Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:35:48.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Zeta/solar lines between 170 Å and 220 Å

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

R. Wilson
R. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Culham Laboratory, Nr. Abingdon, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An important problem in solar physics is the identification of the intense system of spectral lines lying between 170 Å and 220 Å. These lines have also been observed in the high temperature plasma, Zeta, and also in a number of other sources. These sources are reviewed and the experimental evidence relating to the problem of identification is discussed.

L'identification du système de raies intenses entre 170 et 220 Å est un problème important de physique solaire. Ces raies ont aussi été observées dans les plasmas à haute température, la machine Zéta et d'autres sources. Ces résultats sont passés en revue et les données permettant d'aboutir à une identification sont discutées.

Резюме

Резюме

Отождествление системы интенсивных линий между 170 и 220 Å является важной проблемой солнечной физики. Эти линии были также наблюдены в плазмах с высокой температурой, машине Зета и других источниках. Эти результаты просмотрены а данные позволяющие привести к отождествлению обсуждены.

Type
Session III. Interpretation of the Solar X. U. V. Observations
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 23: Astronomical Observations from Space Vehicles , 1965 , pp. 101 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © CNRS 1965 

References

1. Hinteregger, H. E., 1960, Ap. J., 132, 801.Google Scholar
2. Hinteregger, H. E., Hall, L. A. and Schweizer, W., 1964, Ap. J., 140, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Behring, W. E., Neupert, W. M. and Lindsay, J. C., 1962, Space Research III, 814.Google Scholar
4. Austin, W. E., Purcel, J. D. and Tousey, R., 1962, J. O. S. A., 52, 597.Google Scholar
5. Tousey, R., Austin, W. E., Purcel, J. D. and Widing, K. G., 1962, Space Research III, 772.Google Scholar
6. Fawcett, B. C., Gabriel, A. H., Griffin, W. G., Jones, B. B. and Wilson, R., 1963, Nature, 200, 1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Elton, R. C., Kolb, A. C., Austin, W. E., Tousey, R. and Winding, K. G., 1964, Ap. J., 140, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. House, L. L., 1964, This Symposium, p. 27.Google Scholar
9. Fawcett, B. C. and Gabriel, A. H., 1964–1965, Ap. J., 141, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Robson, A. E. and Hancox, R., 1959, Proc. Inst. Elect. Engs., 106 A, 47.Google Scholar
11. Edlén, B., 1964, This Symposium, p. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Neupert, W. M., 1964, This Symposium, p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Jordan, C., Private Communication (Sept., 1964).Google Scholar