Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:12:17.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The classification of Oceanic languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

John Bowden
John Bowden*
Affiliation:
, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Postbus 310, 6500-AH Nijmegen, THE NETHERLANDS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper surveys the literature regarding the linguistic subgrouping and historical affiliations of languages within the Oceanic subgroup of the Austronesian language family. It provides an overview of the evidence for the Oceanic subgroup and its external affiliations, as well as an overview of the internal relationships between languages of the family. It explores questions that have been settled to the satisfaction of most people working within the field, and identifies outstanding issues still of importance to practitioners in the area. A final section discusses a range of literature which surveys aspects of Oceanic linguistics apart from its subgrouping.

Type
Part I. Historical Perspectives
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Asia-Pacific Language Research , 1999 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, Australia 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bender, B.W. (1971). Micronesian languages. In Sebeok, T.A. (Ed.), Linguistics in Oceania. Current Trends in Linguistics (8), 426–465. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bender, B.W., & Wang, J.W. (1985). The status of Proto-Micronesian. In Pawley, A. & Carrington, L. (Eds.), Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (Pacific Linguistics C-88), 53–92. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Biggs, B. (1965). Direct and indirect inheritance in Rotuman. Lingua, 383–415.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1970). Proto-Austronesian Addenda. Oceanic Linguistics, 9, 104–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1971). Proto-Austronesian Addenda. Working Papers in Linguistics of the University of Hawaii, 3, 1–10.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1972a). Proto-Oceanic addenda with cognates in non-Oceanic Austronesian languages: a preliminary list. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 1–43.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1972b). Additions to proto-Austronesian addenda and Proto-Oceanic addenda with addenda with cognates in non-Oceanic Austronesian languages: a preliminary list. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 1–17.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1973). Additions to proto-Austronesian addenda and Proto-Oceanic addenda with addenda with cognates in non-Oceanic Austronesian languages: a preliminary list. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 33–61.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1978a). Eastern Malayo-Polynesian: a subgrouping argument. In Wurm, S.A. & Carrington, L. (Eds.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings, fascicle I. Western Austronesian (Pacific Linguistics C-61). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1978b). The Proto-Oceanic Palatals. Memoirs of the Polynesian Society. Wellington: The Polynesian Society.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1980). Austronesian Etymologies. Oceanic Linguistics, 19, 1–181.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1983–1984). Austronesian Etymologies II. Oceanic Linguistics, 22–23, 29–149.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1984). More on the position of the languages of eastern Indonesia. Oceanic Linguistics, 22–23, 1–28.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1986). Austronesian Etymologies III. Oceanic Linguistics, 25, 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1987). Lexical reconstruction and semantic reconstruction: the case of Austronesian house words. Diachronica, IV, 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1989). Austronesian Etymologies IV. Oceanic Linguistics, 28, 111–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1993). Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics, 32, 241–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blust, R.A. (1998). A note on higher-order subgroups in Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics, 37, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capell, A., (1943). The Linguistic Position of South- Eastern Papua. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Capell, A. (1971). The Austronesian languages of Australian New Guinea. In Sebeok, T.A. (Ed.), Linguistics in Oceania. Current Trends in Linguistics (8), 240–340. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Capell, A. (1976). General picture of Austronesian languages, New Guinea area. In Wurm, S.A. (Ed.), New Guinea Area Languages and Language Study, Vol. 2: Austronesian Languages (Pacific Linguistics C- 38), 5–52. Canberra, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Charpentier, J. (1982). Atlas Linguistique du Sud-Malakula. Langues et Cultures du Pacifique (2). Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Clark, R., (1973). Transitivity and case in Eastern Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics, 12, 559–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R., (1976). Aspects of Proto- Polynesian Syntax. Te Reo Monographs. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Clark, R. (1985). Languages of north and central Vanuatu: groups, chains, clusters and waves. In Pawley, A., & Canington, L. (Eds), Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (Pacific Linguistics C-88), 199–236. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Codrington, R. (1885). The Melanesian Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dempwolff, O. (1934). Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes. 1. Band: Induktiver Aufbau einer indonesischen Ursprache. Beihefte zur ZES (15). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Dempwolff, O. (1937). Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes. 2. Band: Deduktive Anwendung des Urindonesischen aufaustronesische Einzekprachen. Beihefte zur ZES (17). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Dempwolff, O., (1938). Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes. 3. Band: Austronesisches Wörterverzeichnis. Beihefte zur ZES. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Dyen, I. (1965). A lexicostatistical classification of the Austronesian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics Memoir, 19.Google Scholar
Dyen, I. (1978). The position of the languages of eastern Indonesia. In, Wurm, S.A., & Carrington, L. (Eds.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings, fascicle I. Western Austronesian (Pacific Linguistics C-61), 234–254. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Geraghty, P. (1983). The History of the Fijian Languages. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication No. 19. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Geraghty, P. (1986). The sound-system of Proto-Central-Pacific. In Geraghty, P.A., Carrington, L., & Wurm, S. (Eds), Focal II: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. (Pacific Linguistics C-94), 289–312. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Geraghty, P. (1989). The Reconstruction of Proto-Southern Oceanic. In Harlow, R., & Hooper, R. (Eds.), VICAL 1 - Oceanic Languages: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 141–156. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Grace, G. (1955). Subgrouping of Malayo-Polynesian: a report of the tentative findings. American Anthropologist, 57, 337–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, G. (1959). The position of the Polynesian languages within the Austronesian (Malayo-Polynesian) Language Family. IJAL Memoir 16.Google Scholar
Grace, G. (1969). A Proto-Oceanic finderlist. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics, 1/2, 39–84.Google Scholar
Grace, G. (1971). Notes on the phonological history of the Austronesian languages of the Sarmi Coast. Oceanic Linguistics, 10, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, G. (1976). Review of Pawley (1972). Journal of the Polynesian Society, 103–112.Google Scholar
Grace, G. (1981). Indirect inheritance and the aberrant Melanesian languages. In Hollyman, J., & Pawley, A. (Eds.), Studies in Pacific Languages & Cultures in Honour of Bruce Biggs, 255–268. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Grace, G. (1985). Oceanic subgrouping: retrospect and prospect. In Pawley, A., & Carrington, L. (Eds,), Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (Pacific Linguistics C-88), 1–18. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Grace, G. (1996). Regularity of change in what? In Durie, Mark and Ross, Malcolm (Eds) The comparative method reviewed, 157–179. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimes, B. (1996). Ethnologue. 13th edition. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Grimes, C. (1991). Central-Malayo-Polynesian: a critical evaluation. Paper presented at 6ICAL, the Sixth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Jackson, F.H. (1983). The internal and external relationships of the Trukic languages of Micronesia. PhD dissertation: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kern, H. (1906). Taalvergelijkende Verhandeling over het Aneityumsch met een Aanhangsel over het Klankstelsel van het Eromanga. Amsterdam: Muller.Google Scholar
Leenhardt, M. (1930). Notes dEthnologie Néo-Calédonienne. Travaux et Mémoires de lInstitut dEthnologie (8). Paris: Institut dEthnologie.Google Scholar
Leenhardt, M. (1946). Langues et Dialectes de lAustromélanésie. Paris: Institut dEthnologie.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, F. (1985). Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and in Proto- Oceanic. In Pawley, A., & Carrington, L. (Eds.), Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (Pacific Linguistics C- 88), 93–140. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, F. (1986). Syntactic-category change in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 24, 1–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, F. (1988). The Cristobal- Malaitan subgroup of southeast Solomonic. Oceanic Linguistics, 27, 24–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. (1978). Proto-south Hebridean and Proto- Oceanic. In Wurm, S.A., & Carrington, L. (Eds.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings, Fascicle 2 (Pacific Linguistics C- 61), 717–779. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. (1983). Studies in the Languages of Erromanga (Pacific Linguistics C- 79). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lynch, J., & Tryon, D. (1985). Central-Eastern Oceanic: a subgrouping hypothesis. In Pawley, A., & Carrington, L. (Eds.), Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (Pacific Linguistics C-88), 31–52. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Marek, J.C. (1975). The origins and dispersal of the Proto Nuclear Micronesians. MA Thesis: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Marek, J.C. (1996). A revision of the standard subgrouping of Polynesian languages and its cuture history implications. In Blench, R., & Spriggs, M. (Eds.), Archaeology and Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milke, W. (1965). Comparative Notes on the Austronesian Languages of New Guinea. Lingua, 330–348.Google Scholar
Milke, W. (1968). Proto-Oceanic addenda. Oceanic Linguistics, 7, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nothofer, B. (1992). CEMP and CMP - two Austronesian subgroups? A critical evaluation of Blust (1990) and Grimes (1991). Paper presented to the Second International Maluku Studies Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 07 30- August 2, 1992.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (1966). Polynesian languages: A subgrouping based on shared innovations in morphology. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 39–64.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (1972). On the internal relationships of eastern Oceanic languages. In Green, R.C. & Kelly, M. (Eds), Studies in Oceanic Culture History, Vol. 3. Pacific Anthropological Records No. 13, 3–106. Honolulu: Bernice P. Bishop Museum.Google Scholar
Pawley, A (1973). Some problems in Proto-Oceanic grammar. Oceanic Linguistics, 12, 103–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. (1975). The relationships of the Austronesian languages of Central Papua: A preliminary study. In Dutton, T.E. (Ed.), Studies in Languages of Central and South-East Papua (Pacific Linguistics C- 29), 3–105. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (1977). On Redefining Eastern Oceanic. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (1978). The New Guinea Oceanic hypothesis. Kivung: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea, 11, 99–151.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (1979). New evidence on the position of Rotuman. University of Auckland Working Papers in Anthropology, Archaeology, Linguistics and Maori Studies (52).Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (1981). Melanesian diversity and Polynesian homogeneity: a unified explanation for language. In Hollyman, J., & Pawley, A. (Eds). Studies in Pacific Languages and Cultures in Honour of Bruce Biggs. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (1982). Rubbish- man commoner, big man chief? Linguistic evidence for hereditary chieftainship in Proto-Oceanic. In Siikala, J. (Ed.), Oceanic Studies: Essays in Honour of Aarne A. Koskinen. Suomen Antropologinen Seura, 33- 52. Helsinki: The Finnish Anthropological Society.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Green, K. (1971). Lexical evidence for the Proto-Polynesian homeland. Te Reo, 14, 1–36.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Green, R. (1984). The Proto-Oceanic language community. In Kirk, R., & Szathmary, E. (Eds), Out of Asia: Peopling the Americas and the Pacific. Canberra: The Journal of Pacific History.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Ross, M. (1993). Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Ross, M. (1994). Austronesian Terminologies: continuity and change. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, C-127.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Ross, M. (1995). The prehistory of the Ocxeanic languages: a current view. In Bellwood, P., Fox, J., & Tryon, D. (Eds.) The Austronesians: hiostorical and comparative perspectives, 39–74. Canberra: Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ray, S. (1926). A Comparative Study of the Melanesian Island Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rehg, K. (1995). The significance of Linguistic Interaction Spheres in Reconstructing Micronesian Prehistory. Oceanic Linguistics, 34, 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. (1986). Towards a classification of the Oceanic languages of Bougainville and the western Solomons. In Geraghty, P., Carrington, L., & Wurm, S.A. (Eds.), FOCAL II: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (Pacific Linguistics C-94), 175–200. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ross, M. (1988). Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian Languages of Western Melanesia (Pacific Linguistics C-98). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ross, M. (1989). Proto-Oceanic consonant grade and Milkes *nj. In, Harlow, Ray, and Hooper, Robin, eds. VICAL 1 Oceanic Languages: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 433–496. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Ross, M. (1995). Proto-Oceanic Terms for Meteorological Phenomena. Oceanic Linguistics, 34, 261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm, (1996). On the genetic affiliation of the Oceanic languages of Irian Jaya. Oceanic Linguistics, 35, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, T. (1971). Linguistics in Oceania. Current Trends in Linguistics (8). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tryon, D.T. (1976). New Hebrides Languages: An Internal Classification (Pacific Linguistics C- 50). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Tryon, D.T. (1995). Comparative Austronesian Dictionary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryon, D.T., & Hackman, B.D. (1983). Solomon Islands Languages: an Internal Classification (Pacific Linguistics C- 72). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Walsh, D.S., & Biggs, B. (1966). Proto-Polynesian Word List 1 (Te Reo Monographs). Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Walter, R. (1989). Lapita fishing strategies: a review of the archaeological and linguistic evidence. Journal of Pacific Studies, 13, 127–149.Google Scholar
Wurm, S.A. (1976). New Guinea area languages and language study, Vol. 2. Austronesian Languages. (Pacific Linguistics C-39). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wurm, S.A., & Hattori, S. (1981). Language atlas of the Pacific area. (Pacific Linguistics C-66, C-67). Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities in collaboration with the Japan Academy.Google Scholar
Wurm, S.A., & Wilson, B. (1975). English Finderlist of Reconstructions in Austronesian Languages (Post- Brandstetter) (Pacific Linguistics C- 33). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar