No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Plural Planet: A Democratic Culture of Earthlings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2024
Abstract
We are entering the age of planetary politics defined by consciousness of human impact on the Earth System, and the planetary ecosystem's responses to our activities. This poses a major challenge to democratic theory. How do we protect life without evoking a planetary sovereign? This article argues that the planetary condition requires imaginatively expanding existing democratic concepts to make room for new connections, realities, and beginnings. It demonstrates this by focusing on Hannah Arendt's notion of plurality as the law of the earth. Read through the Roman lex, which emerges from the conflict between the plebs and the patricians, this notion helps us imagine a planetary politics premised on the creation of new relationships between previously discrete entities. Building on this interpretation, I discuss scientific expertise and indigenous perspectives as modes of cultivating political imagination to expand our understanding of the democratic stage beyond the human species.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame
References
1 Arendt, Hannah, Denktagebuch: 1950 bis 1973, ed. Ludz, Ursula and Nordmann, Ingeborg (Munich: Piper, 2003), 714Google Scholar.
2 Latour, Bruno, Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime (Cambridge: Polity, 2018), 44Google Scholar. Latour's point, as I understand it, is less about the absolute size of the global population and more about the awareness of our collective impact on the planet and its ecosystem(s).
3 Chakrabarty, Dipesh et al., “A Symposium on Dipesh Chakrabarty's The Climate of History in a Planetary Age,” Review of Politics 84, no. 4 (April 2022): 592–612Google Scholar; Wainwright, Joel and Mann, Geoff, Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future (London: Verso, 2018)Google Scholar.
4 Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1st ed. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1951), 414–19Google Scholar; Arendt, Hannah, Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism (New York: Schocken Books, 1994), 309–10Google Scholar.
5 Arendt, Denktagebuch, 48.
6 Toivanen, T. et al., “The Many Anthropocenes: A Transdisciplinary Challenge for the Anthropocene Research,” Anthropocene Review 4, no. 3 (2017): 183–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dryzek, John S. and Pickering, Jonathan, The Politics of the Anthropocene (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 5Google Scholar; Chakrabarty, Dipesh, The Climate of History in a Planetary Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021), 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Wainwright and Mann, Climate Leviathan, 15, 28–29. They also discuss noncapitalist climate Mao and climate Behemoth, which opposes planetary sovereignty while sticking with capitalism.
8 Wainwright and Mann, Climate Leviathan, 173. I am not as convinced as they are that capitalism can be kept in existence, on a global scale, even if backed up with sovereign power.
9 Myers, Ella, Worldly Ethics: Democratic Politics and Care for the World (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013)Google Scholar; Zerilli, Linda, Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), 16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Honig, Bonnie, Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 4, 28–29, 50Google Scholar.
10 Mouffe, Chantal, Towards a Green Democratic Revolution: Left Populism and the Power of Affects (London: Verso, 2022)Google Scholar.
11 Hannah Arendt, The Life of the Mind, vol. 1, Thinking (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1978), 19–20. I touch on some of these themes in “Amor Tellus? For a Material Culture of Care,” HannahArendt.net 11, no. 1, 96–114.
12 Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018), 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (London: Penguin Books, 2006), 179Google Scholar.
14 Hans Asenbaum and Amanda Machin, “The Nonhuman Condition: Radical Democracy through New Materialist Lenses,” Contemporary Political Theory (2023), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-023-00635-3.
15 Patchen Markell, “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Archê, and Democracy,” American Political Science Review 100, no. 1 (February 2006): 4, 11.
16 Linda Zerilli, Feminism and the Abyss, 12.
17 Arendt, Human Condition, 1.
18 Ibid., 2.
19 Ibid., 3, 10.
20 Arendt, Hannah, Thinking without a Banister: Essays in Understanding, 1953–1975 (New York: Schocken Books, 2018), 407Google Scholar; See also Arendt, Human Condition, 257–60, 291–94.
21 Arendt, Life of the Mind, 1:26–27.
22 Parr, Adrian, Earthlings: Imaginative Encounters with the Natural World (New York: Columbia University Press, 2022), 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Latour, Down to Earth, 71–75. See also Belcher, Oliver and Schmidt, Jeremy J., “Being Earthbound: Arendt, Process and Alienation in the Anthropocene,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 39, no. 1 (2021): 103–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
23 Arendt, Hannah, Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (London: Penguin Books, 2006), 274Google Scholar.
24 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 437.
25 Francis Bacon, The Masculine Birth of Time, in The Philosophy of Francis Bacon: An Essay on Its Development from 1603 to 1609, by Benjamin Farrington (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1964), 62.
26 Arendt, Human Condition, 139–40.
27 Chakrabarty, The Climate of History, 67.
28 Moore, Jason W., Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital (New York: Verso, 2015)Google Scholar; Malm, Andreas, Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming (London: Verso, 2016)Google Scholar; Foster, John Bellamy, Capitalism in the Anthropocene: Ecological Ruin or Ecological Revolution (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2022)Google Scholar; I have made a related argument from an Arendtian perspective elsewhere, see Hyvönen, Ari-Elmeri, “Labor as Action: The Human Condition in the Anthropocene,” Research in Phenomenology 50, no. 2 (2020): 240–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 My argument is inspired by Robin Wall Kimmerer, a botanical scientist and a member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, who notes that her students are well aware of the negative interactions between humans and nature, but strikingly unable to “even imagine what beneficial relations between their species and others might look like.” Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants (New York: Penguin Books, 2020), 6.
30 Arendt, Hannah and Jaspers, Karl, Correspondence, 1926–1969 (London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992), 264Google Scholar.
31 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 438.
32 Arendt, Denktagebuch, 130.
33 Arendt, Hannah, The Jewish Writings (New York: Schocken Books, 2007), 466Google Scholar.
34 Arendt, Denktagebuch, 564.
35 Parr, Earthlings, 4–5.
36 Arendt, Denktagebuch, 216.
37 Arendt, Hannah, The Promise of Politics (New York: Schocken Books, 2005), 185–86Google Scholar.
38 Mouffe, Chantal, On the Political (London: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar.
39 Arendt, Promise of Politics, 177–80; Hannah Arendt, On Revolution, 179–80.
40 Street, Ella, “Judgment in the Fourth-Century BCE Athenian Courts as Anti-Tragedy: Demosthenes's On the Crown,” Review of Politics 84, no. 4 (2022): 497–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
41 James Tully, “Reconciliation Here on Earth,” in Resurgence and Reconciliation: Indigenous-Settler Relations and Earth Teachings, ed. Michael Asch, John Borrows, and James Tully (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), 83.
42 Ferguson, Lucien, “From Love to Care: Arendt's Amor Mundi in the Ethical Turn,” Political Theory 50, no. 6 (2022): 939–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Butler, Judith, Towards a Performative Theory of Assembly (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015), 44–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 Zerilli, Linda M. G., A Democratic Theory of Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016), xiiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Arendt, Thinking without a Banister, 226, emphasis added.
45 Hannah Arendt, Complete Works: Critical Edition, vol. 6, The Modern Challenge to Tradition: Fragmente Eines Buchs (Göttingen: Wallstein, 2018), 253.
46 Arendt, On Revolution, 166–67.
47 Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, 25.
48 Arendt, On Revolution, 194–95.
49 Hyvönen, “Amor Tellus?,” 99.
50 Purdy, Jedediah, After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018), 3, 15Google Scholar; Wapner, Paul, “The Changing Nature of Nature: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene,” Global Environmental Politics 14, no. 4 (2014): 36, 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51 McCarthy, Mary, Birds of America (New York: Penguin Books, 2018), 307Google Scholar.
52 McCarthy, Mary and Arendt, Hannah, Between Friends: The Correspondence of Hannah Arendt and Mary McCarthy 1949–1975 (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1995), 293Google Scholar; see also 276–77. Possibly this was McCarthy's point too, as her biographer Carole Brightman points out, in Writing Dangerously (San Diego: Harvest, 1994), 530. However, the idea of reestablishing “Nature in her natural place” clearly seems to hold sway over McCarthy, even though she recognizes the impossibility of the thought.
53 Myers, Worldly Ethics, 86; Honig, Public Things.
54 Myers, Worldly Ethics, 90; see also Connolly, William E., Climate Machines, Fascist Drives, and Truth (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019), 3–5, 42Google Scholar.
55 Arendt, Human Condition, 139.
56 Haraway, Donna J., Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016)Google Scholar; Frost, Samantha, Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016)Google Scholar.
57 Arendt, Between Past and Future, 208.
58 Ibid.
59 Arendt, Thinking without a Banister, 166–174; Hyvönen, “Amor Tellus?,” 103.
60 Arendt, Between Past and Future, 209.
61 Tsao, Roy T., “Arendt against Athens: Rereading The Human Condition,” Political Theory 30, no. 1 (2002): 97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See Tsao's commentary on Arendt's rejection of the Periclean aspiration to achieve greatness without resorting to poetry (113).
62 Arendt, Between Past and Future, 210–11, 221–22.
63 Quote from “Reflexionen zur Logik” (1820), cited in Arendt, Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 30 and alluded to in McCarthy, The Birds, 306. Cf. Hyvönen, “Amor Tellus?,” 104.
64 Darwin, Charles, The Origin of Species (London: HarperCollins, 2011), 564Google Scholar.
65 Arendt, Life of the Mind, 20.
66 Gerardo Ceballos, Anne H. Ehrlich, and Paul R. Ehrlich, The Annihilation of Nature: Human Extinction of Birds and Mammals (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015), 22.
67 Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, 28–30.
68 Zerilli, Feminism and the Abyss, 162.
69 Pack, Justin, “Amor Mundi: Reading Arendt alongside Native American Philosophy,” Sophia 60, no. 2 (2021): 277–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
70 Wapner, “Changing Nature of Nature,” 45; Edwin Ogar, Gretta Pecl, and Tero Mustonen, “Science Must Embrace Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge to Solve Our Biodiversity Crisis,” One Earth 3, no. 2 (August 2020): 162–65; Stephen T. Garnett et al., “A Spatial Overview of the Global Importance of Indigenous Lands for Conservation,” Nature Sustainability 1, no. 7 (July 2018): 369–74.
71 Voice, Paul, “Consuming the World: Hannah Arendt on Politics and the Environment,” Journal of International Political Theory 9, no. 2 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chapman, Anne, “The Ways That Nature Matters: The World and the Earth in the Thought of Hannah Arendt,” Environmental Values 16, no. 4 (2007): 433–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Paul Ott, “World and Earth: Hannah Arendt and the Human Relationship to Nature,” Ethics, Place & Environment 12, no. 1 (March 2009): 1–16.
72 Paul Voice, “Consuming the World,” 179.
73 Ephraim, Laura, “Save the Appearances! Toward an Arendtian Environmental Politics,” American Political Science Review 116, no. 3 (2022): 985–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
74 Diego Rossello, “The Animal Condition in the Human Condition: Rethinking Arendt's Political Action beyond the Human Species,” Contemporary Political Theory 21, no. 2 (June 2022): 219–39.
75 Markell, “Rule of the People,” 12.
76 Hannah Arendt, Was Ist Politik? Fragmente aus dem Nachlass (Munich: Piper, 2003), 105–6. Regrettably, the passage concludes with one of the most blatantly Eurocentric statements in Arendt's corpus on the “worldlessness” of Native Americans.
77 Arendt, Promise of Politics, 112.
78 Arendt, Human Condition, 176; Ephraim, “Save the Appearances!,” 992.
79 Arendt, Life of the Mind, 19.
80 Ibid., 21–36.
81 Ibid., 21.
82 For a strong argument for seeing animals as actors in the political space, see Donaldson, Sue, “Animal Agora: Animal Citizens and the Democratic Challenge,” Social Theory and Practice 46, no. 4 (2020): 709–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
83 Arendt, Modern Challenge to Tradition, 187.
84 Zerilli, Feminism and the Abyss, 152.
85 Arendt, Life of the Mind, 50–53.
86 For a fascinating argument building on biosemantics to expand the political notion of communication, see Romero, Javier and Dryzek, John S., “Grounding Ecological Democracy: Semiotics and the Communicative Networks of Nature,” Environmental Values 30, no. 4 (August 2021): 407–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
87 Arendt, Hannah, Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy, ed. Beiner, Ronald (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), 75–76Google Scholar.
88 Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, 58.
89 Ibid., 56.
90 Disch, Lisa, “Representation as ‘Spokespersonship’: Bruno Latour's Political Theory,” Parallax 14, no. 3 (2008): 88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
91 Raymond Zhong, “Something Was Messing With Earth's Axis. The Answer Has to Do With Us,” New York Times, June 28, 2023.
92 Arendt, Hannah, Crises of the Republic (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1972), 120Google Scholar.
93 Ibid., 120.
94 Arendt, Thinking without a Banister, 220–22.
95 Cf. Shiva, Vandana, Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability, and Peace (Cambridge, MA: South End, 2005), 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a related Arendtian argument, see Ephraim, “Save the Appearances!,” 985–86, 989.
96 Arendt, Thinking without a Banister, 418.
97 Cited in Yaden, David B. et al., “The Overview Effect: Awe and Self-Transcendent Experience in Space Flight,” Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 3, no. 1 (March 2016): 3Google Scholar, accessed June 28, 2023.
98 Parr, Earthlings, 76.
99 Arendt, Was Ist Politik?, 96; Zerilli, Feminism and the Abyss, 129.
100 Zerilli, Feminism and the Abyss, 146.