Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T06:50:04.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rules, Roles, and Minority Representation: The Dynamics of Budgeting for Bilingual Education in Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Scott E. Robinson
Scott E. Robinson*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Dallas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can minority representation influence policy outputs when decisions are largely governed by formal and informal rules? This article addresses this question using detailed data on school district representation and budgetary allotments in Texas, assessing the link between Hispanic school board representation and budgetary support for bilingual education. My findings suggest that descriptive representation does affect the budgetary process. My analyses also suggest that modeling representation as a role rather than as an input provides greater insight into the representational process.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Spring 2002 , pp. 52 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, Donald. 1995. Budgeting for Modern Government. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bali, Valentina A. 2001. “Sink or Swim: What Happened to California's Bilingual Students after Proposition 227?” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1:296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedix, Reinhard. 1949. Higher Civil Servants in American Society. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. III. 1995. “The Impact of Changing the Racial Composition of Congressional Districts on Legislators' Roll Call Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly 23:141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T., Schousen, Matthew M., and Sellars, Patrick J.. 1996. “The Supply Side of Racial Redistricting: Race and Strategic Politicians, 1972-1992.” The Journal of Politics 58:846–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 1996. “Adaptive Signal Processing, Hierarchy, and Budgetary Control in Federal Regulation.” American Political Science Review 90:283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denhardt, Robert B., and deLeon, Linda. 1993. “Great Thinkers in Personnel Management.” In Handbook of Public Personnel Management. ed. Rabin, Jack, Vocino, Thomas, Bartley Hildreth, W., and Miller, Gerald J.. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. “Measuring the Electoral and Policy Impact of Majority-Minority Voting Districts.” American Journal of Political Science 43:367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, C. W., and Nubold, P.. 1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 2:111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, William H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1989. “Congressional Responsiveness to Constituency Change.” American Journal of Political Science 29:265–274.Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney E. 1992. Latinos and the U.S. Political System: Two Tiered Pluralism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney E., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?” American Journal of Political Science 39:640–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent L. 1998. “Issue Salience and Support for Civil Rights Legislation among Southern Democrats.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Brinck, and Miller, Will. 1997. “Latino Representation: It's Direct and Indirect.” American Journal of Political Science 41:1066–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsley, J. Donald. 1944. Representative Bureaucracy. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. 1996. Federalist Papers. Ed. Fairfield, Roy P.. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78:743–749.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, Eugene B. 1974. “Social Equity and the Public Service.” Public Administration Review 34:18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 1975. “Representative Bureaucracy: An Empirical Analysis.” American Political Science Review 69:526–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. “Latinos and Representative Bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson Hypotheses.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3:393–414.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Nigro, Lloyd G.. 1976. “Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal Executives.” Public Administration Review 36:458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Stewart, Joseph Jr. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1869]1975. On Liberty. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.Google Scholar
Saltzstein, Grace Hall. 1979. “Representative Bureaucracy and Bureaucratic Behavior: Problems and Prospects.” Administration and Society 10:464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, Sally Coleman. 1997. The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Selden, Sally Coleman, Brudney, Jeffrey L., and Edward Kellough, J.. 1998. “Bureaucracy as a Representative Institution: Toward a Reconciliation of Bureaucratic Government and Democratic Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 42:717–744.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Bonchek, Mark S.. 1997. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
StataCorp. 1999. Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
Toppo, Greg. 2001. “House Bill Would Limit Bilingual Education,” The Associated Press State and Local Wire, 19 May.Google Scholar
Walters, Ronald. 1992. “Two Political Traditions: Black Politics in the 1990s.” The National Political Science Review 3:198–207.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R.. 1984. “Hispanic Representation in the U.S. Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 65:328–335.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1988. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company.Google Scholar