Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:00:47.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rise of Corporatist Regulation in the English and Canadian Dairy Industries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Roy C. Barnes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article answers Larry Gerber's (1995) challenge for a renewed appreciation of the social science literature on corporatism and state theory by explaining variations in corporatist institutions through the concept of policy legacies. To understand the variation in corporatist forms of governance, three policy areas are key: the long-standing trade policies of the England and Canada, the forms of government intervention during World War I, and prior political battles within the dairy industries. In their own unique way, these policies shaped the character of the market failure, the political capacities of farm organizations, and the institutional response that incorporated private interest groups within the formulation and implementation of public policy. By viewing the emergence of corporatist institutions in England and Canada as examples of governmental responses to economic crisis, this research on corporatism contributes to the larger theory of the determinants, as well as the effects, of the state in capitalist democracies.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Fall 2001 , pp. 381 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Gazette (1917) “The Dairy and Cold Storage Branch: The Cheese Commission.” 4: 754–55.Google Scholar
Agricultural Gazette (1918a) “The Dairy and Cold Storage Branch: The Dairy Produce Commission.” 5: 562.Google Scholar
Agricultural Gazette (1918b) “The Dairy and Cold Storage Branch: Cargo inspection at British ports.” 5: 666–68.Google Scholar
Ankli, R. E. (1992) “Ontario's dairy industry, 1820–1920,” in Akenson, D. H. (ed.) Canadian Papers in Rural History, vol. 8. Gananoque, Ont.: Langdale Press: 261–75.Google Scholar
Board of Agriculture and Fisheries (1906) Agricultural Statistics, 1905: Report on the Agricultural Returns Relating to Acreage and Produce of Crops and Numbers of Live Stock in Great Britain. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Brenner, M. J. (1969) “Functional representation of interest group theory.” Comparative Politics 2: 111–34.Google Scholar
Brethour, C. L. (1968) 64 Years of History: The Hamilton Milk Producers' Association 1903–1967. Hamilton, Ont.: Hamilton Milk Producers' Association.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. R., and Shefrin, F. (1952) Federal Agricultural Assistance Programs Canada, 1900–1950. Department of Agriculture, Economics Division, Marketing Service. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Board of Commerce (1920) “Annual report of the Board of Commerce, May 31, 1920.” Sessional Papers, no. 205, RG-14, D 2, vol. 74.Google Scholar
Canada. Census and Statistics Office (1914) Fifth Census of Agriculture, 1911, vol.4.Google Scholar
Canada. Census Office (1901) Fourth Census of Canada, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Agriculture (1975) Publications of the Canada Department of Agriculture:1867–1974. 2nd revised edition. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Labour (1917a) “Report of the Acting Commissioner, W. F. O’Connor, K.C., re Cost of Living—Cold Storage in Canada.” Sessional Papers, no.210a. Ottawa: J. De L. TachGoogle Scholar
Canada. Department of Labour (1917b) Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Investigate the Businesses of William Daivis Co., Ltd. and Mathews-Blackwell, Ltd. Ottawa: J. De L. TachGoogle Scholar
Canada. Food Board (1919) “Report of the Canada Food Board, February 11-December 31, 1918.” Sessional Papers, no. 60, RG–14, D 2, vol. 42.Google Scholar
Canada. House of Commons (1921) Debates, 19 May.Google Scholar
Canada. Ministry of Agriculture (1947) Report of the Ontario Royal Commission on Milk. Toronto: Baptist Johnston.Google Scholar
Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Official Report of Debates of the House of Commons, 5th Session, 13th Parliament, Volume 4, pages 3604–5.Google Scholar
Cawson, A. (1986) Corporatism and Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Backwell.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. H., and Brethour, C. L. (1966a). The Ontario Whole Milk Producers’ League, 1932–1966. Toronto: Ontario Whole Milk Producers' League.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. H., and Brethour, C. L. (1966b) A History of the Toronto Milk Producers’ Association, 1900 to 1966. Toronto: Toronto Milk Producers'Association.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. D. (1987) “Agricultural policy and the Associations of the Food Processing Industry,” in Grant, W. (ed.) Business Interests, Organizational Development and Private Interest Government. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 151–65.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. D., and Grant, W. (1984) “Business associations and public policy: A comparison of organizational development in Britain and Canada.” Journal of Public Policy 4: 209–35.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. D., and Grant, W. (1985) “Regional differentiation of business interest associations: A comparison of Canada and the United Kingdom.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 18: 3–29.Google Scholar
Cox, G., Lowe, P., and Winter, M. (1990a) “The political management of the dairy sector in England and Wales,” in Marsden, T. and Little, J. (eds.) Perspectives on the Food System. Aldershot: Avebury: 82–111.Google Scholar
Cox, G., Lowe, P., and Winter, M. (1990b) “Agricultural regulation and the politics of milk production,” in Crouch, C. and Dore, R. (eds.) Corporatism and Accountability: Organized Interests in British Public Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 169–98.Google Scholar
Crepaz, M. M. L. (1992) “Corporatism in decline: An empirical-analysis of the impact of corporatism on macroeconomic performance and industrial disputes in 18 industrialized democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 25: 139–68.Google Scholar
Cutforth, A. E. (1936) Milk: Report of the Reorganization Commission for Great Britain. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Economic Series, no. 44. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. W. (1990) The Power Elite and the State: How Policy Is Made in America. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. W. (1996) State Autonomy or Class Dominance:Case Studies on Policy Making in America. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, W.T., and Aitken, H. G. J.. (1956) Canadian Economic History. Toronto: Macmillian.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1985) Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farago, P. (1985) “Regulating milk markets: Corporatist arrangements in the Swiss dairy industry,” in Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.) Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London: Sage: 168–81.Google Scholar
Forrester, R. B. (1927) The Fluid Milk Market in England and Wales. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Economic Series, no. 16. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Fowke, V. C. (1946) Canadian Agricultural Policy: The Historical Pattern. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, L. G. (1995) “Corporatism and state theory.” Social Science History 19: 313–32.Google Scholar
Giddings, A. (1974) Marketing Boards and Ministers: A Study of Agricultural Marketing Boards as Political and Administrative Instruments. Westmead, Eng.: Saxon House.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J., and Howe, C. (1991) “Beyond ‘state vs. society’: Theories of the state and New Deal agricultural policies.” American Sociological Review 56: 204–20.Google Scholar
Goldfield, M. (1989) “Worker insurgency, radical organization, and New Deal labor legislation.” American Political Science Review 83: 1257–82.Google Scholar
Goldfield, M. (1990) “Explaining New Deal labor policy.” American Political Science Review 84: 1304–15.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1985a) “Private organizations as agents of public policy: The case of milk marketing in Britain,” in Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.) in Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London: Sage: 182–96.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1985b) “Corporatism and the public-private distinction,” in Lane, J. E. (ed.) The Politics of the Public and the Private. London: Sage: 159–80.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1989) Government and Industry: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S., Canada and the U.K. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1991) The Dairy Industry: An International Comparison. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Grigg, E. (1933) Report of the Reorganization Commission for Milk. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Economic Series, no. 38. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Heick, W. H. (1991) A Propensity to Protect: Butter, Margarine, and the Rise of Urban Culture in Canada. Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. (1988) “Social democratic corporatism and economic growth.” Journal of Politics 50: 677–704.Google Scholar
Hicks, A., and Patterson, W. D. (1989) “On the robustness of the left corporatist model of economic-growth.” Journal of Politics 51: 662–75.Google Scholar
Innis, H. A. (1930) The Fur Trade in Canada: An Introduction to Canadian Economic History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Innis, H. A. (1934) “An introduction to the economic history of Ontario from outpost to empire.” Ontario Historical Society, Papers and Records 30: 111–23.Google Scholar
Innis, H. A. (1937) “Historical Background,” in Innis, H. A. (ed.) The Dairy Industry in Canada. Toronto: Ryerson Press: 1–11.Google Scholar
Innis, M. Q., ed. (1956) Essays in Canadian Economic History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, A. (1970) Drinka Pinta: The Story of Milk and the Industry that Serves It. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Labour Gazette (1920a) “Prices in Canada during 1919: A review of the movement, with tabular statements.” 20: 87–92.Google Scholar
Labour Gazette (1920b) “The Board of Commerce of Canada: Statements issued as to policy of the board.” 20: 97–102.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1984) “Concertation and the structure of corporatist networks,” in Goldthorpe, J. H.(ed.) Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 60–80.Google Scholar
London County Council (1939) London Statistics,1936-38. Westminster, London: S. King and Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
MacPherson, I. (1990) “Creating stability amid degrees of marginality: Divisions in the struggle for orderly marketing in British Columbia, 1900–1940,” in Akenson, D. H. (ed.) Canadian Papers in Rural History, vol. 8. Gananoque Ontario: Langdale Press: 309–33.Google Scholar
Marr, W. L., and Paterson, D. G. (1980). Canada: An Economic History. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1963) [1926] The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
McCormick, V. (1968) A Hundred Years in the Dairy Industry. Ottawa: Dairy Farmers of Canada.Google Scholar
Milk Control Board of Ontario (1946) “Record of licenses in the markets of Toronto, Hamilton, Windsor,Ottawa, Kirkland Lake, Timmins and comments thereon.” Archives of Ontario, RG 16, vol. 164, box 2.Google Scholar
Morgan, B. (1964) Express Journey, 1864-1964: A Centenary History of the Express Dairy Company Limited. London: Newman Neame Limited.Google Scholar
Nadeau, J. P. (1942) “Milk control in Canada.” Journal of Farm Economics 24: 333–36.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (1993) The Politics of Pensions:A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States,1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S., and Parker, E. (1990) “Business and social policy in Canada and the United States, 1920–1940.” Comparative Social Research 12: 295–339.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S., and Skocpol, T. (1984) “Why not equal protection? Explaining the politics of public social spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880’s–1920.” American Sociological Review 49: 726–50.Google Scholar
Parlby, G. B. (1965) Control of Fluid Milk Prices in Western Canada, 1932-1963: An Economic Analysis. Alberta Department of Agriculture, Farm Economics Branch.Google Scholar
Pohjola, M. (1992) “Corporatism and wage bargaining,” in Pekkarinen, J., Pohkjoka, M., and Rowthorn, B., (eds.) Societal Corporatism: A Superior Economic System? Oxford: Clarendon Press: 44–81.Google Scholar
Poole, M. (1982) “Some problems of method and operational techniques in the study of corporatism.” European Journal of Political Research 10: 255–63.Google Scholar
Pryor, F. L. (1988) “Corporatism as an economic system: A review essay.” Journal of Comparative Economics 12: 317–44.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, J. A. (1911) “An historical and descriptive account of the dairying industry in Canada.” Bulletin of the Dairy and Cold Storage Branch, no. 28. Canada Department of Agriculture, Dairy Division. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Ruddick, J. A. (1917) Letter, 14 November 1917, to the Deputy Minister, Department of Agriculture. National Archives of Canada, RG-17, vol. 2799, file 255624.Google Scholar
Ruddick, J. A. (1919) “The Dairy and Cold Storage Branch:Cold storage facilities in Canada.” Agricultural Gazette 6: 722–24.Google Scholar
Ruddick, J. A. (1937) “The development of the dairy industry in Canada,” in Innis, H. A. (ed.) The Dairy Industry in Canada. Toronto: Ryerson Press: 13–123.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1974) “Still the century of corporatism?” Review of Politics 36: 85–131.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1981) “Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America,” in Berger, S. (ed.) Organizing Interests in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 285–327.Google Scholar
Self, P., and Storing, H. J. (1962) The State and the Farmer. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Singleton, J. F. (1921) “Dairy refrigerator car service and cargo inspection.” Agricultural Gazette 8: 305–7.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1985) “Bringing the state back in: Current research.” in Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3–37.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., and Finegold, K. (1982) “State capacity and economic intervention in the early New Deal.” Political Science Quarterly 97: 255–78.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., and Finegold, K. (1990) “Explaining New Deal labor policy.” American Political Science Review 84: 1297–304.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., and Schmitter, P. C. (1985) Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Strutt, E. G. 1923. “Evidence provided before the Linlithgow Committee’s Investigation into the Distribution and Prices of Agricultural Produce.” Public Record Office, Kew, MAF 34/62, document 191.Google Scholar
Traxler, F. (1985) “Prerequisites, problem-solving capacity and limits of neo-corporatist regulation,” in Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.) Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London: Sage: 150–67.Google Scholar
Traxler, F. (1990) “Political exchange, collective action, and interest governance: Towards a theory of the genesis of industrial relations and corporatism,” in Marin, B. (ed.) Governance and Generalized Exchange: Self-Organizing Policy Networks in Action. Boulder, Colo.: Westview: 39–67.Google Scholar
U.K. Board of Trade (1913) Final Report of the First Census of Production for the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U. K.Board of Trade (1920) Profiteering Acts, 1919 and 1920. Report on Milk. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Customs and Excise Department (various years) Annual Statement of the Trade of the United Kingdom with Foreign Countries and British Possessions. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Parliamentary Debates, Commons, 5th ser., vols. 98 and 103(1917–18).Google Scholar
U.K. Milk Marketing Board (1938) Milk Marketing Scheme: Five Years’ Review, 1933–1938. London: Milk Marketing Board.Google Scholar
U.K. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1924) Interim and Final Reports of the Department Committee on Distribution and Prices of Agricultural Produce, the Linlithgow Committee, Cmd. 2008. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1936) Report of the Committee of Investigation for England on Complaints Made by the Central Milk Distributive Committee and the Parliamentary Committee of the Co-operative Congress as to the Operation of the Milk Marketing Scheme, 1933. The Whitehead Committee. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
U.K. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1947) Report of the Committee Appointed to Review the Workings of the Agricultural Marketing Acts. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Economic Series, no. 48. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
van Waarden, F. (1985) “Varieties of collective self-regulation of business: The example of the Dutch dairy industry,” in Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.) Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London: Sage: 197–220.Google Scholar
von Beyme, K. (1983) “Neo-corporatism: A new nut in an old shell?” International Political Science Review 4 : 173–96.Google Scholar
Weir, M. (1987) “Full employment as a political issue in the United States.” Social Research 54: 377–402.Google Scholar
Weir, M. (1992) “Innovation and Boundaries in American Employment Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 107: 249–69.Google Scholar
Weir, M., Orloff, A. S., and Skocpol, T. (1988) The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whetham, E. H. (1964) “The London milk trade, 1860-1900.” Economic History Review, 2d ser.,17: 369–80.Google Scholar
Whetham, E. H. (1976) “The London milk trade,1900–1930,” in Oddy, D. and Miller, D. (eds.) The Making of the Modern British Diet. London: Croom Helm: 65–76.Google Scholar
Williamson, P. J. (1985) Corporatism in Perspective: An Introductory Guide to Corporatist Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar