Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984

  • S G E Bowman (a1), J C Ambers (a1) and M N Leese (a1)
Abstract

Dates issued by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory between 1980 and 1984 are known to have been in error. This paper outlines the cause of the problem and the procedures adopted to revise the results affected. Where revision has been possible, on average this has given dates older by 200 to 300 radiocarbon years. The individual revised results are tabulated.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Ambers, J 1987 Stable carbon isotope ratios and their relevance to the determination of accurate radiocarbon dates for lime mortars. Jour Archaeol Sci 14: 569576.
Ambers, J, Burleigh, R and Matthews, K 1987 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XIX. Radiocarbon 29 (1): 6177.
Ambers, J, Matthews, K and Bowman, S 1987 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XX. Radiocarbon 29 (2): 177196.
Ambers, J, Matthews, K and Burleigh, R 1985 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XVIII. Radiocarbon 27 (3): 508524.
Barrett, J, Bradley, R and Green, M, in press, Landscape, monuments and society - The prehistory of Cranborne Chase. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ Press.
Bowman, SGE and Ambers, JC, in press, Past and present: the identification of an error in, and the present status of, radiocarbon dating at the British Museum. In Mook, WG and Waterbolk, HT, eds, Internatl symposium, Archaeology and 14C, 2nd, Proc. PACT.
Burleigh, R, Ambers, J and Matthews, K 1982 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XV. Radiocarbon 24 (3): 262290.
Burleigh, R, Ambers, J and Matthews, K 1983 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XVI. Radiocarbon 25 (1): 3958.
Burleigh, R, Ambers, J and Matthews, K 1984 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XVII. Radiocarbon 26 (1): 5974.
Burleigh, R and Matthews, K 1982 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XIII. Radiocarbon 24 (2): 151170.
Burleigh, R, Matthews, K and Ambers, J 1982 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XIV. Radiocarbon 24 (3): 229261.
Burleigh, R, Matthews, K, Ambers, J and Kinnes, I 1981 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XII. Radiocarbon 23 (1): 1423.
International Study Group 1982 An inter-laboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree rings. Nature 298: 619623.
Leese, MN 1987 Method for finding calendar date bands from multiple-valued radiocarbon calibration curves, in Ruggles, CLN and Rahtz, SPQ, eds, Computer and quantitative methods in archaeology. Br Archaeol Repts, Internatl ser 393: 147151.
Otlet, RL and Slade, BS 1974 Harwell radiocarbon measurements I. Radiocarbon 16 (2): 178191.
Otlet, RL, Walker, AJ, Hewson, AD and Burleigh, R 1980 14C interlaboratory comparison in the UK: experiment design, preparation and preliminary results. In Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, Internatl 14C conf, 10th, Proc. Radiocarbon 22 (3): 936946.
Pearson, GW, Pilcher, JR, Baillie, MGL, Corbett, DM and Qua, F 1986 High-precision 14C measurements of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840–5210 BC. In Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc. Radiocarbon 28 (2B): 911934.
Scott, EM, Aitchison, TC, Harkness, DD, Baxter, MS and Cook, GT 1989 An interim progress report on stages 1 and 2 of the international collaborative program. In Long, A and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 13th, Proc. Radiocarbon 31 (3):414421.
Scott, EM, Baxter, MS, Harkness, DD, Aitchison, TC and Cook, GT, in press, Recent progress in the international comparison of radiocarbon laboratories. In Mook, WG and Waterbolk, HT, eds, Internatl symposium, Archaeology and 14C, 2nd, Proc. PACT.
Stuiver, M and Pearson, GW 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950–500 BC. In Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc. Radiocarbon 28 (2B): 805838.
Tite, MS, Bowman, SGE, Ambers, JC and Matthews, KJ 1987 Preliminary statement on an error in British Museum radiocarbon dates (BM-1700 to BM-2315). Antiquity 61 (232): 168.
Tite, MS, Bowman, SGE, Ambers, JC and Matthews, KJ 1988 Preliminary statement on an error in British Museum radiocarbon dates (BM-1700 to BM-2315). Radiocarbon 30(1): 132.
Waterbolk, HT and Lanting, JN, in press, Empirical evidence for quality differences between radiocarbon laboratories. In Mook, WG and Waterbolk, HT, eds, Internatl symposium, Archaeology and 14C, 2nd, Proc. PACT.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Radiocarbon
  • ISSN: 0033-8222
  • EISSN: 1945-5755
  • URL: /core/journals/radiocarbon
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed