Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T06:15:45.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass Spectrometric Studies of Carbon 13 Variations in Corn and Other Grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Margaret M. Bender
Margaret M. Bender*
Affiliation:
Department of Meteorology, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Our experience in radiocarbon dating has shown that dates obtained from samples of corn cob and kernels are usually too young compared with dates from wood samples. Since other laboratories have also commented on the same problem, a study of C13/C12 ratios in corn and other plant materials has been undertaken.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , 1968 , pp. 468 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Boettcher, Robert J., 1966, Mass spectrometric analysis of isotopic fractionation effects involved in radiocarbon dating: Senior thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Craig, Harmon, 1953, The geochemistry of the stable carbon isotopes: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, v. 3, p. 53–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Harmon 1954, Carbon 13 in plants and the relationships between carbon 13 and carbon 14 variations in nature: Jour. Geology, v. 62, no. 2, p. 115–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sharkawy, M. and Hesketh, J. D., 1965, Photosynthesis among species in relation to characteristics of leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion resistances: Crop Science, v. 5, p. 517–521.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert L., 1967a, Those late corn dates: isotopic fractionation as a source of error in carbon-14 dates: Michigan Archaeologist, v. 13, no. 3, in press.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert L. 1967b, More about corn, Cahokia, and carbon-14: Report circulated at Cahokia Field Conference, August, 1967.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. D., Slack, C. R., and Johnson, H. S., 1967, Further studies on a new pathway of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation in sugar-cane and its occurrence in other plant species: Biochem. Jour., v. 102, p. 417–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kortschak, H. P., Hartt, C. E., and Burr, G. O., 1965, Carbon dioxide fixation in sugar cane leaves: Plant Physiology, v. 40 (2), p. 209–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prat, H., 1960, Toward a natural classification of Gramineae: Soc. Bot. France Bull., v. 107, p. 32–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafter, T. A., 1955, 14C variations in nature and the effect on radiocarbon dating: New Zealand Jour. Sci. and Tech., sec. B, v. 37, p. 20–38.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. S., 1956, Cytogenetics and evolution of the grass family: Am. Jour. Botany, v. 43, 890–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Deevey, E. S., 1962, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements VII: Radiocarbon, v. 4, p. 250–262.Google Scholar
Tauber, Henrik, 1967, Copenhagen radiocarbon measurements VIII: Radiocarbon, v. 9, p. 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickman, F. E., 1952, Variations in the relative abundance of the carbon isotopes in plants: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta., v. 2, p. 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar