Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:49:21.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Author and Authenticity in Conring’s New Discourse on the Roman-German Emperor: A Seventeenth-Century Case Study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Constantin Fasolt
Constantin Fasolt*
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hermann Conring (1606-1681) disavowed responsibility for the New Discourse on the Roman-German Emperor (1642) because it was a pirated reprint of a dissertation prepared by one of his students. A closer look, however, reveals that the New Discourse reflects Conring's most radical ideas more faithfully than do works indisputably written by himself even those he wrote expressly in order to correct the misrepresentations of which the New Discourse was allegedly guilty. That suggests that concepts of authorship and authenticity may conceal the true relationship between writers and their ideas.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , Spring 2001 , pp. 188 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allgemeine deutsche Biographic 1875-1912. Ed. Historische Commission bei der Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 56 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1975. How to do Things with Words. Eds. J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisa (William James lectures). 2d ed. Cambridge, MA.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Google Scholar
Berengarius, J. 1629. Dcfractura cranii. Ed. Hermann Conring. Leiden.Google Scholar
Billichius, A. G. 1631. Observationes etparadoxa chemica. Ed. Hermann Conring. Leiden.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1629. Theses variae de moraliprudentia. Leiden.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 164la. Exercitatio de Germanici imperii civibus. Respondent C. W Blume. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 1:516–28.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 164lb. Exercitatio de imperatore Romano Germanico. Respondent Bogislaus Otho von Hoym. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 1:528–42.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1641c . Exercitatio de urbibus Germanicis. Respondent G. Bode. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 1:485–516.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1642. Discursus novus de imperatore Romano-Germanico. N. p.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1643a. De sanguinis generatione et motu naturali opus novum. Helmstedt.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1643b. De origine iuris Germanici commentarius historicus. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 6:77–202.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1643c. Exercitatio de ducibus et comitibus imperii Germanici. Respondent G. A. Struve. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:755–65.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1643d. De imperio Romano Germanorum disputatio prima. Respondent Johann Christian von Boineburg. Helmstedt.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1644a. De Germanorum imperio Romano liber unus. Accessit Francisci Guicciardini discursus de origine secularis potestatis in Romana ecclesia. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 1:26–107.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1644b. Dissertatio de septemviris seu electoribus Germanorum regni et imperii Romani. Respondent H. W Pape. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:777–89.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1647a. De constitutione episcoporum Germaniae. Respondent H. J. Blume. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:699–755.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1647b. Exercitatio de iudiciis reipublicae Germanicae. Respondent C. U. von Burgkstorff. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:864–99.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1654. De finibus imperii Germanici libri duo, quibus iurafinium a prima imperii exordio ad haec nostra usque tempora propugnantur. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 1:114–485.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1655. De imperii Germanici republica acroamata sex historico-politica, seu discursus novi historico-politici de imperii Germanici civibus, urbibus, ducibus et comitibus, electoribus, episcopis et iudiciis, quibus accessit tractatus de imperatore Romano Germanico. Embrun.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1657. De pace perpetua inter imperii Germanici ordines religione dissidentes servanda libelli duo. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:467–90.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1666a. Dissertatio de comitiis imperii Romano-Germanici. Respondent A. H. Engelbrecht. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:789–818.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1666b. Dissertatio de praecipuis negotiis in comitiis imperii Germanici olim et hodienum tractari solitis. Respondent J. C. Becker. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:818–39.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1669. Dissertatio de officialibus imperii Romano-Germanici. Respondent C. E von Burgstorff. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 2:766–77.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1674. Exercitationes academicae de republica imperii Germanici infinitis locis mutatae et auctae, inque unum volumen redactae. Helmstedt.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1694. De Germanorum imperio Romano liber unus, ex autographo beatii auctoris auctus. Accessit Francisci Gucciardini dissertatio de origine secularis potestatis in Romana ecclesia. Ed. Hermann Johann Conring. Helmstedt. Reprint 1730a, 1:26–107.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1730a. Opera. Ed. Johann Wilhelm Goebel. 7 vols. Brunswick. Reprint Aalen, 1970-1973.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1730b. “Discursus ad Lampadium posterior ex manuscripto.” In Opera, ed. Johann Wilhelm Goebel, 2:238–466. Brunswick.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. 1994. Der Ursprung des deutschen Rechts. Ed. Michael Stolleis. Trans. Use Hoffmann-Meckenstock. (Bibliothek des deutschen Staatsdenkens, 3). Frankfurt and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Deutsches biographisches Archiv. 1982-1984. Ed. Bernhard Fabian. Munich and New York.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Richard. 1958. “Jacobus Lampadius: Seine Bedeutung fur die deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte und Staatstheorie.” In Forschungen zu Stoat und Verfassung: Festgabefür Fritz Hartung, eds. Richard Dietrich and Gerhard Oestreich, 163-85. Berlin.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. W. 1981. “German Universities after the Thirty Years War.” History of Universities 1:169–90.Google Scholar
Fasolt, Constantin. 1987. “Conring on History.” In Supplementum Festivum: Studies in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller (Medieval & Renaissance texts & studies, 49), eds. James Hankins, John Monfasani and Frank Purnell, 563-87. Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
Fasolt, Constantin.1997. “A Question of Right: Hermann Conring's ‘New Discourse on the Roman-German Emperor.'” Sixteenth Century Journal 28:739–58.Google Scholar
Goldast von Haiminsfeld, Melchior. 1611-1614. Monarchia sacri Romani imperii, sive tractatus de iurisdictione imperali seu regia etpontifica seu sacerdotali; deque potestate imperatoris ac papae, cum distinctione utriusque regiminis, politici et ecclesiastici. 3 vols. Hannover and Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Gross, Hanns. 1975. Empire and Sovereignty: A History of the Public Law Literature in the Holy Roman Empire, 1599-1804. Chicago.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1913-1925. De iure belli ac pads libri tres. Ed. James Brown Scott. Trans. Francis W. Kelsey. 2 vols. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Herberger, Patricia, and Stolleis, Michael. 1981. Hermann Conring, 1606-1681: Ein Gelehrter der Universitat Helmstedt. (Ausstellung der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbuttel im Juleum Helmstedt, 12. Dez. 1981 bis 31. Marz 1982.) Wolfenbuttel.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan. With selected variants from the Latin edition of 1688. Ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Hasso. 1995. “Hugo Grotius.” In Staatsdenker in der friihen Neuzeit, ed. Michael Stolleis, 52-77. 3rd. ed. Munich.Google Scholar
Kelly, William Ashford, and Stolleis, Michael. 1983. “Hermann Conring: Gedruckte Werke, 1627-1751.” In Hermann Conring (1606-1681): Beitrage zu Leben und Werk (Historische Forschungen, 23.), ed. Michael Stolleis, 535-72. Berlin.Google Scholar
Knoll, Robert. 1889. Hermann Conring als Historiker. Rostock.Google Scholar
Kossert, Karl. 1939. Hermann Conrings rechtsgeschichtliches Verdienst. Cologne.Google Scholar
Kundert, Werner. 1983. “Hermann Conring als Professor der Universitat Helmstedt.” In Hermann Conring (1606-1681): Beitrage zu Leben und Werk (Historische Forschungen, 23.), ed. Michael Stolleis, 399-412. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kundert, Werner. 1984. Katalog der Helmstedter juristischen Disputationen, Programme undReden, 1574-1810. (Repertorien zur Erforschung der friihen Neuzeit, 8.) Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Lampadius, Jacob. 1620. De iurisdictione, iuribus principum et statuum imperii. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lampadius, Jacob. 1634. Tractatus de constitutione imperii Romano-Germanici. Ed. Hermann Conring. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lampadius, Jacob. 1640. Tractatus de republica Romano-Germanica. Ed. Hermann Conring. Helmstedt.Google Scholar
Lampadius, Jacob. 1642. Tractatus de republica Romano-Germanica. Editio tenia, auctior et emendatior. Ed. Hermann Conring. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lampadius, Jacob. 1671. De republica Romano-Germanica … cum annotatis Hermanni Conringii. Ed. Hermann Conring. Helmstedt. Reprint of Conring, 1730a, 2:22–237.Google Scholar
Lang, Walter. 1970. Stoat und Souverdnitat bei Hermann Conring. Augsburg.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, Gertrude. 1984. “Die Bedeutung der Lehre von den vier Weltreichen fur das Staatsrecht des romisch-deutschen Reichs.” Der Staat 23:369–89.Google Scholar
Luig, Klaus. 1983. “Conring, das deutsche Recht und die Rechtsgeschichte.” In Hermann Conring (1606-1681): Beitrdge zu Leben und Werk (Historische Forschungen, 23), ed. Michael Stolleis, 355-95. Berlin.Google Scholar
Marsiglio of Padua. 1993. Writings on the Empire: “Defensor minor“and “De translatione imperii.” Trans. Cary J. Nederman. (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought.) Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mazzacane, Aldo. 1983. “Conring, Baronio e la storia della costituzione germanica.” In Hermann Conring (1606-1681): Beitrdge zu Leben und Werk (Historische Forschungen, 23), ed. Michael Stolleis, 255-70. Berlin.Google Scholar
Moeller, Ernst von. 1915. Hermann Conring, der Vorkdmpfer des deutschen Rechts, 1606-1681. (Quellen und Darstellungen zur Geschichte Niedersachsens, 31.) Hannover.Google Scholar
Neddermeyer, Uwe. 1988. Das Mittelalter in der deutschen Historiographie vom 15. bis zum 18. Jahrhundert: Geschichtsgliederung und Epochenverstdndnis in der friihen Neuzeit. (Kolner historische Abhandlungen, 34.) Cologne and Vienna.Google Scholar
Neue deutsche Biographic 1953. Ed. Historische Kommission bei der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin.Google Scholar
Peterse, Hans. 2000. “Johann Christian von Boineburg und die Mainzer Irenik des 17. Jahrhunderts.” In Union - Konversion - Toleranz: Dimensionen der Anndherung zwischen den christlichen Konfessionen im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Veroffentlichungen des Instituts für Europaische Geschichte Mainz, Beiheft 50), eds. Heinz Duchhardt and Gerhard May, 105-18. Mainz.Google Scholar
Saring, Hans. 1955. “Boineburg, Johann Christian Frhr. v.” In Neue Deutsche Biographie, ed. Historische Kommission bei der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2:424–25. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schubart-Fikentscher, Gertrud. 1970. Untersuchungen zur Autorschaft von Dissertationen im Zeitalter der Aufkldrung. (Sitzungsberichte der Sachsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, phil.-hist. Kl., 114/5.) Berlin.Google Scholar
Seifert, Arno. 1990. Der Ruckzug der biblischen Prophetic von der neueren Geschichte: Studien zur Geschichte der Reichstheologie des fruhneuzeitlichen deutschen Protestantismus. (Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, Beiheft 31.) Cologne and Vienna.Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael, ed. 1983. Hermann Conring (1606-1681): Beitrdge zu Leben und Werk. (Historische Forschungen, Bd. 23.) Berlin.Google Scholar
Tacitus. 1635. De moribus Germanorum. Ed. Hermann Conring. Helmstedt.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1992. Philosophy and Government, 1572-1651. (Ideas in Context, 26.) Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tully, James, ed. 1988. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ultsch, Eva. 1936. Johann Christian von Boineburg: Ein Beitrag zur Geistesgeschichte des 17. Jahrhunderts. Wiirzburg.Google Scholar
Weisert, Hermann. 1994. “Die Reichstitel bis 1806.” Archiv fur Diplomatik 40:441–513.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. 1984. “Zum Geleit.” In Katalog der Helmstedter juristischtn Disputationen, Programme und Reden, 1574-1810 (Repertorien zur Erforschung der friihen Neuzeit, 8), ed. Werner Kundert, 11-15. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Willoweit, Dietmar. 1983. “Kaiser, Reich und Reichsstande bei Hermann Conring. “ In Hermann Conring (1606-1681): Beitrdge zu Leben und Werk (Historische Forschungen, 23), ed. Michael Stolleis, 321-34. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wolf, Erik. 1963. “Hermann Conring.” In Erik Wolf, Grosse Rechtsdenker der deutschen Geistesgeschichte, 220-52. 4th ed. Tubingen.Google Scholar