Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:14:53.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recovery and germination of seeds after passage through the gut of Kazakh sheep on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2017

Shulin Wang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology
Weihua Lu*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology
Narkes Waly
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology
Chunhui Ma
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology
Qianbing Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology
Chuanjian Wang
Affiliation:
College of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China
*
*Correspondence E-mail: 1051337@qq.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Endozoochorous dispersal of seeds by livestock has long attracted the attention of grassland scientists. However, little is known about seed dispersal after ingestion by Kazakh sheep on dry grasslands in the Tianshan Mountains. The objective of this experiment was to learn more about the recovery and germinability of seeds from 17 plant species after either actual or simulated ingestion (i.e. insertion through a rumen fistula) by Kazakh sheep. The passage time of seeds through the sheep gut ranged from 12 to 96 h. More than 80% of all recovered seeds were defecated 24–48 h after ingestion. The mean retention time of seeds in the gut ranged from 27.3 to 42.2 h. Seed recovery percentage ranged between 12.6 and 17.6% for leguminous species and between 0.8 and 3.2% for gramineous species. Seed recovery percentage was positively correlated with seed mass, but negatively correlated with seed shape. The germination percentages of the gramineous species were greater in the non-ingested treatment (66–98%) than in the simulated ingestion treatment (3–10%). In contrast, for leguminous species, seed germination percentages were greater in the simulated ingestion treatment (23–70%) than in the non-ingested one (5–12%). Seed germination percentage after simulated ingestion was positively correlated with seed mass, but negatively correlated with seed shape. In conclusion, leguminous seeds were more likely than gramineous ones to pass through the gut of Kazakh sheep and then germinate. Free-ranging Kazakh sheep can contribute to the spread of plant species, especially leguminous species, in the Tianshan Mountains.

Type
Research Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017

Introduction

Grazing livestock are one of the most important endozoochorous seed dispersal vectors in grasslands (Archer and Pyke, Reference Archer and Pyke1991; Gökbulak and Call, Reference Gökbulak and Call2009). Seeds can be retained for long periods in the gut of livestock, thus allowing rapid seed dispersal as the animals travel (Pakeman, Reference Pakeman2001; Mouissie et al., Reference Mouissie, Vos, Verhagen and Bakker2005b; Cosyns and Hoffmann, Reference Cosyns and Hoffmann2005). Several reports indicate that seedling emergence and growth are promoted by organic matter and nutrients in livestock dung (Woldu and Saleem, Reference Woldu and Saleem2000; Traveset et al., Reference Traveset, Bermejo. and Willson2001; Nchanji and Plumptre, Reference Nchanji and Plumptre2003). However, other studies indicate that dung can suppress seedling development, especially during early growth stages (Uytvanck et al., Reference Uytvanck, Milotić and Hoffmann2010; Milotić and Hoffman, Reference Milotić and Hoffmann2016). Overall, seed ingestion by livestock can increase species richness and affect large-scale spatial community composition in grazed systems by intensifying intercommunity seed flow (Malo et al., Reference Malo, Jiménez and Suárez2000; Cosyns et al., Reference Cosyns, Claerbout, Lamoot and Hoffmann2005a).

Significant attention has been paid to the role of grazing mammals as endozoochorous dispersers of dry-fruited seeds after Janzen (Reference Janzen1984) proposed the ‘foliage is the fruit’ hypothesis. Researchers have investigated the role of many ruminants in seed dispersal, including cattle (Doucette and Mccaughey, Reference Doucette and Mccaughey2001; Gökbulak and Call, Reference Gökbulak and Call2009), goat (Baraza and Valiente-Banuet, Reference Baraza and Valiente-Banuet2008; Mancilla-Leytón et al., Reference Mancilla-Leytón, Fernández-Alés and Vicente2011), sheep (Manzano et al., Reference Manzano, Malo and Peco2005), sika deer (Ishikawa, Reference Ishikawa2010), yak (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Xu, Wang, Shang and Long2012), and Tibetan sheep (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Xu, Wang, Shang and Long2012). However, little is known about the dispersal of seeds after ingestion by Kazakh sheep grazing on dry grasslands. Compared with other breeds, Kazakh sheep have evolved special adaptations to the harsh environments in which they live (Adeli and Chen, Reference Adeli and Chen2008). Kazakh sheep traditionally graze on dry grasslands on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains in autumn and winter when plant seeds are mature. There are currently 5 million Kazakh sheep on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains (Jia and Wang, Reference Jia and Wang2013).

