Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:02:30.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caring for older people with dementia: is there a case for the use of multisensory environments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

KW Hope
KW Hope*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
*
School of Nursing Studies, Coupland Building III, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Nursing
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 1996 , pp. 169 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Baker, DE. Attitudes of nurses to the care of the elderly [Thesis]. Manchester: Victoria University of Manchester, 1978.Google Scholar
2Koch, GA. Towards fourth generation evaluation: listening to the voices of older patients. A hermeneutic enquiry [Thesis]. Manchester: Victoria University of Manchester, 1993.Google Scholar
3Armstrong-Esther, CA, Browne, KD. The influence of elderly patients' mental impairment on nurse-patient interaction. J Adv Nurs 1986; 11: 379–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Fielding, P. Attitudes revisited. London: Royal College of Nursing, 1986.Google Scholar
5Liukkonen, A. Quality of care on a psychogeriatric nursing unit in Finland: focus on interaction skills. Geriatr Nurs 1992; 13: 167–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Sekuler, R, Blake, R. Sensory underload. Psychol Today 1987; 21: 48–51.Google Scholar
7Weiffenbach, JM, Tylenda, CA, Baum, BJ. Oral sensory changes in aging. J Gerontol 1990; 45: 121–25.Google Scholar
8Holden, U. Dementia in acute units: aggression. Nurs Standard 1994; 9: 37–39.Google Scholar
9Hopkins, V. Dementia in acute units: communication. Nurs Standard 1994; 9: 25–26.Google Scholar
10Turner, P. Activity nursing and the changes in the quality of life of elderly patients: a semiquantitative study. J Adv Nurs 1993; 18: 1727–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Friedman, E, Katcher, A, Lynch, JJ. Animal companions and first year survival of patients after discharge from a coronary care unit. Pub Health Rep 1980; 95: 4–5.Google Scholar
12Baun, M, Bergstrom, N, Largston, N. Physiological effects of human/companion animal bonding. Nurs Res 1984; 3(33): 126–29.Google Scholar
13Furstenberg, FF. Short-term value of pets. Am J Nurs 1988; 88: 157–58.Google Scholar
14Hale, N. Animal house. Geriatr Nurs Home Care 1989; 9: 12–13.Google Scholar
15Lewis, CN. Reminiscing and self concept in old age. J Gerontol 1971; 21: 240–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Fielden, MA. Reminiscence as a therapeutic intervention with sheltered housing residents: a comparative study. Br J Soc Work 1990; 20: 21–44.Google Scholar
17Meriam, S, Cross, L. Aging, reminiscence and life satisfaction. Activitites, Adapt Aging 1981; 2: 39–50.Google Scholar
18Fallot, RD. The impact of mood on verbal reminiscing in late adulthood. Int J Aging Hum Dev 1980; 10: 385–400.Google Scholar
19McMahon, A, Ruddick, P. Reminiscing. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1964; 10: 292–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Coleman, PG. Ageing and reminiscence processes: social and clinical implications. Chichester: Wiley, 1986.Google Scholar
21Henry, J. Dementia: aroma groups improve the quality of life in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Aromather 1993; 5: 27–29.Google Scholar
22West, B, Brockman, S. The calming power of aromatherapy. J Dementia Care 1994; 2: 20–22.Google Scholar
23Mitchell, S. Dementia: aromatherapy's effectiveness in disorders associated with dementia. Int J Aromather 1993; 5: 20–23.Google Scholar
24Haggar, LE, Hutchinson, RB. Snoezelen: an approach to the leisure resource for people with profound multiple handicap. Mental Handicap 1991; 19: 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Ayres, AJ. Sensory integration and praxis tests. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1989.Google Scholar
26Yack, E. Sensory integration: a survey of its use in the clinical setting. Can J Occup Ther 1989; 56: 229–35.Google Scholar
27Pinkney, L, Barker, P. Snoezelen – an evaluation of an environment used by people who are elderly and confused. In: Hutchinson, R, Kewin, J eds. Sensations and disability: sensory environments for leisure, Snoezelen, education and therapy. Chesterfield: Rompa, 1994: 172–83.Google Scholar
28Benson, S. Sniff and doze therapy. J Dementia Care 1994; 2: 12–14.Google Scholar
29Fisher, AG, Murray, EA. Introduction to sensory integration theory. In: Fisher, AG, Murray, EA, Bundy, AC eds. Sensory integration: theory and practice. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1991: 3–26.Google Scholar
30Ottenbacher, K, Short, MA. Sensory integrative dysfunction in children: a review of theory and treatment. In: Routh, D, Wolrich, M eds. Advances in developmental and behavioural paediatrics, Volume 6. Greenwich, CT: JAL, 1985: 287–329.Google Scholar
31Kater, KM. Response of head-injured patients to sensory stimulation. West J Nurs Res 1989; 11: 20–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Walsh, R. Sensory environments, brain damage and drugs: a review of interactions and mediating mechanisms. Int J Neurosci 1981; 14: 129–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Ferchmin, PA, Bennett, EL. Direct contact with enriched environment is required to alter cerebral weight in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1975; 88: 360–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Finger, S, Stein, DG. Brain damage and recovery. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
35Long, AP, Haig, L. How do clients benefit from Snoezelen? An exploratory study. Br J Occup Ther 1992; 55: 103–106.Google Scholar
36Hutchinson, R, Haggar, L. The development and evaluation of a Snoezelen leisure resource for people with severe multiple disability. In: Hutchinson, R, Kewin, J eds. Sensations and disability: sensory environments for leisure, Snoezelen, education and therapy. Chesterfield: Rompa, 1994: 18–48.Google Scholar
37Deakin, M. Using relaxation techniques to manage disruptive behaviour. Nurs Times 1995; 91(17): 40–41.Google Scholar
38Haggar, L. A short training package for care staff using Snoezelen environments with profoundly and multiply disabled clients: design, implementation and evaluation. In: Hutchinson, R, Kewin, J eds. Sensations and disability: sensory environments for leisure, Snoezelen, education and therapy. Chesterfield: Rompa, 1994: 49–87.Google Scholar
39Bryant, W. Creative group work with confused elderly people: a development of sensory integration therapy. Br J Occup Ther 1991; 54: 187–92.Google Scholar
40Robichaud, L, Hébert, R, Desrosiers, J. Efficacy of a sensory integration program on behaviours of inpatients wtih dementia. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 48: 355–60.Google Scholar
41Threadgold, M. Touching the soul through the senses. J Dementia Care 1995; 3: 18–20.Google Scholar
42Koh, K, Ray, R, Lee, J, Nair, A. Dementia in elderly patients: can the 3R mental stimulation programme improve mental status? Age Ageing 1994; 23: 195–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Moffat, N, Barker, P, Pinkney, L, Garside, M, Freeman, C. Snoezelen: an experience for older people with dementia. Chesterfield: Rompa, 1993.Google Scholar
44Garnham, Hooper L. Multisensory integration or separation? [Letter] Ther Weekly 1995; 22: 5.Google Scholar
45Kewin, J. Snoezelen – the reason and the method. In: Hutchinson, R, Kewin, J eds. Sensations and disability: sensory environments for leisure, Snoezelen, education and therapy. Chesterfield: Rompa, 1994: 6–17.Google Scholar
46Bensink, GW, Godbey, KL, Marshall, MJ, Yarandi, HN. Institutionalized elderly: relaxation, locus of control, self-esteem. J Gerontol Nurs 1992; 18: 30–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Kitwood, T. Towards a theory of dementia care: the interpersonal process. Ageing Soc 1993; 13: 51–67.Google Scholar
48Kewin, J. Sensory environments – a management perspective. In: Hutchinson, R, Kewin, J eds. Sensations and disability: sensory environments for leisure, Snoezelen, education and therapy. Chesterfield: Rompa, 1994: 120–28.Google Scholar
49Howard, S, Wareing, LA. Good vibrations [Letter]. Ther Weekly 1995; 22: 5.Google Scholar
50Kitwood, T. Brain, mind and dementia: with particular reference to Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Soc 1989; 9: 1–15.Google Scholar
51Kitwood, T. The dialectics of dementia: with particular reference to Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Soc 1990; 10: 177–96.Google Scholar
52Kitwood, T, Bredin, K. Towards a theory of dementia care: personhood and well-being. Ageing Soc 1992; 12: 269–87.Google Scholar