka & al. (2011, also cited in the manuscript) measured the fluorescence associated with mitochondria in wild type and miro mutant zygotes and early embryos.

Line 77, “pre-existing mitochondrial pattern”: distribution pattern?

Line 79, “extended filamentous shape”: filamentous network?

Line 82, “these mitochondrial features”: similar features?

Lines 134 and 145: Not sure what “disorganized” is describing here – random distribution?

Lines 134/135 and 152/153: The title mentions “mitochondrial volume”, but later “cell region” and “total mitochondrial area” are used – this should be clarified.

Line 189/190: I am not familiar with the ZYGOTE-ARREST1 mutant and the Guo paper is not the references. Isn’t the APC/C a multi-protein complex? What does the gene encode?

Line 192, “contribute to the zygote”: contribute to zygote development?

Line 242-244: Similar to the nucleus displacing mitochondria in the center of elongating zygotes, it seems to me like this polar distribution arises because the large vacuole displaces mitochondria at the base of mature zygotes. This seems like a very simple mechanism for explaining the observed results (maybe the concentration of mitochondria is actually relatively constant with respect to the cytoplasm). Could the authors comment on this possibility either here or in the discussion?

Line 303, “are formed”: may be formed?

Line 338, “major energy source”: major source of ATP?

Line 354-363: Could miro mutants shed light on the question whether or not unequal distribution of mitochondria is important for further development? According to Yasmaoka & al., miro has no impact on polarized zygotic elongation or subsequent asymmetric zygotic division, but mutant apical cells have fewer mitochondria – do they still develop normally?

Figure 1, D,E,F: How were the threshold-values for “digitizing” determined? What is the influence of different threshold values on the measurements (how robust are the measurements)?

Figure 2, G: How was circularity calculated?

Figure 3, “Temporal fragmentation” – temporary fragmentation?

Figure 3, B and Figure 5, K: A ratio of “Max” to the sum of “Max” and “Min” would be a more straightforward measure (less prone to hyperbole).

Figure 3, C: mature is 0.7, vs. 0,8 in Figure 2 – what is the difference? Also, LatB treatment increases circularity to ~0.85, whereas in dividing zygotes it is <0.8 – so, less round?

Figure 3 E: From which area were the insets in the “MIP” row taken? What were the criteria for choosing these areas?

Figure 4: The Figurenicely summarizes the results!

Review: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to Author: In the current manuscript Ueda and co-workers have investigated the dynamics and morphology of mitochondria during the first division in the Arabidopsis zygote. The manuscript is well written and the experiments have been performed up to the highest standards. I appreciate their efforts to quantify the shape of the mitochondria in the zygote and how this changes during its asymmetric division. Since the authors have the biological material, have they performed time-lapse imaging looking at the zygote division in the lifeAct/mitoGFP double maker line? It would be nice to show what happens to the intensity of the actin marker compared to the intensity of the mitoGFP marker during the asymmetric division. Do the authors think that asymmetric divisions always could lead to an unequal division of the mitochondria or is this specific for the zygote. I appreciate that the authors have looked at the mitoGFP in different cells and tissues, but they did not provide any data of asymmetric divisions in other cell types such as stomata or in the XPP during lateral root initiation. It might be good to look at this to make the point whether the observed dynamics are specific for the zygote or rather linked to asymmetric divisions.

Recommendation: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R0/PR4

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Dr Ueda and colleagues,

We have now received the comments from two expert reviewers on your manuscript. Please find their detailed comments attached.

Both reviewers agreed on the interest and high quality of the work.

They ask however for minor modifications prior acceptance to publication.

As you will see, Reviewer 1 suggests a number of minor changes that could be addressed by rephrasing/modulating, in the results and the discussion text. Also, he asks to improve quantitative analysis of the data for several points. Notably improving shape quantification by normalizing better Feret’s diameters, which I think it is an important point to ensure no size effects for this shape quantifier.

I think his different points could be addressed and/or discussed, and would improve the manuscript.

Reviewer 2 is wondering if you have performed time-lapse imaging during the asymmetric division of the zygote for the life-act/mtGFP marker, to see their relative intensity. If you have the data, it could be nice to add such quantifications.

He is also proposing to look at post-embryonic cell types presenting asymmetric cell divisions (ACD). Do stomata mother cells and/or lateral root founder cells display filamenteous/non spherical mitochondria before ACD as in the zygote? This would reinforce your conclusions on the specificity of mitochondria organisation in the zygote, or conversely, suggest a conserved mechanism for asymmetric divisions. This would broaden the biological significance of the results. The question should be possible to address in static imaging using the RPS5a::mtGFP marker reported here.

However, please let us know if you see any technical issue to achieve this, that would over-delay resubmission of more than 2-3 months.

In addition, I would like to thank the authors for the detailed Supplementary Materials file. However, in the imaging section, I’ve noticed that the wavelengths filters for emission detection used for the different fluorescent markers are missing, which could be important for the reader to reproduce experiments.

We would be happy to receive a corrected version of your manuscript when it is ready.

I thank you again for having submitted your excellent manuscript to Quantitative Plant Biology.

Sincerely

Daphné

Decision: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R1/PR6

Comments

Olivier Hamant

Editor-in-Chief

Daphné Autran

Associate Editor

Quantitative Plant Biology

September 3rd, 2020

Dear Olivier and Daphné,

We really appreciate for the positive comments and suggestions of the reviewers on our submitted manuscript. We think we have solved the issues inquired by reviewers. By adding new data and revising the phrases, we now have much accurate descriptions, as detailed in the responses to reviewers’ comments. We have also added the information for the wavelengths filters for emission detection used for the different fluorescent markers, which were pointed by Daphné. In addition, according to the instruction from Ms. Rebecca Fitchett, we have replaced the image for thumbnail, and integrated our Supplementary Materials and thus Supplementary References into the main text. The corrected parts in the revised manuscript are shown as track changes.

Thank you really so much for your great efforts. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon!

Yours sincerely,

Minako Ueda

Our original manuscript title was "Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes".

Tracking #: QPB-20-0007

Authors: Kimata et al.

Minako Ueda

Ph.D., Professor

Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan

Tel: +81-22-795-6713

E-mail: minako.ueda.e7@tohoku.ac.jp

Review: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R1/PR7

Comments

Comments to Author: The revised version comes with an expanded, more detailed methods section, and many small changes have been made throughout the text to improve clarity. This looks very nice, compliments to the authors.

Review: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R1/PR8

Comments

Comments to Author: The authors have addressed all my comments.

Recommendation: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R1/PR9

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Minako,

I would like to thank you very much for the detailed revision of your manuscript, addressing nicely all the comments. We recommend its publication in QPB.

Best wishes

Daphné

Decision: Mitochondrial dynamics and segregation during the asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.