Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:10:51.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cross Sectional Magnetic Profile of a Coronal Transient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

M. K. Bird
Affiliation:
Radioastronomisches Institut, Universitaet Bonn, Bonn F.R.G.
H. Volland
Affiliation:
Radioastronomisches Institut, Universitaet Bonn, Bonn F.R.G.
B. L. Seidel
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91103, U.S.A.
C. T. Stelzried
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91103, U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The role of the magnetic field in a coronal mass ejection event has not been unequivocally defined, and may in fact be quite variable in view of the large variety of shapes and sizes of coronal transients. Measurements of the magnetic field associated with these events have thus far been inferred from simultaneously observed radio bursts, which provide no information on the direction of the field and are limited in spatial resolution. Substantial improvement in these two areas could be achieved by continuous monitoring of the Faraday rotation of a linearly polarized spacecraft signal during solar occultation. A coronal event traversing the line-of-sight would yield a characteristic profile in cross section, which would be of value for discriminating between the various models of coronal transients.

Type
Part VI. Coronal and Interplanetary Responses to Short Time Scale Phenomena: - Theoretical Considerations
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1980 

References

Anzer, U., Solar Phys. 57, 111118, 1978.Google Scholar
Bird, M.K., Volland, H., Stelzried, C.T., Levy, G.S. and Seidel, B.L., in Contributed papers to STIP Symposium, Tel Aviv, 1977, Eds. Shea, M.A., Smart, D.F. and Wu, S.T. (Also: Air Force Geophys. Lab. Report No. AFGl-TR-77-0309), pp 6375, 1977.Google Scholar
Dryer, M., Wu, S.T., Steinolfson, R.S. and Wilson, R.M., Astrophys. J. 227, 10591071, 1979.Google Scholar
Dulk, G.A., Smerd, S.F., MacQueen, R.M., Gosling, J.T., Magun, A., Stewart, R.T., Sheridan, K.V., Robinson, R.D. and Jacques, S., Solar Phys. 49, 369394, 1976.Google Scholar
Gergely, T.E., Kundu, M.R., Munro, R.H. and Poland, A.I., Astrophys. J. 230, 575580, 1979.Google Scholar
Gosling, J.T., Hildner, E., MacQueen, R.M., Munro, R.H., Poland, A.I. and Ross, C.L., Solar Phys. 48, 389397, 1976.Google Scholar
Hildner, E., Gosling, J.T., Hanson, R.T. and Bohlin, J.D., Solar Phys. 45, 363376, 1975.Google Scholar
Hildner, E., Gosling, J.T., MacQueen, R.M., Munro, R.H., Poland, A.I. and Ross, C.L., Solar Phys. 48, 127135, 1976.Google Scholar
Levy, G.S., Sato, T., Seidel, B.L., Stelzried, C.T., Ohlson, J.E. and Rusch, W.V.T., Science 166, 596598, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouschovias, T.C. and Poland, A.I., Astrophys. J. 220, 675682, 1978.Google Scholar
Munro, R.H., Gosling, J.T., Hildner, E., MacQueen, R.M., Poland, A.I. and Ross, C.L., Solar Phys. 61, 201215, 1979.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y., Wu, S.T. and Han, S.M., Astrophys. J. 219, 314323, 1978.Google Scholar
Pintér, S., Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 24, 337342, 1973.Google Scholar
Schatten, K.H., Solar Phys. 12, 484491, 1970.Google Scholar
Steinolfson, R.S., Wu, S.T., Dryer, M. and Tandberg-Hanssen, E., Astrophys. J. 225, 259274, 1978.Google Scholar
Wu, S.T., Dryer, M., Nakagawa, Y. and Han, S.M., Astrophys. J. 219, 324335, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar