Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T14:49:29.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of Gender Stereotypes in Spain: Traits and Roles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Mercedes López-Sáez*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
J. Francisco Morales*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
Ana Lisbona*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to the authors: Facultad de Psicología, UNED, Departamento de Psicología Social y de las Organizaciones, C/ Juan del Rosal, 10, 28040 Madrid(Spain). E-mails: mlopez@psi.uned.es; folco_and@yahoo.es; amlisbona@psi.uned.esTranslation: Virginia Navascués Howard
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to the authors: Facultad de Psicología, UNED, Departamento de Psicología Social y de las Organizaciones, C/ Juan del Rosal, 10, 28040 Madrid(Spain). E-mails: mlopez@psi.uned.es; folco_and@yahoo.es; amlisbona@psi.uned.esTranslation: Virginia Navascués Howard
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to the authors: Facultad de Psicología, UNED, Departamento de Psicología Social y de las Organizaciones, C/ Juan del Rosal, 10, 28040 Madrid(Spain). E-mails: mlopez@psi.uned.es; folco_and@yahoo.es; amlisbona@psi.uned.esTranslation: Virginia Navascués Howard

Abstract

The aim of this study is twofold: to determine whether (and how) gender stereotypes have changed over time through a comparison of two different sets of data collected in 1993 (N = 1255) and 2001 (N = 1255) from a representative sample of the Spanish population, and to examine the relation between gender traits and roles and its stability over time. In addition, special attention is paid to the psychometric properties of the measures of gender traits and roles used in the study. The content of gender stereotypes was found to remain stable over the target period of time, confirming the classical typology (a higher assignment of expressive-communal traits to women and of instrumental-agentic traits to men). The structure of the gender-role questionnaire allows us to distinguish between family-role and work-role stereotyping. Gender-role stereotyping shows a marked decline between 1993 and 2001, a result that contrasts with the stability of trait-role stereotyping. The fact that a very low correlation is observed at the two time points between these two components of gender stereotyping strongly suggests their independence.

En este estudio se persigue un doble objetivo: comprobar la evolución de los estereotipos de género en dos aplicaciones, efectuadas en 1993 (N = 1255) y 2001 (N = 1255), ambas con muestras representativas de la población española, y analizar la relación que existe entre rasgos y roles, examinando si se han producido cambios en esa relación con el paso del tiempo. Asimismo, se analizan las propiedades psicométricas de las medidas de rasgo y de rol empleadas. Los resultados muestran que el contenido de los estereotipos de rasgo no se ha modificado, confirmándose la clásica tipología en la que se asignan más rasgos expresivo-comunales a las mujeres que a los hombres y, por el contrario, más rasgos instrumental-agentes a los hombres. La estructura del cuestionario de roles, permite diferenciar entre estereotipia de rol familiar y estereotipia de rol laboral. Al comparar la evolución de los estereotipos en este periodo, se observa un descenso en la estereotipia de la población española, más acusada en el componente de rol que en el de rasgo. La correlación entre ambos componentes es muy baja o no significativa, sin que se observen cambios importantes en la evolución de esa relación. Estos resultados parecen corroborar la independencia entre los componentes de rasgo y de rol.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, B.P. (1996). African Americans' and European Americans' mutual attributions: Adjective generation technique (AGT) stereotyping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 884912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, R.J., & Seta, C.E. (2005). Compensation for inconsistencies: The effects of stereotype strength on expectations of applicants' job success and satisfaction. Sex Roles, 53, 7987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, S.L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancor, V., Rodríguez, A., Rodríguez, R.Leyens, J.P., & Quiles, M.N. (2005). El efecto del estatus en la atribución de las dimensiones estereotípicas de sociabilidad y competencia. Psicothema, 17, 297302.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. N. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition, 7, 262274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotypes and sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S (1998). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 679696.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (2001). Should we take “gender” out of gender subtypes? The effects of gender, evaluative valence and context on the organization of person subtypes. Sex Roles, 45, 455480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L.L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationship among components and gender labels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 9911004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, LL. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, A.B., & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 11711188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A.H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior. Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A.H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A.B. (2000). Social Role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. & Trautner, H.M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Echebarria, A., & González, J.L. (1999). The impact of context on gender social identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 287304.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1999). Sexisms and other “isms”: Interdependence, status and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In Swann, W.B., Langlois, J.H., & Gilebert, L.A. (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society (pp. 193221) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Glick, P., Fiske, S.T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79, 763775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Rodríguez-Castro, Y. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexisms toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto de la Mujer – Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Mujeres y hombres en España 2006. Retrieved in 2007 from http://www.mtas.es/mujer/mujeres/estud_inves/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Jost, J.T., & Kay, A.C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killen, L.A., López-Zafra, E, & Eagly, A.H. (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: Comparisons of women and men in Spain and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 313322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Sáez, M., Lisbona, A., & Sáinz, M. (2004). Mujeres ingenieras: percepciones sobre su vida profesional. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 57, 161180.Google Scholar
López-Sáez, M., & Morales, J.F. (1995). Gender stereotypes in the Spanish population: Looking toward the future. In Amâncio, L. & Nogueira, C. (Eds.), Gender, management and science (pp. 151168). Braga, Portugal: Instituto de Educaçâo e Psicologia, Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
Markus, H., Crane, M.Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C.L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, C., Stitt, C.L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, J.F., & López-Sáez, M. (1993). Bases para la construcción de un sistema de indicadores sociales de estereotipia de género. Psicothema, 5, 123132.Google Scholar
Morales, J.F., & López-Sáez, M. (1994). Estereotipos de género y valores. In Alvaro, M. (Ed.), Propuesta de un sistema de indicadores sociales de igualdad entre géneros (pp. 375400). Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.Google Scholar
Moya, M.C., Navas, M.S., & Gómez, C. (1991, September). Escala sobre la Ideología del Rol Sexual. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Libro de comunicaciones del III Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social, 1, 554566.Google Scholar
Powell, G.N., Butterfield, D.A., & Parent, J.D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28, 177193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sczesny, S., Bosak, J., Neff, D., & Schyns, B. (2004). Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 51, 631645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2007). E-learning or she-learning? Exploring students' gendered perceptions of education technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 744746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 2, 457471.Google Scholar
Spence, J.T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, J.T., & Buckner, C.E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 4462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R.L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glas, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J., & White, G. B. (2006). Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 55, 259266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.E., & Best, D.L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotyping: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ximénez, M.C., & García, A.G. (2005). Comparación de los métodos de estimación de máxima verosimilitud y mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en el análisis factorial confirmatorio mediante simulación Monte Carlo. Psichotema, 17, 528535.Google Scholar