Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-23T17:53:22.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aggregate Investment and Output in the U.K

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Get access

Abstract

In this paper we have a threefold objective. Firstly, to identify the principal macroeconomic determinants of U.K. private sector investment. Secondly, to examine the effects of private investment on aggregate supply. Finally, we attempt to integrate the effects of public sector investment and pricing on private sector output.

Investigators have modelled private sector or manufacturing investment behaviour in a variety of ways. The neoclassical tradition, associated with Jorgenson (1963), explains investment expenditures in terms of the lagged capital stock, expected output and a distributed lag on the cost of capital. The most recent effort along these lines on U.K. data is the paper by Bean (1981). Although he found significant negative effects of the change in interest rates and the real cost of capital on the change in investment he failed to obtain satisfactory estimates of long-run cost of capital effects on the level of investment. Thus investment was determined solely in relation to output in the steady state. Alternatives to the neoclassical formulation have been proposed in the form of the multiplier-accelerator model and Tobin’s q model, in which changes to the capital stock incur adjustment costs. The former, which have been widely used in macroeconomic models, have generally failed to predict turning points in investment. Oulton (1981) and Dinenis (1984) have had moderate success with q models for the U.K. The major difficulty encountered is that of rationalising the existence of a lag structure for q, the ratio of market value to the current replacement asset cost.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1984 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

City University, London.

References

Bean, C.R. (1981), An Econometric Model of Manufacturing Investment, Economic Journal, March, pp. 106121.Google Scholar
Beenstock, M., Dalziel, A.I. and Mavromatis, T. (1983), The Demand for Energy in the United Kingdom 1983–2000, City University Business School Discussion Paper, September.Google Scholar
Beenstock, M. and Dalziel, A.I. (1984), The Effects of Public Sector Investment on Aggregate Supply in the United Kingdom, City University Business School Discussion Paper, April.Google Scholar
Beenstock, M. and Warburton, P.J. (1984), An Econometric Model of the U.K. Labour Market, City University Business School Discussion Paper, March.Google Scholar
Bruno, M. and Sachs, J. (1982), Input Price Shocks and the Slowdown in Economic Growth: The Case of U.K. Manufacturing, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 50, pp. 679705.Google Scholar
Dinenis, E. (1984), Modelling Manufacturing Investment; a q approach, Centre for Labour Economics, L.S.E. Discussion Paper, N°. 636.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.N. (1963), Capital Theory and Investment Behaviour, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, pp. 247259.Google Scholar
Klein, L.R. (1983), The Economics of Supply and Demand, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nickell, S.J. and Andrews, M. (1983), Unions, Real Wages and Employment in Britain, 1951–79, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 35, pp. 183206.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. (1981), Aggregate Investment and Tobin’s Q: the Evidence from Britain, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 33, pp. 177200.Google Scholar