Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:01:10.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tocqueville and Local Government: Distinguishing Democracy's Second Track

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Robert T. Gannett Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In arguing for democracy's universal promotion in the world today, America's leaders simplify democracy's procedural requirements and reduce the nature and degree of participation required of its citizens. Tocqueville's more sophisticated analysis of the essential underpinnings of a healthy democratic society argues that the genius of American democracy lies in its juxtaposition of two separate democratic tracks, one national and the other local. On one track, to be sure, he situated the broad freedoms assured by our deftly balanced national constitution. But he assigned equal pride of place to a complementary track of robust “secondary liberties.” After recounting Tocqueville's lifelong effort to determine the appropriate levels of such local engagement, indexed to considerations of religion, national security, and the progress of civilization itself, the essay explains that Tocqueville never took for granted democratic political transitions, seeing them as products of human wisdom and choice, not historical necessity.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , Fall 2005 , pp. 721 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For a fuller discussion of each level of Tocqueville's investigations, see Gannett, Robert T. Jr, “Bowling Ninepins in Tocqueville's Township,” American Political Science Review 97, no. 1 (2003): 1–16Google Scholar. Several commentators have highlighted Tocqueville's views on the importance of local government in Democracy in America, among them Koritansky, John, “Decentralization and Civic Virtue in Tocqueville's `New Science of Politics,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 5 (1975): 63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schleifer, James, The Making of Tocqueville's Democracy in America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980), pp. 161–84Google Scholar; Engster, Dan, “Democracy in the Balance: The Role of Statist, Liberal, and Republican Institutions in Tocqueville's Theory of Liberty,” Polity 30, no. 3 (1998): 489–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maletz, Donald J., “The Spirit of Tocqueville's Democracies,” Polity 30, no. 3 (1998): 513–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Kincaid, John, “Federal Democracy and Liberty,” Political Science & Politics 32, no. 2 (06 1999): 211–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Tocqueville articulated his secondary local liberties/ “great political liberty” continuum on several occasions throughout his life, as in his letter of October 10, 1836, to Kergorlay, Louis de (Alexis de Tocqueville: Oeuvres complètes [hereafter OC], ed. Mayer, J.-P., 17 vols, in 28 pts. to date [Paris: Gallimard, 1951–], XIII, pt. 1, pp. 407–8)Google Scholar and in his “Speech on the Roman expedition delivered in the Legislative National Assembly on 18 October 1849” (Recollections: The French Revolution of 1848, ed. Mayer, J.-P. and Kerr, A.P., trans. Lawrence, George [New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1987], pp. 300–301)Google Scholar.

3. Carothers, Thomas, “The End of the Transition Paradigm,” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1 (2002): 9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Tocqueville, , Democracy in America, trans., ed., and with an introduction by Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 29, 262, 490, 497, 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Subsequent references to Democracy will be to this edition, with occasional revisions of translation, and included in parentheses in the text.

5. Tocqueville, , note of 08 14, 1836, cited in De la démocratie en Amérique, ed. Nolla, Eduardo (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1990), 2:248nGoogle Scholar.

6. Tocqueville, to Gobineau, Arthur de, 10 22, 1843, OC, IX, p. 69Google Scholar.

7. “Notes on the Koran (March 1838),” in Tocqueville, , Writings on Empire and Slavery, ed. and trans. Pitts, Jennifer (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001), p. 33Google Scholar.

8. “Why one does not find a priesthood among the Moslems,” OC, III, pt. 1, pp. 173–75Google Scholar. See, too, Tocqueville, to Kergorlay, , 03 21,1838, OC, XIII, pt. 2, pp. 28–29Google Scholar.

9. Goldstein, Doris S., Trial of Faith: Religion and Politics in Tocqueville's Thought (New York and Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., 1975), pp. 113–17Google Scholar.

10. Unlike with Islam, Tocqueville viewed Catholicism's collusion with the political power as accidental and temporary, not permanent, and thus capable of correction. See Tocqueville, , The Old Regime and the Revolution: Volume One, ed. Furet, François and Mélonio, Françoise, trans. Kahan, Alan S. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), pp. 96–97Google Scholar. See, too, Tocqueville's comments in Democracy in America regarding the peculiarly powerful appeal of Roman Catholicism's discipline and unity to democratic citizens (DA, 424–25)Google Scholar.

