Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:32:49.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can a System be Defined for the New Edition of the Yale Parallax Catalogue?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

William van Altena*
Affiliation:
Yale University Observatory P.O. Box 6666 New Haven, CT 06511

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A preliminary analysis has been made of data in the forthcoming edition of the Yale Parallax Catalogue to study the possibility of defining a system of observatory zero-points and external accuracies. Based on this analysis and those of several other authors, I conclude that it is not likely that a unique system of zero-points can be established. It may, however, be possible to establish some values for the average external accuracy of the parallaxes, but more work remains to be done on both of these issues. These conclusions are in agreement with those reached by several other authors.

Type
III. Photographic Astrometry
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Atkinson, R. d'E. (1971). Publ. Leander Mc Cormick Obs. XVI, 259.Google Scholar
Breakiron, L.A., and Upgren, A.R. (1978). Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 10, 402.Google Scholar
Hamaker, H.C. (1978). Appl. Stat. 27, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R.B. (1978). in Modern Astrometry, edited by Prochazka, F.V. and Tucker, R.H., University Obs., Vienna, p. 31.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B. (1980). Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc. 192, 347.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B., and Lutz, T.E. (1983). Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc. 202, 201.Google Scholar
Hertzsprung, E. (1952). Observatory 72, 242.Google Scholar
Jenkins, L.F. (1952). General Catalogue of Trigonometric Stellar Parallaxes, Yale University Observatory, New Haven.Google Scholar
Jenkins, L.F. (1963). Supplement to the General Catalogue of Trigonometric Stellar Parallaxes, Yale University Observatory, New Haven.Google Scholar
Lutz, T.E. (1978). in Modern Astronometry, edited by Prochazka, F.V. and Tucker, R.H., University Observatory, Vienna, p. 7.Google Scholar
Lutz, T.E., Hanson, R.B., Marcus, A.H., and Nicholson, W.L. (1981). Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc. 197, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard-Nielsen, H.U. (1977). Astron. Astrophys. 59, 203.Google Scholar
Schelsinger, F. (1925). Trans. Int. Astron. Union, II, Report of Commission 24.Google Scholar
Schilt, J. (1954). Astron. J. 59, 55.Google Scholar
Strand, K. Aa. (1963). in Basic Astronomical Data, edited by Strand, K. Aa., Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 55.Google Scholar
Turon Lacarrieu, C., and Crézé, M. (1977). Astron. Astrophys. 56, 273.Google Scholar
Upgren, A.R., and Carpenter, K.G. (1977). Astron. J. 82, 227.Google Scholar
Vasilevskis, S. (1966). Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 4, 57.Google Scholar
West, R. (1969). Astron. Astrophys. 3, 1.Google Scholar