Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Labelling Improves False Belief Understanding. A Training Study

  • Elisabet Serrat Sellabona (a1), Carles Rostan Sánchez (a1), Eduard Vallès Majoral (a1), Moisès Esteban Guitart (a1), Francesc Sidera Caballero (a1) and Jèssica Serrano Ortiz (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

A total of 104 children aged between 41 and 47 months were selected to study the relationship between language and false belief understanding. Participants were assigned to four different training conditions: discourse, labelling, control (all with deceptive objects), and sentential complements (involving non-deceptive objects). Post-test results showed an improvement in children’s false belief understanding in the discourse and the labelling conditions, but not in the sentential complements with non-deceptive objects or the control group. Furthermore, the most remarkable improvement in false belief understanding occurred in the labelling group. These results suggest that some types of linguistic experience promote the development of false belief understanding, provided that differing perspectives are confronted.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Elisabet Serrat Sellabona. Departamento de Psicología. Universidad de Girona. Pl. Sant Domènec, 9. 17071 Girona (Spain). Phone: +34–972418754. Fax: +34–972418315. E-mail: elisabet.serrat@udg.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
This research was partially supported by a grant from Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (SEJ2006–12039) and a grant from the Universidad de Girona (SING2010B/9). The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.
Footnotes
References
Hide All
Astington J. W., & Jenkins J. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 13111320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311
Astington J. W., & Baird J. A. (2005). Why language matters for the theory of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0001
Bartsch K., & Wellman H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York; NY: Oxford University Press.
Cutting A., & Dunn J. (2006). Conversations with siblings and with friends: Links between relationship quality and social understanding. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 7387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151005X70337
de Villiers J. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In Astington J. W. & Baird J. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp.186219). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0001
de Villiers J., & de Villiers P. (2000). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. In Mitchell P. & Riggs K. J. (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 191228). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
de Villiers J., & Pyers J. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 10371060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00073-4
Doherty M. (2000). Children’s understanding of homonymy: Metalinguistic awareness and false belief. Journal of Child Language, 27, 367392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004153
Dunn L., Padilla E., Lugo D., & Dunn L. (1986). Test de Vocabulario de Imágenes Peabody. Adaptación Hispanoamericana. [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Latin American adaptation] . Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Flavell J. H. (1986). The development of children’s knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. American Psychologist, 41, 418425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.4.418
Gale E., de Villiers P., de Villiers J., & Pyers J. (1996) Language and theory of mind in oral deaf children. In Stringfellow A., Cahana-Amitay D., Hughes E., & Zukowski A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston university conference on language development (Vol. 1, pp. 213224). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Gopnik A., & Astington J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 2637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03192.x
Hale C. M., & Tager-Flusberg H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: A training study. Developmental Science, 6, 346359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00289
Happé F. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843855. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131954
Harris P. (2005). Conversation, pretense, and theory of mind. In Astington J. W. & Baird J. A. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 7083). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0001
Jacques S., & Zelazo D. (2005a). Language and the development of cognitive flexibility: Implications for theory of mind. In Astington J. W. & Baird J. A. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 144162). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0008
Jacques S., & Zelazo P. D. (2005b). On the possible socio-communicative roots of cognitive flexibility. In Homer B. D. & Tamis-Lemonda C. S. (Eds.), The development of social understanding and communication (pp. 5381). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kirkham N. Z., Cruess L., & Diamond A. (2003). Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task. Developmental Science, 6, 449467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00300
Lohmann H., & Tomasello M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74, 11301144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00597
Malle B. F. (2002). The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution. In Givón T., & Malle B. F. (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language. (pp. 265284). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
Meins E., & Fernyhough C. (2007). Preschoolers’ understanding of multiple orientations to reality: The Adjectives task. Cognitive Development, 22, 289297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.008
Milligan K., Astington J. W., & Dack L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x
Müller U., Zelazo P. D., Hood S., Leone T., & Rohrer L. (2004). Interference control in a new rule use task: Age-related changes, labeling, and attention. Child Development, 75, 15941609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00759.x
Müller U., Zelazo P. D., Lurye L. E., & Liebermann D. P. (2008). The effect of labeling on preschool children’s performance in the dimensional change card sort task. Cognitive Development, 23, 395408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.06.001
Müller U., Jacques S., Brocki K., & Zelazo P. (2009). The executive functions of language in preschool children. In Winsler A., Fernyhough C., & Montero I. (Eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp. 5368). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581533
Olson D. R. (1988). On the origins of beliefs and other intentional states in children. In Astington J. W., Harris P. L., & Olson D. R. (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 414426). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Perner J., Stummer S., Sprung M., & Doherty M. (2002). Theory of mind finds its piagetian perspective: Why alternative naming comes with understanding belief. Cognitive Development, 17, 14511472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00127-2
Peterson C. C., & Siegal M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and Theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 459474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01303.x
Peterson C. C., & Siegal M. (2000). Insights into theory of mind from deafness and autism. Mind and Language, 15, 123145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00126
Ruffman T., Slade L., Rowlandson K., Rumsey C., & Garnham A. (2003). How language relates to belief, desire, and emotion understanding. Cognitive Development, 18, 139158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(03)00002-9
Schick B., de Villiers P., de Villiers J., & Hoffmeister R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78, 376396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01004.x
Slade L., & Ruffman T. (2005). How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of sintax, semantics, working memory and false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 117141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151004X21332
Tardif T., & Wellman H. M. (2000). Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking children. Developmental Psychology, 36, 2543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.25
Tomasello M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello M., & Carpenter M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10, 121125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x
Towse J. N., Redbone J., Houston-Price C., & Cook S. (2000). Understanding the dimensional change card sort. Cognitive Development, 15, 347365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00021-6
Wimmer H., & Perner J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Spanish Journal of Psychology
  • ISSN: 1138-7416
  • EISSN: 1988-2904
  • URL: /core/journals/spanish-journal-of-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 27 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 207 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.