11. Tocqueville, , The Old Regime, p. 101Google Scholar.

12. Zuckert, Catherine H., “The Role of Religion in Preserving American Liberty—Tocqueville's Analysis 150 Years Later,” in Liberty, Equality, Democracy, ed. Nolla, Eduardo (New York: New York University Press, 1992), p. 25Google Scholar.

13. Tocqueville, to Stoffels, Eugène, 10 5, 1836, in Alexis de Tocqueville: Selected Letters on Politics and Society, ed. Boesche, Roger, trans. Toupin, James and Boesche, Roger (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), p. 113Google Scholar. See, too, Schmitter, Philippe C., “Federalism and the Euro-Polity,” journal of Democracy 11, no. 1 (2000): 40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14. Gannett, Robert T. Jr, Tocqueville Unveiled: The Historian and His Sources for “The Old Regime and the Revolution” (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), pp. 106, 64, 76Google Scholar. See, too, Tocqueville, , Democracy in America, p. 154Google Scholar, for his description of the way in which political passions spread “instantaneously over the whole area of the country like a sheet of flames” in a nation devoid of local governments.

15. For Tocqueville's general writings on local governmental issues during the July Monarchy, see OC, X, pp. 593–702Google Scholar. For a thorough review of his investigations into the care of abandoned children, see Drolet, Michael, Tocqueville, Democracy and Social Reform (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 161–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. “Incident of the appeal to the General Councils,” OC, III, pt. 2, pp. 192–93.Google Scholar

17. “Report Given before the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences on January 15, 1848, on the Subject of M. Cherbuliez′ Book Entitled On Democracy in Switzerland,” in Tocqueville, , Democracy in America, ed. Mayer, J.-P., trans. Lawrence, George (Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company, 1969), p. 749.Google Scholar

18. Ibid., pp. 741–42, 746–47.

19. Tocqueville, , The Old Regime, p. 210.Google Scholar

20. Diamond, Larry, “Thinking About Hybrid Regimes,” Journal of Democracy, 13, no. 2 (2002): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Huntington, Samuel P., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991), p. 16.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., p. 27.

23. See, for example, Fukuyama, Francis, “The March of Equality,” Journal of Democracy, 11, no. 1 (2000): 11–17,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Ferguson, Niall, “Overdoing Democracy,” review of The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad, by Zakaria, Fareed, The New York Times Book Review, 13 04 2003, p. 9.Google Scholar

24. For a fuller consideration of how “two types of regimes, therefore, and only two can be established on this social base [generated by equality of conditions],” see Manent, Pierre, Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy, trans. Waggoner, John (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996), pp. 2–12.Google Scholar

25. Carothers, Thomas, “The End of the Transition Paradigm,” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1 (2002): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. See the mission statements of four leading community organizing training institutes which today focus chiefly on developing “church-based” organizations across America: “www.piconetwork.org,” “www.gamaliel.org,” “www.thedartcenter.org,” and “www.industrialareasfoundation.org.”

27. See, for example, Malley, Robert and Hiltermann, Joost, “Think Small in Iraq,” New York Times, 11 30, 2004, sec. 1, A27.Google Scholar

28. Bryan, Frank M., Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar For an overview of American local governments, see Ostrom, Vincent, Bish, Robert, and Ostrom, Elinor, Local Government in the United States (San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1988).Google Scholar

29. Tocqueville, , “Report Given before the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences on January 15, 1848,” p. 740.Google Scholar

30. The classic statement of “the struggle in any democracy between unitary and adversary forces” is that of Mansbridge, Jane J., Beyond Adversary Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 39–135.Google Scholar

31. Tocqueville, , The Old Regime, p. 283.Google Scholar

32. For comments on parallel tensions in Tocqueville's associational views, see Boyd, Richard, Uncivil Society: The Perils of Pluralism and the Making of Modern Liberalism (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, Rowman and Littlefield, 2004), pp. 231–34.Google Scholar