The retention time of seeds in the digestive tract varies, depending on seed traits as well as on the type of animal (Gökbulak, Reference Gökbulak2003). Blackshaw and Rode (Reference Blackshaw and Rode1991) reported that small seeds passed through the digestive tract of cattle faster than large seeds; however, this relationship was not observed by either Simao and Jones (Reference Simao and Jones1987) or Gökbulak and Call (Reference Gökbulak and Call2009). Digestion can enhance or reduce germination depending on seed traits (Simao and Jones, Reference Simao and Jones1987). Passage through the gut of domestic goats greatly increased the germination of leguminous seeds but reduced the germination of gramineous seeds (Baraza and Valiente-Banuet, Reference Baraza and Valiente-Banuet2008).

Kazakh sheep preferentially consume gramineous and leguminous plants in the dry grasslands of the Tianshan Mountains. However, there is no information about the endozoochorous dispersal of ingested seeds in the natural grasslands of Xinjiang Province. The objectives of this study were (i) to measure the dimensions (i.e. mass, length, width, thickness and shape) of seeds of 17 wild plant species (13 gramineous and 4 leguminous species) that are common on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains, (ii) to determine temporal patterns in the defecation of seeds after ingestion by Kazakh sheep, and (iii) to determine the germinability of seeds after simulated ingestion. The latter objective was accomplished using seeds that had been placed in the rumen of fistulated sheep for 22–46 h.

Materials and methods

Study site

Seed samples were collected in the dry grassland of the Ziniquan sheep breeding farm, which is located on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains (43°56´–44°03´ N, 85°40´–85°59´ E) in Xinjiang Province. The region has a temperate continental climate. The mean annual temperature is 7.2°C. The maximum average monthly temperature is 26.6°C in July. The minimum average monthly temperature is –18.5°C in January. The mean annual precipitation is 231 mm, with most precipitation falling between June and August. This area is important as autumn and winter pasture under the region's traditional grazing system. The vegetation consists predominantly of gramineous and leguminous plants. The soil types are typical grassland chernozem, chestnut soil and calcic brown soil. The grassland types are temperate desert steppe and temperate steppe.

Seed collection and seed attributes

Mature seeds were collected from over 100 individual plants of 17 species between August and October in 2013 (Table 1). The plant species are all perennials. Most of the species are common in temperate grasslands and were previously observed germinating in herbivore dung. The seeds were taken to the laboratory, air dried, and then stored in brown paper envelopes at –4°C to maintain vigor. The seed mass of each species was determined by weighing three subsamples of air-dried seeds (100 seeds per subsample; 0.01 mg precision). The dimensions (length, width and height) of 10 random seeds were measured using a stereoscopic microscope (25 µm precision). Seed length was defined as the longest of the three dimensions. Seed shape (i.e. divergence from sphericity) was expressed as the variance in seed dimension after dividing each dimension by the seed length (Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Band and Hodgson1993) (Table 1).

Table 1. Selected characteristics (mass, length, width, thickness, shape) of the seeds of the perennial plant species used

Test animals and treatments

The six male Kazakh sheep in the study were similar in weight (weight 42 ± 1.25 kg) and in age (2 years old). The sheep were kept in individual metabolic crates (1.4 m × 0.6 m) with a faeces collection system (Fig. 1). The sheep were fed a seed-free diet for 7 days. On day 8, three sheep were fed 3000 seeds of each plant species in a single meal. The seeds were mixed with 300 g of feed concentrate to facilitate intake. The dung pellets of these sheep were collected 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h after ingestion. The pellets were dried at room temperature and then stored in the laboratory. The seeds from the feeding experiment were used to determine seed recovery percentage and mean retention time (MRT).

Figure 1. The individual metabolic crates with a faeces collection system.

The seed recovery percentages were low in the feeding experiment. Therefore, a simulated ingestion experiment was conducted so that there were enough seeds to accurately determine seed germination percentage (Peco et al., Reference Peco, Lopez-Merino and Alvir2006). A permanent rumen fistula was made in the three sheep that were not used in the feeding experiment. Heat-sealed nylon bags (11 cm × 7 cm, 40 µm pore size) containing 100 seeds of each plant species were introduced through the fistula. Most seeds are retained in the rumen for 22–46 h and in a heavily acid part of the gut (abomasum and duodenum) for 2–4 h (Warner, Reference Warner1981). To simulate these conditions, the bags were incubated for 22, 34 or 46 h inside the sheep rumen. After removal from the rumen, each bag and its contents were rinsed with tap water and placed in a 0.1 N pepsin-hydrochloric acid solution for 2 h in an oven at 40°C. The solution was produced by dissolving 2 g of pepsin (Merck reference 1.07190.1000 with activity 2000FIP-U/g) in 1 litre of 0.1 N HCl. The seeds from the simulated ingestion experiment were used to determine germination percentage.

Recovery, mean retention time and germination

The total mass of dung pellets was weighed for each sheep at each time interval. A 100 g subsample of the pellets was manually crushed and then the number of seeds of each plant species was determined. The recovery percentage of the seeds (RPS) was estimated for each plant species using the following equation:

$$RPS = \,m_fs_r/100s$$

where m f is the total mass of dung defecated within each time interval, s r is the average number of seeds found in 100 g of pellet, and s is the number of seeds ingested by the sheep. The MRT of seeds in the digestive tract was calculated using the following equation:

$$MRT = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {m_it_i} /\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {m_i} $$

where m i is the number of seeds defecated at time t i after ingestion by the sheep.

The germination percentage of seeds from the simulated ingestion study was compared with that of non-ingested seeds. All seeds were disinfected by immersion in a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 2 min and then rinsed with sterile distilled water for 10 min. The seeds were placed on moist filter paper in 5-cm Petri dishes. Each Petri dish contained 25 seeds. There were four replicates per treatment. The incubations were conducted in controlled environment chambers with 16 h light at 25°C and 8 h of darkness at 15°C. The filter paper was remoistened with distilled water as necessary. The incubation conditions allow for the germination of a large range of plant species (Picard et al., Reference Picard, Papaïx, Gosselin, Picot, Bideau and Baltzinger2015). The dishes were examined daily. Seeds were considered to have germinated when the root was 1–2 mm long. Seeds that had germinated were counted and then removed from the dishes. The germination percentages in this paper are the average of the three incubation times (i.e. 22, 34 and 46 h).

Data analysis

Analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate differences among the plant species in seed recovery percentage and MRT. The data were tested for normality with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The Tukey test was used to verify significant differences among species. Pearson's correlation was used to test how seed recovery and seed germination percentage after ingestion were related to seed mass and seed shape. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A phylogenetic tree of the plant species was drawn with Phylomatic software version 3.0.

Results

The mass and dimensions of the rather elongated gramineous seeds were as follows (means of 13 species with ranges in parentheses): 100-seed mass, 0.26 g (0.01–0.79 g); length, 7.65 mm (1.04–14.03 mm); width, 0.91 mm (0.32–1.72 mm); thickness, 0.83 mm (0.33–1.54 mm); divergence from sphericity, 0.16 (0.09–0.19) (Table 1). In comparison, the rather rounded leguminous seeds had the following characteristics (means of four species with ranges in parentheses): 100-seed mass, 1.34 g (0.57–2.56 g); length, 3.04 mm (2.31–4.22 mm); width, 2.45 mm (1.99–3.16 mm); thickness, 1.93 mm (1.55–2.39 mm); divergence from sphericity, 0.02 (0.004–0.03) (Table 1).

There was a clear peak in the recovery of seeds of all plant species between 24 and 48 h after ingestion (Fig. 2). More than 80% of all recovered seeds were defecated during this period. No seeds were recovered from dung during the first 6 h after feeding. Seeds from three plant species (i.e. Dactylis glomerata, Agrostisis turkestanica and Melica transsilvanica) were still being recovered in dung 96 h after feeding.

Figure 2. Temporal changes in seed recovery after ingestion by Kazakh sheep. The data were fitted to a Gaussian model: y = 0.16 + 1.48e–2((x–35.42)/27.27)2, r 2 = 0.55, F(df 1 = 16, df 2 = 34) = 311.16, P < 0.0.

There were significant differences among plant species in the number of seeds recovered from sheep dung [F(df 1 = 16, df 2 = 34) = 1924.07, P < 0.01]. The recovery percentages of the four leguminous species (12.7–17.5%) were significantly greater than those of the 13 gramineous species (0.8–3.2%) (Table 2).

Table 2. Total recovery percentages and mean retention times of ingested seeds

Values are presented as means ± standard error (n = 3). Values within a column followed by a different letter are significantly different at P < 0.05.

The MRT of most species was between 30 and 39 h. There were significant differences in MRT among species [F(df 1 = 16, df 2 = 34) = 7.511, P < 0.05]. Achnatherum inebrians had the longest MRT (42.2 h), followed by D. glomerata (41.9 h) and B. inermis (40.7 h). Agropyron cristatum had the lowest MRT (27.3 h) (Table 2).

Simulated ingestion significantly affected seed germination percentage [Fig. 3; F(df 1 = 16, df 2 = 34) = 60403.38, P < 0.01]. The germination percentage of all 13 gramineous species was significantly less in the simulated ingestion treatment (3.18–10.12%) than in the non-ingested treatment (66.67–97.67%) [F(df 1 = 16, df 2 = 34) = 1052.1, P < 0.01]. Among the gramineous species, P. tenuiflora and H. bogdanii had the highest germination percentage after simulated ingestion, whereas A. cristatum had the lowest germination percentage. The germination percentage of all four leguminous species was significantly greater in the simulated ingestion treatment (22.55–70.22%) than in the non-ingested treatment (5.33–12.33%) [F(df 1 = 16, df 2 = 34) = 1595.16, P < 0.01]. The germination percentage of the leguminous species after simulated ingestion decreased in the order S. alopecuroides > L. pratensis > G. glabrae > V. tenuifolia (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. A: working phylogeny of the 17 plant species in this experiment. B: final seed germination percentage in the non-ingested and simulated ingestion treatments. Values are means ± SD.

Seed recovery percentage was positively and most significantly correlated with seed mass (r = 0.91, P < 0.01). Seed recovery percentage was significantly negatively correlated with seed shape (r = –0.71, P < 0.05). The germination percentages were negatively correlated with seed shape (r = –0.93, P < 0.01). Mean retention time was not significantly correlated with either seed mass (r = 0.18, P > 0.05) or seed shape (r = –0.44, P > 0.05).

Discussion

The distance and effectiveness of seed dispersal is determined by the combined effects of (i) seed retention time in the vector's digestive system, (ii) the spatial extent of its movements, and (iii) the ability of the seeds to germinate once released (Picard et al., Reference Picard, Papaïx, Gosselin, Picot, Bideau and Baltzinger2015). The present study indicated a clear peak in seed defecation between 24 and 48 h after ingestion. Previous studies have shown a similar time span with sheep (Manzano et al., Reference Manzano, Malo and Peco2005). Seed recovery percentages after ingestion ranged from 0.8 to 17.5%. Those percentages agreed with other studies involving small ruminants. For example, seed recovery percentages after ingestion were 0–28% (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Xu, Wang, Shang and Long2012) and 10.4–23.0% (Manzano et al., Reference Manzano, Malo and Peco2005) in sheep, 7.4–17.4% in goat (Robles et al., Reference Robles, Castro, González-Miras and Ramos2005) and 0.5–42.0% in fallow deer (Mouissie et al., Reference Mouissie, van der Veen, Veen and Van Diggelen2005a). A likely reason for the relatively low recovery percentage in these studies is that small digestive tracts increase the likelihood of seeds contacting the gut wall which damages the seed by abrasion (Razanamandranto et al., Reference Razanamandranto, Tigabu, Neya and Odén2004).

The MRT of seeds in the digestive tract of Kazakh sheep ranged between 27 and 42 h. In comparison, other researchers have reported MRT values of 41 to 66 h in sheep (Illius and Gordon, Reference Illius and Gordon1992; Cosyns et al., Reference Cosyns, Delporte, Lens and Hoffmann2005b). These values are greater than those of rabbit and equid species (30–31 h), roe deer (18–36 h), and red deer (3–36 h) (Picard et al., Reference Picard, Papaïx, Gosselin, Picot, Bideau and Baltzinger2015). The MRT of ingested seeds in this study varied depending on plant species; however, the results indicate that the time span was long enough to result in seed dispersal in the grassland. Under the traditional grazing system in the Tianshan Mountains, Kazakh sheep move freely in the grassland. A previous report indicated that free-grazing Kazakh sheep move about 7–10 km per day (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wang, Lu, Wen, Yin and Zhao2016). This distance is far less than the distance of 25–30 km per day that other authors have reported (Klein, Reference Klein1981; Manzano et al., Reference Manzano, Malo and Peco2005). Obviously, these distances are affected by grazing management.

