Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:42:30.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Far ultra-violet radiation : stars, nebulae and interstellar matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

M. J. Seaton
M. J. Seaton*
Affiliation:
University College, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ultra-violet flux radiated by hot stars is found to be smaller than the value deduced from theory. The possible origins of this discrepancy are discussed : interstellar absorption, deviation from local thermodynamic equilibrium, molecular absorption, blanketting effect. Observations of planetary nebulae provide data about UV radiation from very hot stars.

Le flux ultraviolet observé dans les étoiles chaudes est inférieur au flux calculé. Les causes possibles de cette différence sont discutées : absorption interstellaire, écarts à l'ETL, absorption moléculaire, absorption atomique, effet de blanhetting. UObservation des nébuleuses planétaires permet d'étudier le rayonnement U. V. des étoiles tres chaudes.

Резюме

Резюме

Наблюдаемый ультрафиолетовый поток горячих звезд меньше вычисленного потока. Обсуждены возможецые причины этой разницы : межзвездное поглощение, отклонения в локальном термодинамическом равновесии, молеклярное поглощение, атомное поглощение эффект blankett'.ng. Наблюдение планетарных туманностей позволяет изучать излучение UV горячих звезд.

Type
Session IV. Far Ultra-Violet Radiation : Stars and Galaxies
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 23: Astronomical Observations from Space Vehicles , 1965 , pp. 133 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © CNRS 1965 

References

1. Stecher, T. P. and Milligan, J. E., 1962, Ap. J., 136, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chubb, T.A. and Byram, E.T., 1963, Ap. J., 138, 617.Google Scholar
3. Alexander, J. D. H., Bowen, P. J. and Heddle, D. W. O., 1964, Proc. Roy. Soc., A279, 510.Google Scholar
4. Gulledge, I. S. and Packer, D. M., 1963, A. J., 68, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Strömgren, B., 1964, Rev. Mod. Phys., 36, 532.Google Scholar
6. Canavaggia, R. and Pecker, J.-C., 1953, Ann. d'Astr., 16, 47.Google Scholar
7. Underhill, A. B., 1963, Space. Sci. Rev., 1, 749.Google Scholar
8. Pecker, J.-C., 1963, Space Sci. Rev., 1, 729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Meinel, A. B., 1963, Ap. J., 137, 321.Google Scholar
10. Gaustad, J. E. and Spitzer, L., 1961, Ap. J., 134, 771.Google Scholar
11. Morton, D. C., 1964, Ap. J., 139, 1383.Google Scholar
12. Solomon, P. M., 1964, Ap. J., 139, 999.Google Scholar
13. Werner, M. W., 1964, Ap. J., 139, 1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Lucy, L., 1963, , Manchester.Google Scholar
15. Gebbie, K. B., 1965, , London.Google Scholar
16. Chalonge, D. and Divan, L., 1952, Ann. d'Astr., 15, 201.Google Scholar
17. Underhill, A. B., 1951, Publ. Dom. Astrophys. Obs., 8, 357.Google Scholar
18. Strom, S. E., 1964, , Harvard.Google Scholar
19. Osawa, K., 1956, Ap. J., 123, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Boggess, A. E., 1961, Mém. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, 4, 459.Google Scholar
21. Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, N. C., 1963, M. N., 126, 401.Google Scholar
22. Hanbury Brown, R., Hazard, C., Davies, J. and Allen, L. R., 1964, Nature, 201, 111.Google Scholar
23. Cayrel, R., 1957, Thèse, Paris.Google Scholar
24. Zanstra, H., 1960, B. A. N., 15, 237; Quarterly J., R. A. S., 2, 137.Google Scholar
25. Gebbie, K. B. and Seaton, M. J., 1963, Nature, 199, 580.Google Scholar
26. Seaton, M. J., 1960, Rep. Progr. Phys., 23, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Harman, R. J. and Seaton, M. J., 1964, Ap. J., 140, 824.Google Scholar
28. Byram, E. T., Chubb, T. A. and Friedman, H., 1964, Ap. J., 139, 1135.Google Scholar
29. Code, A. D., 1960, A. J., 65, 278.Google Scholar
30. Aller, L. H., 1961, Mém. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, 4, 535.Google Scholar
31. Osterbrock, D. E., 1963, Plan. Sp. Sci., 11, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Hummer, D. G. and Seaton, M. J., 1964, M. N., 127, 217.Google Scholar
33. Spitzer, L. and Zabriskie, F. R., 1959, P.A.S.P., 71, 412.Google Scholar
34. Cook, A. H., 1963, Quarterly J., R. A. S., 4, 203.Google Scholar
35. O'Dell, C. R., 1962, Ap. J., 135, 371.Google Scholar