Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T13:05:27.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zeeman Effect Observations in the RS CVn Star HR 5110 and in Late-Type Stars with Strong Ca II Emission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Walter K. Bonsack
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA
Theodore Simon
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although magnetic fields are presumed to be of substantial importance in the physics of stellar chromospheres (e.g., Vaiana et al. 1981), firm detections of magnetic fields in stars later than type A are rare, if not entirely absent. For example, Boesgaard (1974) made careful photographic measurements of longitudinal fields in a number of dwarf stars, and obtained 5 σ or greater detection of fields at the level of 100 G in the G8 V stars in ξ Boo A and in the KO V star 70 Oph A. Robinson et al. (1980) studied ξ Boo A by means of an analysis of the widths of magnetically sensitive lines, and obtained a mean field magnitude of 2600 G. However, Marcy (1981) used the same technique and found no significant field in this star. Brown and Landstreet (1981) looked for longitudinal fields in a variety of late type stars with an adaptation of a Griffin-type radial velocity spectrometer, which yielded standard errors near 10 G. They found no fields in any of the stars which they surveyed, including ξ Boo A, 70 Oph A, and a number of RS CVn stars and other stars with strong Ca II K and He I 10830 A emission.

Type
I. Magnetic Fields in Stellar Photospheres
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983 

References

Boesgaard, A.M.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 188, p. 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bopp, B.W. and Talcott, J.C.: 1978, Astron. J. 83, p. 1517.Google Scholar
Brown, D.N. and Landstreet, J.D.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 246, p. 899.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L. and Crane, P.C.: 1978, Astron. J. 83, p. 1504.Google Scholar
Burke, E.W. Jr., et al.: 1980, Astron. J. 85, p. 744.Google Scholar
Conti, P.S.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 149, p. 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D.K.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, p. 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J.A. and Hall, D.S.: 1979, Astrophys. J. 227, p. 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, P.A.: 1979, IAU Circular No. 3366.Google Scholar
Hall, D.S.: 1976, in “Multiple Periodic Phenomena in Variable Stars”, Part I, ed. Fitch, W.S. (Dordrecht, Reidel Publishing Co.) p. 287.Google Scholar
Hartmann, L., Dupree, A.K., and Raymond, J.C.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 252, p. 214.Google Scholar
Joy, A.H. and Wilson, R.E.: 1949, Astrophys. J. 109, p. 231.Google Scholar
Marcy, G.W.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 245, p. 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, F.N. and Gibson, D.M.: 1978, Astron. J. 83, p. 1488.Google Scholar
Pallavicini, R., et al.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, p. 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, G.W. and Pyper, D.M.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, p. 983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimers, D.: 1982, Astron. Astrophys. 107, p. 292.Google Scholar
Robinson, R.D., Worden, S.P., and Harvey, J.W.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 236, p. L155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, T., Linsky, J.L., and Schiffer, F.H. III: 1980a, Astrophys. J. 239, p. 911.Google Scholar
Simon, T., Linsky, J.L., and Schiffer, F.H. III: 1980b, in “The Universe at Ultraviolet Wavelengths”, NASA Conference Publication 2171, p. 435.Google Scholar
Smith, M.A.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 224, p. 584.Google Scholar
Vaiana, G.S., et al.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 245, p. 163.Google Scholar
Walter, F., Charles, P., and Bowyer, S.: 1978, Astron. J. 83, p. 1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, O.C.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 205, p. 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, S.C. and Bonsack, W.K.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 176, p. 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zirin, H.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 208, p. 414.Google Scholar