Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:56:01.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravitational Lenses and Dark Matter: Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Edwin L. Turner
Edwin L. Turner*
Affiliation:
Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Following a few general comments on gravitational lenses from an observer's perspective, the currently available observations of the six known gravitational lenses are summarized. Attention is then called to some regularities and peculiarities of the properties of the known lenses and to how they might be interpreted. The most important conclusions relevant to the dark matter problem which can be obtained from the current observations are that the distributions of mass and light appear to be quite different in at least some of the lensing objects and that objects with projected M/R values about ten times larger than those ordinarily associated with galaxies exist and are not too rare (assuming Λ = 0).

Type
Review Paper
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 117: Dark Matter in the Universe , 1987 , pp. 227 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

1. Stockton, A. 1980, Ap. J. Lett., 242, L141.Google Scholar
2. Henry, J.P. 1984, private communication.Google Scholar
3. Gunn, J.E., and Schneider, D.P. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
4. Schneider, D.P., Lawrence, C.R., Schmidt, M., Gunn, J.E., Turner, E.L., Burke, B.F., and Dhawan, V. 1985, Ap. J., 294, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Tyson, J.A. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
6. Tyson, J.A. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
7. Turner, E L. 1980, Ap. J. Lett., 242, L135.Google Scholar
9. Weymann, R.J., Latham, D., Angel, J.R.P., Green, R.F., Leibert, J.W., Turnshek, D.E., Tyson, J.A. 1980, Nature, 285, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Djorgovski, S., and Spinrad, H. 1984, Ap. J. Lett., 282, L1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lawrence, C.R., Schneider, D.P., Schmidt, M., Bennett, C.L., Hewitt, J.N., Burke, B.F., Turner, E.L., and Gunn, J.E. 1984, Science, 223, 46.Google Scholar
12. Huchra, J., Gorenstein, M., Kent, S., Shapiro, I., Smith, G., Horne, E., and Perley, R. 1985, A.J., 90, 691.Google Scholar
13. Weedman, D., Weymann, R.J., Green, R.F., and Heckman, T.M. 1982, Ap. J. Lett., 255, L5.Google Scholar
14. Young, P.J., Gunn, J.E., Kristian, J., Oke, J.B., and Westphal, J.A. 1980, Ap. J., 241, 507; Greenfield, P.E., Roberts, D.H., and Burke, B.F. 1985, Ap. J., 293, 370; Falco, E.E., Gorenstein, M. V., and Shapiro, I.I. 1985, Ap. J. Lett., 289, L1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Lee, H.M., and Gott, J.R. 1986, Ap. J., submitted.Google Scholar
16. Narashimha, D., Subramanian, K., and Chitre, S.M. 1984, Ap. J., 283, 512; and reference 4 above.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Yahil, A. 1977, Ap. J., 217, 27; Baldwin, J.E., Lynden-Bell, D., and Sancisi, R. 1980, MNRAS, 193, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. See references 3 and 10 above.Google Scholar
19. Burke, W.L. 1981, Ap. J. Lett., 244, L1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Lawrence, C.R. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
21. Turner, E.L., Ostriker, J.P., and Gott, J.R. 1984, Ap. J., 284, 1; and reference 7 above.Google Scholar
22. Rubin, V.C., Ford, W.K., and Thonnard, N. 1978, Ap. J. Lett., 225, L107; and see paper by V. C. Rubin in this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Hewitt, J.N. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
24. Hewitt, J.N., and Turner, E.L. 1986, in preparation.Google Scholar
25. Gott, J.R. 1981, Ap. J., 243, 140; Paczynski, B. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar