Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:32:31.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of galaxy dark matter halos from weak lensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Henk Hoekstra
Affiliation:
Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, M5S 3H8, Toronto, Canada
Howard K.C. Yee
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, M5S 3H8, Toronto, Canada
Michael D. Gladders
Affiliation:
Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the results of a study of the average mass profile around galaxies using weak gravitational lensing. We use 45.5 deg2 of RC band imaging data from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS) and define a sample of ~ 1.2 × 105 lenses with 19.5 < RC < 21, and a sample of ~ 1.5 × 106 background galaxies with 21.5 < R < 24.

We constrain the power law scaling relations between the B-band luminosity and the mass and size of the halo, and find that the results are in excellent agreement with observed luminosity–line-width relations. Under the assumption that the luminosity does not evolve with redshift, the best fit NFW model yields a mass M200 = (8.8±0.7) × 1011h–1M and a scale radius rs = I6.7+3.7–3.0h–1 kpc for a galaxy with a fiducial luminosity of Lb = 1010h–2LB⊙. the latter result is in excellent agreement with predictions from numerical simulations for a halo of this mass. We also observe a signficant anisotropy of the lensing signal around the lenses, implying that the halos are flattened and aligned with the light distribution. We find an average (projected) halo ellipticity of 〈ehalo〉 = 0.20+0.04–0.05, in fair agreement with results from numerical simulations of CDM. Alternative theories of gravity (without dark matter) predict an isotropic lensing signal, which is excluded with 99.5% confidence. Hence, our results provide strong support for the existence of dark matter.

Type
Part 13: The Shapes and Extents of Dark Halos
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Dubinski, J. & Carlberg, R.G. 1991, ApJ, 378, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H.K.C., Gladders, M.D., Barrientos, L.F., Hall, P.B., & Infante, L. 2002, ApJ, 572, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H.K.C., & Gladders, 2003, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0306515.Google Scholar
McKay, T.A., et al. 2001, astro-ph/0108013.Google Scholar
Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., & White, S.D.M. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verheijen, M.A.W. 2001, ApJ, 563, 694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yee, H.K.C., et al. 2000, ApJS, 129, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yee, H.K.C., & Gladders, M.D. 2002, in AMiBA 2001: High-z Clusters, Missing Baryons, and CMB Polarization, eds. Chen, L.-W. et al. (San Francisco: ASP), p.109.Google Scholar