Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:23:37.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: Anthropology and citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2005

CATHERINE NEVEU
Affiliation:
LAIOS-CNRS, Paris catneveu@wanadoo.fr
Get access

Extract

As an anthropologist working on citizenship, I cannot but be delighted to see what has sometimes been perceived as an ‘illegitimate’ object for the discipline attracting growing interest. While in such matters, it is often difficult to distinguish clearly between different lines of arguments that are entangled in complex ways, I will try to organise my comments around two themes: a critical discussion of Nic Craith's approach to citizenship as being so much informed by a ‘culturalist’ approach to culture that it cannot avoid certain traps; and my proposals for an alternative way of discussing relationships between identities and citizenship from an anthropological perspective.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The following comments and rejoinder have been received in response to Máiréad Nic Craith's ‘Anthropology and citizenship in Europe’, published in Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale 12 (2004): 289–300.