Many studies have indicated that ingestion reduces hard-seededness, with a greater proportion of seeds capable of germinating after ingestion (Russi and Roberts, Reference Russi and Roberts1992; Malo and Suárez, Reference Malo and Suárez1996; Milotić and Hoffmann, Reference Milotić and Hoffmann2016). However, other researchers have reported that germination declined when soft-coated or non-dormant seeds were soaked in rumen fluid (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Xu, Wang, Shang and Long2012). Hard-seededness is a common feature and the main mechanism of seed dormancy in legumes. In our study, simulated ingestion increased the germinability of S. alopecuroides, V. tenuifolia, L. pratensis and G. glabrae. This indicated that digestion can break dormancy and promote germination of leguminous seed. In contrast, simulated ingestion reduced the germination percentage of seeds from all 13 gramineous species. One possibility is that these seeds were either soft-coated or non-dormant. It should be noted that the conditions in this experiment simulated the environment of one specific part of the digestive system (i.e. rumen). In fact, the chemical composition varies among different parts of the digestive systems, as enzyme activity and pH differ between the mouth, rumen, stomach and intestines. These factors could have significant effect on seed germinability.

The seed recovery percentages were too low to accurately determine the germination percentage of the ingested seeds in this study. Therefore, we had to simulate the effects of ingestion. The effects of mastication, however, should be overlooked. Some plant species have seeds with hard seed coats that cause physical dormancy. For those plant species (e.g. many species in the Leguminosae and Cistaceae families), physical damage caused by chewing might break the seed coat and enhance germination. In other cases chewing may damage seeds and reduce germinability (Milotić and Hoffmann, Reference Milotić and Hoffmann2016). Ruminants generally only chew enough to get the proper mixture of food and saliva to form a bolus and facilitate swallowing (Church, Reference Church and Church1976). It is unclear whether seeds are damaged more by mastication or by the harsh environment of the reticulorumen. Seed size is probably also a factor, because small seeds are more likely to escape mastication (Russi and Roberts, Reference Russi and Roberts1992; Gökbulak, Reference Gökbulak2006).

Bruun and Poschlod (Reference Bruun and Poschlod2006) and D'Hondt and Hoffmann (Reference D'Hondt and Hoffmann2011) observed no relationship between endozoochorous dispersal potential and seed characteristics such as mass, shape (roundness) and thickness. Nevertheless, Janzen (Reference Janzen1984) provided a good hypothesis of ecological interaction for seed dispersal through ingestion and defecation by large herbivores. According to Janzen (Reference Janzen1984), large and round seeds of Leguminosae are best adapted to endozoochory. Our results also showed that seed recovery percentage and germination percentage were both related to seed mass and seed shape. Large and round seeds (e.g. those of S. alopecuroides, V. tenuifolia, L. pratensis and G. glabrae) had high recovery and germination percentages, whereas small and long seeds (e.g. those of B. inermis and H. bogdanii) had low recovery and germination percentages. Conflicting ideas about the relationship between seed characteristics and seed dispersal potential may be due to differences in plant species. The MRT was not significantly correlated with either seed mass or seed shape. Similarly, Cosyns et al. (Reference Cosyns, Delporte, Lens and Hoffmann2005b) reported that MRT was not significantly correlated with seed germination, seed recovery, or seed characteristic. This may be the result of complex interplay between animal and plant species.

The above results imply that the grazing activities of Kazakh sheep may contribute to the gathering of plant seeds under traditional seasonal grazing in Xinjiang Province. This is especially true in autumn and winter, when most plants still retain seeds. These seeds are available for consumption by moving livestock. Although the cost of gut passage for dry-fruited species is undoubtedly high (Traveset et al., Reference Traveset, Verdú, Levey, Silva and Galetti2002), ingestion can be advantageous for plant establishment due to the potential benefits of long distance dispersal. The results presented in Table 2 and Fig. 3 indicate that seed recovery and germination percentages of leguminous species were both relatively high after ingestion by Kazakh sheep. The MRT, recovery percentage and germination percentage indicate potential for long distance seed dispersal. This dispersal capacity could increase the heterogeneity among plant communities under free-range conditions.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31360568; no. 31560659) and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (no. 20126518120004). The authors would like to thank Dr Hao Li for technical support with the ruminal and small intestinal fistula surgery. We wish to thank Dr William J. Gale for his suggestions and improvements to the language in this manuscript.

