Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:34:57.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aggressors and Victims in Bullying and Cyberbullying: A Study of Personality Profiles using the Five-Factor Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2017

Cristina Alonso  and
Estrella Romero
Cristina Alonso*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (Spain)
Estrella Romero
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addresssed to Cristina Alonso. Departamento de Psicobiología Psicología Clínica de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Santiago de Compostela (Spain). E-mail: cristina.alonso.vilar@usc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bullying and cyberbullying are highly prevalent in today’s society. However, the personality profiles of different roles involved in this phenomenon remain little known. This study aims (1) to examine the association between bullying and cyberbullying in adolescents; and (2) to analyze the relationship between bullying and cyberbullying in terms of the domains and facets of the five-factor model (FFM). A total of 910 adolescents aged 12 to 19 years old participated. They were administered self-report assessments of aggression and victimization in bullying and cyberbullying, as well as the JS-NEO-S questionnaire. The results provide evidence of co-occurrence between bullying and cyberbullying (p < .001). We observed higher neuroticism in victims and aggressor-victims, higher openness in victims, higher agreeableness in victims and non-aggressor non-victims and higher conscientiousness in non-aggressor non-victims as compared with the rest of the groups (p < .001). Comparison of the four cyberbullying groups showed that cybervictims score higher in neuroticism and openness, cybervictims and non-cybervictims non-cyberaggressors score higher in agreeableness and non-cybervictims non-cyberaggressors score higher in conscientiousness (p < .001) In conclusion, this study provides a broad, systematic view of the personality traits associated with different roles implicated in traditional bullying and cyberbullying.

Keywords

adolescentsbullyingcyberbullyingfive-factor model of personality
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 20 , 2017 , E76
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article:

Alonso, C., & Romero, E. (2017). Aggressors and victims in bullying and cyberbullying: A study of personality profiles using the five-factor model. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20. e76. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2017.73

References

Ak, S., Özdemir, Y., & Kuzucu, Y. (2015). Cybervictimization and cyberbullying: The mediating role of anger, don’t anger me! Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albores-Gallo, L., Sauceda-García, J., Ruiz-Velasco, S., & Roque-Santiago, E. (2011). El acoso escolar (bullying) y su asociación con trastornos psiquiátricos en una muestra de escolares en México [Bullying at school and its association with psychiatric disorders in a student sample in Mexico]. Salud Pública de México, 53(3), 220–227.Google Scholar
Boudreaux, M. J. (2016). Personality-related problems and the five-factor model of personality. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(4), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000185 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buelga, S., Cava, M. J., & Musitu, G. (2010). Cyberbullying: Victimización entre adolescentes a través del teléfono móvil y de Internet [Cyberbullying: Victimization among adolescents via cell phone and Internet]. Psicothema, 22(4), 784–789.Google ScholarPubMed
Buelga, S., & Pons, J. (2012). Agresiones entre adolescentes a través del teléfono móvil y de internet [Bullying in adolescents via cell phone and internet]. Psychosocial Intervention, 21(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2012v21n1a2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caravaca, F., Falcón, M., Navarro-Zaragoza, J., Luna, A., Rodriges, O., & Luna, A. (2016). Prevalence and patterns of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing among college population in Spain. BMC Public Health, 16, 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2857-8 Google Scholar
Casas, J. A., Del Rey, R., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2013). Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çelik, S., Atak, H., & Erguzen, A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 129–150.Google Scholar
De Angelis, G., Bacchini, D., & Affuso, G. (2016). The mediating role of domain judgement in the relation between the Big Five and bullying behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Rey, R., Elipe, P., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2012). Bullying and cyberbullying: Overlapping and predictive value of the co-occurrence. Behavior Psychology, 24, 608–613.Google ScholarPubMed
Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P., … & Plichta, P. (2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Aguado, M. J., Martínez, R., & Martín, J. (2013). El acoso escolar en España. Prevalencia, papeles adoptados por todo el grupo y características a las que atribuyen la victimización [School bullying in Spain. Prevalence, roles adopted group-wide, and characteristics to which they attribute victimization]. Revista de Educación, 362, 348–379. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-164 Google Scholar
Diepenhorst, A. (2014). Big Five personality traits and bullying (Unpublished bachelor’s thesis). Tilburg University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredstrom, B. K., Adams, R. E., & Gilman, R. (2011). Electronic and school-based victimization: Unique contexts for adjustment difficulties during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9569-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garaigordobil, M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: Una revisión [Prevalence and consequences of cyberbullying: A review]. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 233–254.Google Scholar
Garaigordobil, M., & Aliri, J. (2013). Ciberacoso (cyberbullying) en adolescentes y jóvenes del País Vasco: Diferencias de sexo en víctimas, agresores y observadores [Cyberbullying in adolescents and youths from Basque Country: Gender differences in victims, bullies, and witnesses]. Psicología Conductual, 21(3), 461–474.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five Factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodboy, A. K., & Martin, M. M. (2015). The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, R. D., Taylor, W. D., Smoski, M. J., Steffens, D. C., & Payne, M. E. (2013). Association of five-factor model personality domains and facets with presence, onset, and treatment outcomes of major depression in older adults. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(1), 88–96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in Internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.1.25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, M., Tremblay, R. E., Pagani, L., & Vitaro, F. (1997). Boys’ behavioral inhibition and the risk of later delinquency. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 809–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khosa, N. (2016). How personality effects [sic] victim’s response to cyberbullying (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Klimstra, T. A., Akse, J., Hale, W. III, Raaijmakers, Q., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). Longitudinal associations between personality traits and problem behavior symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6, Suppl.1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luengo, A., Sobral, J., Romero, E., & Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. (2002). Biología, personalidad y delincuencia [Biology, personality and delinquency]. Psicothema, 14, 16–25.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047232 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 160–178. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.160 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luengo, A., Sobral, J., Romero, E., & Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. (2002). Biología, personalidad y delincuencia [Biology, personality and delinquency]. Psicothema, 14, 16–25.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047232 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 160–178. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.160 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D., & Leukefeld, C. (2003). Examining antisocial behavior through the lens of the five-factor model of Personality. Aggressive Behavior, 29(6), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., Wolak, J., Ybarra, M. L., & Turner, H. (2011). Youth Internet victimization in a broader victimization context. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nansel, T., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simmons-Morton, B., & Schmidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Ortega-Ruiz, R., Del Rey, R., & Casas, J. A. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q [Assessment of bullying and cyberbullying, Spanish validation of the EBIP-Q and the ECIP-Q]. Psicología Educativa, 22, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortet, G., Escrivá, P., Ibáñez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., Mezquita, L., & Ruipérez, M. A. (2010). Versión corta de la adaptación española para adolescentes del NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-S) [Short-form version of the Spanish adaptation of the NEO-PI-R for adolescents (JS NEO-S)]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(2), 327–344.Google Scholar
Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., Viruela, A., & Mezquita, L. (2012). Assessing the five-factors of personality in adolescents: The junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 19, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111410166 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peluchette, J. V., Karl, K., Wood, C., & Williams, J. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization: Do victims’ personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyzalski, J. (2011). Electronic aggression among adolescents: An old house with a new facade (or even a number of houses). In Hällgren, C., Dunkels, E., & Frånberg, G. M. (Eds.), Youth culture and net culture: Online social practices (pp. 278–295). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polo, M. J., León, B., Fajardo, F., Felipe, E., & Palacios, V. (2014). Perfiles de personalidad en víctimas de acoso escolar [Personality profiles in victims of bullying at school]. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 409–415.Google Scholar
Romero, E., & Alonso, C. (2017). Callous-unemotional traits and the five-factor model in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM–VI–TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. K. (2015). The nature of cyberbullying and what we can do about it. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 15, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sourander, A., Jensen, P., Rönning, J. A., Elonheimo, H., Niemelä, S., Helenius, H., … Almqvist, F. (2007). Childhood bullies and victims and their risk of criminality in late adolescence: The Finnish from a boy to a man study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(6), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.6.546 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Toprak, F., & Vedder, P. (2017). Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 231–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(5), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, G. (2015, June). Successful anti-bullying approaches. Paper presented at the meeting of the Bullying and Health – Research Exchange Group, Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, Canada.Google Scholar