Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T13:41:45.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Four Twice as Nice as Two? A Natural Experiment on Electoral Effects of Term Length

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Brian J. Gaines ,
Timothy P. Nokken  and
Collin Groebe
Brian J. Gaines*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, USA
Timothy P. Nokken
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA
Collin Groebe
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, USA
*
Brian J. Gaines, University of Illinois, 1007 W. Nevada St., Urbana, IL 61801, USA Email: bjgaines@illinois.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Illinois and Texas, senate elections return members to serve terms of different length. Because term length schedules are randomized, these states provide a natural experiment. Cross-sectional comparison of chambers requires statistical controls for myriad factors that distinguish cases (chambers or periods). These two chambers, by contrast, produce direct evidence of term length's impact on electoral behavior. We test hypotheses about term length's impact on candidacies, campaign expenditures, and voter participation with data from 1968 to 2010. Surprisingly, there is little evidence of any significant differences between contests for two-year and four-year terms.

Keywords

comparative legislatureselectoral systemsfield experimentlegislative electionsquantitative methods
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 43 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, Robert A. 1991. “Strategic Shifts—Safeguarding the Public Interest—United States Senators, 1971–86.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. 1996. “A Dynamic Analysis of the Role of War Chests in Campaign Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 40:352–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections.” Journal of Politics 62:671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., Berry, William D., Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Snyder, James M.. 2008. State Legislative Election Returns, 1967-2003. ICPSR Data Set 21480. [Appendix A, at http://spa.sagepub.com]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer. 1935. The Design of Experiments. London, UK: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Glazer, Amihai, and Grofman, Bernard. 1987. “Two Plus Two Plus Two Equals Six: Tenure in Office of Senators and Representatives, 1953-1983.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12:555–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodliffe, Jay. 2001. “The Effects of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45:830–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2009. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 7th ed. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Joens, David A. 2000. Almanac of Illinois Politics—2000. Springfield, IL: Illinois Institute for Public Affairs/University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
Karhliker, Amy S., ed. 2006. Almanac of Illinois Politics—2006. Springfield, IL: Center for State Policy and Leadership/University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
Kingston, Mike, ed. 1985. Texas Almanac, Sesquicentennial Edition 1986-87. Dallas, TX: Dallas Morning News.Google Scholar
Kingston, Mike, ed. 1989. Texas Almanac 1990-91. Dallas, TX: Dallas Morning News.Google Scholar
Kingston, Mike, ed. 1991. Texas Almanac 1992-93. Dallas, TX: Dallas Morning News.Google Scholar
Kwang, S. Shin, and Jackson, John S. III. 1979. “Turnover in U.S. State Legislatures: 1931-1976.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4:95–104.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Winsky, Laura R.. 1987. “Membership Turnover in U.S. State Legislatures: Trends and Effects of Districting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12:115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pass, Fred, ed. 1979. Texas Almanac 1980-81. Dallas, TX: Dallas Morning News.Google Scholar
Van Der Slik, Jack R., ed. 1990/1992. Almanac of Illinois Politics. Springfield, IL: Illinois Issues/Sangamon State University.Google Scholar
Van Der Slik, Jack R., ed. 1994. Almanac of Illinois Politics—1994. Springfield, IL: Illinois Institute for Public Affairs/ Sangamon State University.Google Scholar
Van Der Slik, Jack R., ed. 1996/1998. Almanac of Illinois Politics. Springfield, IL: Illinois Institute for Public Affairs/University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
Van Dyke-Brown, Barbara, ed. 2002. Almanac of Illinois Politics—2002. Springfield, IL: Illinois Institute for Public Affairs/University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
Van Dyke-Brown, Barbara, ed. 2003. Almanac of Illinois Politics—2004. Springfield, IL: Institute for Legislative Studies/University of Illinois at Springfield.Google Scholar
Winburn, Jonathan. 2008. “Setting the Senate Apart: Institutional Variation and Political Career Patterns in the State Legislatures.” American Review of Politics 29:49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, Alan. 2005. “Partisan Strategy and Support in State Legislative Elections: The Case of Illinois.” American Politics Research 33:376–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C., and Berkman, Michael B.. 1986. “Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections.” American Political Science Review 80:567–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar