Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T16:11:31.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A macroscope of English print culture, 1530–1700, applied to the coevolution of ideas on religion, science, and institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2024

Peter Grajzl
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, The Williams School of Commerce, Economics, and Politics, Washington and Lee University and CESifo, Munich, Germany
Peter Murrell*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
*
Corresponding author: Peter Murrell; Email: pmurrell@umd.edu

Abstract

We combine unsupervised machine learning and econometric methods to study England’s print culture in the pivotal sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Machine learning synthesizes the content of 57,863 texts comprising 83 million words into 110 topics. Topics include the expected, such as Natural Philosophy, and the unexpected, such as Baconian Theology. Timelines suggest that religious and political discourse gradually became less antagonistic and economic topics more prominent. The epistemology associated with Bacon was present in theological debates already before Bacon’s epistemological contributions. Vector autoregression estimates provide insight into the coevolution of ideas on religion, science, and institutions. Innovations in religious ideas stimulated focus on science, especially at times when Puritanism was prominent in religious discourse. Neither science nor institutional thought evidence secularization. The Glorious Revolution and the Civil War did not spur debates on institutions nor did the founding of the Royal Society markedly elevate attention to science.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A. (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York, NY: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Airoldi, Edoardo M., and Bischof, Jonathan M. (2016) “Improving and evaluating topic models and other models of text.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 111 (516): 1381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almelhem, Ali, Iyigun, Murat, Kennedy, Austin, and Rubin, Jared (2023) “Enlightenment ideals and belief in science in the run-up to the Industrial Revolution: A textual analysis.” Unpublished manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, John (2002) “Introduction,” in Barnard, John and McKenzie, Donald F. (eds.) with Maureen Bell, The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV, 1557–1695. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 1–26.Google Scholar
Barnard, John, and McKenzie, Donald F., eds. with Maureen Bell (2002) The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV, 1557–1695. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael H. (2000) Stages of Thought: The Co-Evolution of Religious Thought and Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Sascha O., and Woessmann, Ludger (2009) “Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of Protestant economic history.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2): 531–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Zeev, Nadav, Mokyr, Joel, and van der Beek, Karine (2017) “Flexible supply of apprenticeship in the British Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 77 (1): 208–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Ann, and von Greyerz, Kaspar (2020) “Introduction,” in Blair, Ann and von Greyerz, Kaspar (eds.) Physico-theology: Religion and Science in Europe, 1650–1750. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen, Campbell, Bruce M.S., Klein, Alexander, Overton, Mark, and van Leeuwen, Bas (2015) British Economic Growth, 1270–1870. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley (1990) “Science and religion,” in Olby, R.C., Cantor, G.N., Christie, J.R.R. and Hodge, M.J.S. (eds.) Companion to the History of Modern Science. New York, NY: Routledge: 763–82.Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Adam, Chen, Yao, Palma, Nuno, and Ward, Felix (2022) “The vagaries of the sea: Evidence on the real effects of money from maritime disasters in the Spanish empire.” Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkov, Andriy (2019) The Hundred-Page Machine Learning Book. Quebec City: Andriy Burkov.Google Scholar
Caldara, Dario, and Iacoviello, Matteo (2022) “Measuring geopolitical risk.” American Economic Review 112 (4): 1194–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calloway, Katherine (2015) Natural Theology in the Scientific Revolution: God’s Scientists. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence J., Eichenbaum, Martin, and Evans, Charles L. (1999) “Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end?” in Taylor, John B. and Woodford, Michael (eds.) Handbook of Macroeconomics. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 65148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard (1990) “Introduction: The impact of the Merton thesis,” in Bernard Cohen, I. (ed.) Puritanism and the Rise of Modern Science, The Merton Thesis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press: i-xiii.Google Scholar
Collinson, Patrick, Hunt, Arnold, and Walsham, Alexandra (2002) “Religious publishing in England 1557–1640,” in Barnard, John and McKenzie, Donald F. (eds.) with Maureen Bell, The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV, 1557–1695. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 29–66.Google Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas, and Mills, Terence C. (2017) “Six centuries of British economic growth: A time-series perspective.” European Review of Economic History 21 (2): 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Jeremiah, and Seabold, Skipper (2021) “New media and competition: Printing and Europe’s transformation after Gutenberg.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Erikson, Emily (2021) Trade and Nation: How Companies and Politics Reshaped Economic Thought. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennaro, Gloria, and Ash, Elliott (2022) “Emotion and reason in political language.” Economic Journal 132 (643): 1037–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Kelly, Bryan, and Taddy, Matt (2019) “Text as data.” Journal of Economic Literature 57 (3): 535–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, Peter, and Murrell, Peter (2019) “Toward Understanding 17th century English culture: A structural topic model of Francis Bacon’s ideas.” Journal of Comparative Economics 47 (1): 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, Peter, and Murrell, Peter (2021) “A machine-learning history of English caselaw and legal ideas prior to the Industrial Revolution I: Generating and interpreting the estimates.” Journal of Institutional Economics 17 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, Peter, and Murrell, Peter (2022) “A macrohistory of legal evolution and coevolution: Property, procedure, and contract in early-modern English caselaw.” International Review of Law and Economics 73: 106113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, Peter, and Murrell, Peter (2023) “Of families and inheritance: Law and development in England before the Industrial Revolution.” Cliometrica 17: 387432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Ian, and Peters, Kate (2002) “Religious publishing in England 1640–1695,” in Barnard, John and McKenzie, Donald F. (eds.) with Maureen Bell, The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV, 1557–1695. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 67–94.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Roberts, Margaret E., and Stewart, Brandon M. (2021) “Machine learning for social science: An agnostic approach.” Annual Review of Political Science 24: 395419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Roberts, Margaret E., and Stewart, Brandon M. (2022) Text as Data. A New Framework for Machine Learning and the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harkness, Deborah E. (2007) The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter (2008) “Religion, the Royal Society, and the rise of science.” Theology and Science 6 (3): 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriques, António, and Palma, Nuno (2023) “Comparative European institutions and the little divergence, 1385–1800.” Journal of Economic Growth 28: 259–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Christopher (1965) Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution Revisited. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2017) “1688 and all that: Property rights, the glorious revolution and the rise of British capitalism.” Journal of Institutional Economics 13 (1): 79107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holifield, E. Brooks (2003) Theology in America: Christian Thought from the Age of the Puritans to the Civil War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jalil, Andrew J. (2015) “A new history of banking panics in the United States, 1825–1929: Construction and implications.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7 (3): 295330.Google Scholar
Johns, Adrian (2002) “Science and the book,” in Barnard, John and McKenzie, Donald F. (eds.) with Maureen Bell, The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV, 1557–1695. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 274–303.Google Scholar
Jordà, Òscar, Singh, Sanjay R., and Taylor, Alan M. (2022) “Longer-run economic consequences of pandemics.” Review of Economics and Statistics 104 (1): 166–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Seán, Lennard, Jason, Turner, John D. (2021) “The macroeconomic effects of banking crises: Evidence from the United Kingdom, 1750–1938.” Explorations in Economic History 79 (C): 101357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2020.101357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, Lutz (1998) “Small-sample confidence intervals for impulse response functions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (2): 218–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, Lutz, and Lütkepohl, Helmut (2017) Structural Vector Autoregressive Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur (2010) The Long Divergence: How Islamic Law Held Back the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Moontae, and Mimno, David (2014) “Low-dimensional embeddings for interpretable anchor-based topic inference,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Doha, Qatar: ACL: 1319–28.Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael A., and Rockmore, Daniel N. (2019) Law as Data: Computation, Text, and the Future of Legal Analysis. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter (2017). Heretics and Believers: A History of the English Reformation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Julian (1992) Francis Bacon, the State, and the Reform of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacCulloch, Diarmaid (2004) The Reformation. New York, NY: Viking Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1938) “Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England.” Osiris 4: 360632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. (2016) Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel (2005) “The intellectual origins of modern economic growth.” Journal of Economic History 65 (2): 285351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel (2009) The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain 1700–1850. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel (2016) A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, Niels Framroze, and Sharp, Paul 2014. “Malthus in cointegration space: Evidence of a post-Malthusian pre-industrial England.” Journal of Economic Growth 19 (1): 105–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murrell, Peter (2017) “Design and evolution in institutional development: The insignificance of the English Bill of Rights.” Journal of Comparative Economics 45 (1): 3655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Emi, and Steinsson, Jón (2018) “Identification in macroeconomics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (3): 5986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R. (1989) “Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England.” Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallis, John J., and Weingast, Barry R. (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh, and Carus, A.W. (2014) “Institutions and economic growth in historical perspective,” in Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 403–513.Google Scholar
Palma, Nuno (2016) “Sailing away from Malthus: Intercontinental trade and European economic growth, 1500–1800.” Cliometrica 10: 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palma, Nuno (2022) “The real effects of monetary expansions: Evidence from a large-scale historical experiment.” Review of Economic Studies 89 (3): 1593–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plagborg-Møller, Mikkel, and Wolf, Christian K. (2021) “Local projections and VARs estimate the same impulse responses.” Econometrica 89 (2): 955–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Martin F. (1980) “An algorithm for suffix stripping.” Program 14 (3): 130–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy (2000) The Creation of the Modern World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Price, Bronwen (2017) “‘Finding the genuine light of nature’: Religion and science,” in Hiscock, Andrew and Wilcox, Helen (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern English Literature and Religion, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 579–97.Google Scholar
Quinn, Stephen, and Roberds, William (2019) “A policy framework for the Bank of Amsterdam, 1736–1791.” Journal of Economic History 79 (3): 736–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabb, Theodore K. (1965) “Religion and the rise of modern science.” Past & Present 31: 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, Valerie (2016) “Macroeconomic shocks and their propagation,” in Taylor, John B. and Uhlig, Harald (eds.) Handbook of Macroeconomics. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 71–162.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., and Airoldi, Edoardo M. (2016a) “A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 111 (515): 9881003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., and Tingley, Dustin (2016b) “Navigating the local modes of big data: The case of topic models,” in Michael Alvarez, R. (ed.) Computational Social Science, Discovery and Prediction, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press: 51–97.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., and Tingley, Dustin (2019) “stm: R package for structural topic models.” Journal of Statistical Software 91 (2): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., Dustin Tingley, Christopher Lucas, Jetson Leder-Luis, Shana Kushner Gadarian, Albertson, Bethany, and Rand, David G. (2014) “Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1064–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Jared (2017) Rulers, Religion, and Riches: Why the West Got Rich and the Middle East Did Not. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven (1988) “Understanding the Merton thesis.” Isis 79 (4): 594605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven (1996) The Scientific Revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J. (2000). A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sims, Christopher A. (1980) “Macroeconomics and reality.” Econometrica 48 (1): 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, James H., and Watson, Mark W. (2001) “Vector autoregressions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4): 101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taddy, Matthew A. (2012) “On estimation and selection for topic models,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. La Palma, Canary Islands: JMLR WCP: 1184–93.Google Scholar
The Text Creation Partnership [TCP] (2022), textcreationpartnership.org (accessed February 27, 2024).Google Scholar
Wallach, Hanna M., Murray, Iain, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, and Mimno, David (2009) “Evaluation methods for topic models,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. Montreal, Canada: ACM: 1105–12.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongbin, Jianxiong Wang, Yafei Zhang, Wang, Meng, and Mao, Cunli (2019) “Optimization of topic recognition model for news texts based on LDA.” Journal of Digital Information Management 17 (5): 257–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, Charles (1974) “Introduction,” in Charles Webster (ed.) The Intellectual Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 1–22.Google Scholar
Weston, Sara J., Ian Shryock, Ryan Light, and Fisher, Phillip A. (2023) “Selecting the number and labels of topics in topic modeling: A tutorial.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 6 (2): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, David (2015) The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution. New York, NY: Harper. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Grajzl and Murrell supplementary material

Grajzl and Murrell supplementary material
Download Grajzl and Murrell supplementary material(File)
File 807.2 KB