References

Adeli, A. and Chen, W.G. (2008) The suggestions about resources and utilizing of Hazakah sheep. Animal Husbandry in XinJiang 11, 3233.Google Scholar
Archer, S. and Pyke, D.A. (1991) Plant–animal interactions affecting plant establishment and persistence on revegetated rangeland. Journal of Range Management 44, 558565.Google Scholar
Baraza, E. and Valiente-Banuet, A. (2008) Seed dispersal by domestic goats in a semiarid thornscrub of Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 72, 19731976.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R.E. and Rode, L.M. (1991) Effect of ensiling and rumen digestion by cattle on weed seed viability. Weed Science 39, 104108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruun, H.H. and Poschlod, P. (2006) Why are small seeds dispersed through animal guts: large numbers or seed size per se? Oikos 113, 402411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, D.C. (1976) Ingestion and mastication of feed. In Church, D. C. (ed), Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants, vol. 1, Digestive Physiology, 2nd edition, pp. 4660. Corvallis, OR: O and B Books.Google Scholar
Cosyns, E. and Hoffmann, M. (2005) Horse dung germinable seed content in relation to plant species abundance, diet composition and seed characteristics. Basic and Applied Ecology 6, 1124.Google Scholar
Cosyns, E., Claerbout, S., Lamoot, I. and Hoffmann, M. (2005a) Endozoochorous seed dispersal by cattle and horse in a spatially heterogeneous landscape. Plant Ecology 178, 149162.Google Scholar
Cosyns, E., Delporte, A., Lens, L. and Hoffmann, M. (2005b) Germination success of temperate grassland species after passage through ungulate and rabbit guts. Journal of Ecology 93, 353361.Google Scholar
D'Hondt, B. and Hoffmann, M. (2011) A reassessment of the role of simple seed traits in mortality following herbivore ingestion. Plant Biology 13, 118124.Google Scholar
Doucette, K.M. and Mccaughey, W.P. (2001) Seed recovery and germination of reseeded species fed to cattle. Journal of Range Management 54, 575581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gökbulak, F. (2003) Effect of American bison (Bison bison L.) on the recovery and germinability of seeds of range forage species. Grass and Forage Science 57, 395400.Google Scholar
Gökbulak, F. (2006) Recovery and germination of grass seeds ingested by cattle. Journal of Biological Sciences 6, 2327.Google Scholar
Gökbulak, F. and Call, C.A. (2009) Grass seedling recruitment in cattle dungpats. Rangeland Ecology and Management 57, 649655.Google Scholar
Illius, A.W. and Gordon, I.J. (1992) Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions. Oecologia 89, 428434.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, H. (2010) Effects of ingestion of seeds by sika deer (Cervus nippon) and dung presence on their germination in a herbaceous community. Ecological Research 25, 591598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D.H. (1984) Dispersal of small seeds by big herbivores: foliage is the fruit. American Naturalist 123, 338353.Google Scholar
Jia, X.S. and Wang, A.F. (2013) The discussion on establishment of reproduction and breeding stystem in Kazak sheep. Grass-Feeding Livestock 1, 912.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1981) La Mesta (2nd edition). Madrid, Spain, Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Malo, J.E. and Suárez, F. (1996) Cistus ladanifer recruitment – not only fire, but also deer. Acta Oecologica 17, 5560.Google Scholar
Malo, J.E., Jiménez, B. and Suárez, F. (2000) Herbivore dunging and endozoochorous seed deposition in a Mediterranean dehesa. Journal of Range Management 53, 322328.Google Scholar
Mancilla-Leytón, J.M., Fernández-Alés, R. and Vicente, A.M. (2011) Plant-ungulate interaction: goat gut passage effect on survival and germination of Mediterranean shrub seeds. Journal of Vegetation Science 22, 10311037.Google Scholar
Manzano, P., Malo, J.E. and Peco, B. (2005) Sheep gut passage and survival of Mediterranean shrub seeds. Seed Science Research 15, 2128.Google Scholar
Milotić, T. and Hoffmann, M. (2016) How does gut passage impact endozoochorous seed dispersal success? Evidence from a gut environment simulation experiment. Basic and Applied Ecology 17, 165176.Google Scholar
Mouissie, A.M., van der Veen, C.E.J., Veen, G.F.C. and Van Diggelen, R. (2005a) Ecological correlates of seed survival after ingestion by fallow deer. Functional Ecology 19, 284290.Google Scholar
Mouissie, A.M., Vos, P., Verhagen, H.M.C. and Bakker, J.P. (2005b) Endozoochory by free-ranging, large herbivores: ecological correlates and perspectives for restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 6, 547558.Google Scholar
Nchanji, A.C. and Plumptre, A.J. (2003) Seed germination and early seedling establishment of some elephant-dispersed species, Banyang-Mbo wildlife Sanctuary, Southwest Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19, 229237.Google Scholar
Pakeman, R.J. (2001) Plant migration rates and seed dispersal mechanisms. Journal of Biogeography 28, 795800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peco, B., Lopez-Merino, L. and Alvir, M. (2006) Survival and germination of Mediterranean grassland species after simulated sheep ingestion: ecological correlates with seed traits. Acta Oecologica 30, 269275.Google Scholar
Picard, M., Papaïx, J., Gosselin, F., Picot, D., Bideau, E. and Baltzinger, C. (2015). Temporal dynamics of seed excretion by wild ungulates: implications for plant dispersal. Ecology and Evolution 5, 26212632.Google Scholar
Razanamandranto, S., Tigabu, M., Neya, S. and Odén, P.C. (2004) Effects of gut treatment on recovery and germinability of bovine and ovine ingested seeds of four woody species from the Sudanian savanna in West Africa. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 199, 389397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, A.B., Castro, J., González-Miras, E. and Ramos, M.E. (2005) Effects of ruminal incubation and goats’ ingestion on seed germination of two legume shrubs: Adenocarpus decorticans Boiss. and Retama sphaerocarpa (L.) Boiss. Options Méditerranéennes Série A Séminaires Méditerranéens 67, 111115.Google Scholar
Russi, L. and Roberts, E.H. (1992) The fate of legume seeds eaten by sheep from a Mediterranean grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology 29, 772778.Google Scholar
Simao, N.M. and Jones, R.M. (1987) Recovery of pasture seed ingested by ruminants. 2. Digestion of seed in sacco and in vitro . Animal Production Science 27, 247251.Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Band, S.R. and Hodgson, J.G. (1993) Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil. Functional Ecology 7, 236241.Google Scholar
Traveset, A., Bermejo., T. and Willson, M. (2001) Effect of manure composition on seedling emergence and growth of two common shrub species of Southeast Alaska. Plant Ecology 155, 2934.Google Scholar
Traveset, A., Verdú, M., Levey, D.J., Silva, W.R. and Galetti, M. (2002) A meta-analysis of the effect of gut treatment on seed germination. International Symposium – Workshop on Frugivores and Seed Dispersal 91, 334339.Google Scholar
Uytvanck, J.V., Milotić, T. and Hoffmann, M. (2010) Interaction between large herbivore activities, vegetation structure, and flooding affects tree seedling emergence. Plant Ecology 206, 173184.Google Scholar
Wang, C.J., Wang, W.Q., Lu, W.H., Wen, C.L., Yin, X.J. and Zhao, Q.Z. (2016) Feed intake distribution model for herd based on grazing spatio-temporal trajectory data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 32, 125130.Google Scholar
Warner, A.C.I. (1981) Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds. Nutrition Abstract and Review 51, 789820.Google Scholar
Woldu, Z. and Saleem, M.A.M. (2000) Grazing induced biodiversity in the highland ecozone of East Africa. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 79, 4352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, X.J., Xu, C.L., Wang, F., Shang, Z.H. and Long, R.J. (2012) Recovery and germinability of seeds ingested by yaks and Tibetan sheep could have important effects on the population dynamics of alpine meadow plants on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Rangeland Journal 34, 249255.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Selected characteristics (mass, length, width, thickness, shape) of the seeds of the perennial plant species used

Figure 1

Figure 1. The individual metabolic crates with a faeces collection system.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Temporal changes in seed recovery after ingestion by Kazakh sheep. The data were fitted to a Gaussian model: y = 0.16 + 1.48e–2((x–35.42)/27.27)2, r2 = 0.55, F(df1 = 16, df2 = 34) = 311.16, P < 0.0.

Figure 3

Table 2. Total recovery percentages and mean retention times of ingested seeds

Figure 4

Figure 3. A: working phylogeny of the 17 plant species in this experiment. B: final seed germination percentage in the non-ingested and simulated ingestion treatments. Values are means ± SD.