Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T23:56:35.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Activity of Pre-main Sequence Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Eric D. Feigelson*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park PA 16802 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I review here recent advances in our understanding of magnetic activity in pre-main sequence (PMS) protostars and T Tauri stars. Results are based on recent imaging, spectroscopic and temporal studies of nearby star forming regions from the Chandra Xray Observatory and XMMNewton, including a first look at an ultradeep Chandra exposure of the Orion Nebula Cluster.

Pre-main sequence stars exhibit a high level of X-ray emission dominated by a bewildering variety of magnetic reconnection flares. Activity is linked to bulk stellar properties — Lbol, mass, surface area or volume — rather than rotation. This suggests that dynamo processes in deeply convective PMS stars may fundamentally differ from the tachocline dynamo operating in main sequence stars.

X-rays and MeV particles from magnetic flares will affect the circumstellar environment in PMS systems, particularly the protoplanetary disk. X-ray emission may influence: disk ionization, turbulence and viscosity; Jovian planet formation and migration; the production of meteoritic isotopes and melting of meteoritic chondrules; the heating and chemistry of the disk. X-ray surveys are also effective in locating post-T Tauri stars for disk evolution studies.

Type
Part 5: Stellar Magnetic Activity and Evolution
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Aikawa, Y. & Herbst, E. 2001, A&A, 371, 1107.Google Scholar
Bally, J., Feigelson, E., & Reipurth, B. 2003, ApJ, 584, 843.Google Scholar
Barnes, S. A. 2003, ApJ, 586, 464.Google Scholar
Bary, J. S., Weintraub, D. A., & Kastner, J. H. 2003, ApJ, 586, 1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuther, H., Kerp, J., Preibisch, T., Stanke, T., & Schilke, P. 2002, A&A, 395, 169.Google Scholar
Bower, G. C., Plambeck, R. L., Bolatto, A., McCrady, N., Graham, J. R., de Pater, I., Liu, M. C. & Baganoff, F. K., 2003, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0308277).Google Scholar
Brinkman, A. C. et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L324.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, C., Caux, E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Kemper, F., Waters, L. B. F. M., & Phillips, T. 2002, A&A, 395, L29.Google Scholar
Drake, J. J., Peres, G., Orlando, S., Laming, J. M., & Maggio, A. 2000, ApJ, 545, 1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, J. J., Brickhouse, N. S., Kashyap, V., Laming, J. M., Huenemoerder, D. P., Smith, R., & Wargelin, B. J. 2001, ApJ, 548, L81.Google Scholar
Durney, B. R., De Young, D. S., & Roxburgh, I. W. 1993, Solar Phys., 145, 207.Google Scholar
Evans, N. R., Seward, F. D., Krauss, M. I., Isobe, T., Nichols, J., Schlegel, E. M., & Wolk, S. J. 2003, ApJ, 589, 509.Google Scholar
Favata, F., Fridlund, C. V. M., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., & Kaas, A. A. 2002, A&A, 386, 204.Google Scholar
Favata, F., Giardino, G., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., & Damiani, F. 2003, A&A, 403, 187.Google Scholar
Feigelson, E. D. 1982, Icarus, 51, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigelson, E. D. & Montmerle, T. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 363.Google Scholar
Feigelson, E. D., Broos, P., Gaffney, J. A., Garmire, G., Hillenbrand, L. A., Pravdo, S. H., Townsley, L., & Tsuboi, Y. 2002a, ApJ, 574, 258.Google Scholar
Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G. P., & Pravdo, S. H. 2002b, ApJ, 572, 335.Google Scholar
Feigelson, E. D., Gaffney, J. A., Garmire, G., Hillenbrand, L. A., & Townsley, L. 2003a, ApJ, 584, 911.Google Scholar
Feigelson, E. D., Lawson, W. A. & Garmire, G. P., 2003b, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0309059).Google Scholar
Flaccomio, E., Damiani, F., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., Harnden, F. R., Murray, S. S., & Wolk, S. J. 2003a, ApJ, 582, 382.Google Scholar
Flaccomio, E., Damiani, F., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., Harnden, F. R., Murray, S. S., & Wolk, S. J. 2003b, ApJ, 582, 398.Google Scholar
Ferro-Fontán, C. & de Castro, A. I. G. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 427.Google Scholar
Garmire, G., Feigelson, E. D., Broos, P., Hillenbrand, L. A., Pravdo, S. H., Townsley, L., & Tsuboi, Y. 2000, AJ, 120, 1426.Google Scholar
Getman, K. V., Feigelson, E. D., Townsley, L., Bally, J., Lada, C. J., & Reipurth, B. 2002, ApJ, 575, 354.Google Scholar
Getman, K. V., Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G., Murray, S. S. & Harnden, F. R., 2003, IAU Circ. 8068, 2.Google Scholar
Glassgold, A. E., Feigelson, E. D., & Montmerle, T. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, 429.Google Scholar
Goswami, J. N. & Vanhala, H. A. T. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, 963.Google Scholar
Güdel, M., Guinan, E. F., & Skinner, S. L. 1997, ApJ, 483, 947.Google Scholar
Güdel, M., Audard, M., Kashyap, V. L., Drake, J. J., & Guinan, E. F. 2003, ApJ, 582, 423.Google Scholar
Güdel, M. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 217.Google Scholar
Hartmann, L. W. & Noyes, R. W. 1987, ARA&A, 25, 271.Google Scholar
Imanishi, K., Koyama, K., & Tsuboi, Y. 2001a, ApJ, 557, 747.Google Scholar
Imanishi, K., Tsujimoto, M., & Koyama, K. 2001b, ApJ, 563, 361.Google Scholar
Imanishi, K., Tsujimoto, M., & Koyama, K. 2002, ApJ, 572, 300.Google Scholar
Imanishi, K., Nakajima, H., Tsujimoto, M., Koyama, K., & Tsuboi, Y. 2003, PASJ, 55, 653.Google Scholar
Jayawardhana, R. & Greene, T., (eds.) 2001, Young Stars Near Earth: Progress and Prospects, ASP Conf. 244.Google Scholar
Jeans, J. H. 1928, Astronomy and Cosmogony, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kastner, J. H., Huenemoerder, D. P., Schulz, N. S., Canizares, C. R., & Weintraub, D. A. 2002, ApJ, 567, 434.Google Scholar
Kohno, M., Koyama, K., & Hamaguchi, K. 2002, ApJ, 567, 423.Google Scholar
Küker, M. & Stix, M. 2001, A&A, 366, 668.Google Scholar
Laughlin, G., Steinacker, A. & Adams, F. 2003, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0308406.Google Scholar
Marino, A., Micela, G., Peres, G., & Sciortino, S. 2003, A&A, 407, L63.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. & Purditz, R. E., 2003, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0308039.Google Scholar
Nakajima, H., Imanishi, K., Takagi, S., Koyama, K., & Tsujimoto, M. 2003, PASJ, 55, 635.Google Scholar
Papaloizou, J. C., Nelson, R. P. & Snellgrove, M. D. 2003, MNRAS, submitted, astro-ph/0308351.Google Scholar
Pravdo, S. H., Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G., Maeda, Y., Tsuboi, Y., & Bally, J. 2001, Nature, 413, 708.Google Scholar
Preibisch, T. & Zinnecker, H. 2001, AJ, 122, 866.Google Scholar
Preibisch, T. & Zinnecker, H. 2002, AJ, 123, 1613.Google Scholar
Preibisch, T. 2003, A&A, 401, 543.Google Scholar
Rauw, G., Nazé, Y., Gosset, E., Stevens, I. R., Blomme, R., Corcoran, M. F., Pittard, J. M., & Runacres, M. C. 2002, A&A, 395, 499.Google Scholar
Rauw, G., De Becker, M., Gosset, E., Pittard, J. M., & Stevens, I. R. 2003, A&A, 407, 925.Google Scholar
Randich, S. 2000, in Stellar Clusters and Associations: Convection, Rotation, and Dynamos, ASP Conf. 198, 401.Google Scholar
Schrijver, C. J. & Zwaan, C. 2000, Solar and stellar magnetic activity, Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, N. S., Canizares, C., Huenemoerder, D., Kastner, J. H., Taylor, S. C., & Bergstrom, E. J. 2001, ApJ, 549, 441.Google Scholar
Shang, H., Glassgold, A. E., Shu, F. H., & Lizano, S. 2002, ApJ, 564, 853.Google Scholar
Shu, F. H., Shang, H., Gounelle, M., Glassgold, A. E., & Lee, T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 1029.Google Scholar
Skinner, S., Gagne, M., & Belzer, E. 2003, astro-ph/0306566.Google Scholar
Stelzer, B., Huélamo, N., Hubrig, S., Zinnecker, H., & Micela, G. 2003, A&A, 407, 1067.Google Scholar
Tsuboi, Y., Koyama, K., Hamaguchi, K., Tatematsu, K., Sekimoto, Y., Bally, J., & Reipurth, B. 2001, ApJ, 554, 734.Google Scholar
Tsuboi, Y., Maeda, Y., Feigelson, E. D., Garmire, G. P., Chartas, G., Mori, K., & Pravdo, S. H. 2003, ApJ, 587, L51.Google Scholar
Tsujimoto, M., Koyama, K., Tsuboi, Y., Goto, M., & Kobayashi, N. 2002, ApJ, 566, 974r.Google Scholar
Winters, W. F., Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 2003, ApJ, 589, 543.Google Scholar
Woolum, D. S. & Hohenberg, C. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, 903.Google Scholar